On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:10:23PM -0800, Jerry Gaiser wrote:
> Currently all my spam messages are being dumped into a single file. Can
> I report spam to razor by passing the whole spam file - i.e.
> 'spamassassin -r < wholefile' or do I need to break out each spam email?
It only accepts a single
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:07:24PM -0500, Michael wrote:
> Where could I look for that. Like I said I checked in
> /etc/default/spamassassin & in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and they
> look ok. I also looked in my startup script and it looks ok. I will
> include them though in case you can
Additional question on 'spamassassin -r'
Currently all my spam messages are being dumped into a single file. Can
I report spam to razor by passing the whole spam file - i.e.
'spamassassin -r < wholefile' or do I need to break out each spam email?
--
Jerry Gaiser in North Plains, Oregon USA (Zone
I actually asked the same question a while ago.
I got an answer, but decided it was not really a good idea. The problem
is that you might wind up reporting false positives, instead.
The best idea is to send any found spam to a separate file, go through it
to delete any false positives, and the
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 05:19:48AM +0100, Johan Barelds wrote:
> I want to *automaticly* report every spam message found with razor.
> As i understood the way to do it is by the command "spamassassin -r <
> spammail".
Please please please, DON'T DO THIS! There've been very lengthy threads
about
Hi all,
I want to *automaticly* report every spam message found with razor.
As i understood the way to do it is by the command "spamassassin -r <
spammail".
How do i put hat in my .procmailrc ?
Just:
--
:0fw
* < 256000
| spamassassin
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| spam assa
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:52:19AM +0100, Johan Barelds wrote:
> I do experience some difficulties in using spamassassing with razor.
> When is try to report spam to razor with the command: "spamassassin -rD
> --
> debug: Razor is not available
> --
> Which is strange because i do have razor inst
hi all,
I do experience some difficulties in using spamassassing with razor.
When is try to report spam to razor with the command: "spamassassin -rD
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforg
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, could you explain? If there's no "blacklist_from_rcvd" what
> purpose would "unblacklist_from_rcvd" fill?
I had submitted a patch into the bugzilla for SA that
implemented a similar concept (if I understand it
correctly). Effectively it allowed a ne
Hello,
I have Spamassassin 2.43 running
on a FreeBSD 4.7-pl2
I had spamc/spamd working
flawlessly on the machine. However, I recently upgraded
to SA 2.43 and since then, spamassassin reports a
spam score of 0.0/$user-setting (where $usersetting is retrieved from an SQL databas
Administration Dept. wrote:
We have 512 MB of RAM, 2.5 GB Swap running Solaris 8 x86. It should be
plenty. I will try spamd on a separate server if I can't figure anything
out.
Thank you for the input.
-ed
How much free RAM do you have? I count about 26 spamd processes at about
8M residen
Ok, that clears up any chance of DNS/razor backlogs, and of "old version"
issues.
Hmm, here's something to try:
Disable the TRACKER_ID rule. There's been a recent fix to CVS that deals
with some problems with this rule causing run-away processes.
score TRACKER_ID 0
--
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:55:03PM -0500, Michael wrote:
> Do you have any other thoughts then as to why this would not be loading?
Not really. the error message looks 100% like something not able to
parse an option. I would try running spamd from the commandline with
the specified options. If
Do you have any other thoughts then as to why this would not be loading?
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Installation Problem
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 01:11:37PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile $PIDFILE --name $PNAME \
> > --startas $DAEMON -- $OPTIONS $DOPTIONS
>
> Well, my first comment is that the '--' tells spamd to stop reading
> commandline options. Since it
We have 512 MB of RAM, 2.5 GB Swap running Solaris 8 x86. It should be
plenty. I will try spamd on a separate server if I can't figure anything
out.
Thank you for the input.
-ed
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Puhek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Administration Dept." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
Thanks for the quick reply and interest; your help is appreciated. Below is
the information you requested.
SpamAssassin Version: 2.43
NOT using razor, pyzor, or DCC
We have out own Nameserver ns.shadow.net and ns2.shadow.net. We did not add
these to the SpamAssassin files.
Here is the output o
How much RAM do you have? If spamc starts swapping, you'll have a major
thrashing problem very quickly.
Use the -m parameter to ensure that you don't swap, or at least don't
swap too heavily. Queuing up the messages for spam processing should
work fine during peaks (unless your system is extrem
Could you point me to an example of how it should read then? I really
appreciate your help.
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] In
Hmm, There's a lot of useful info missing from your question...
What version of SpamAssassin are you using? (this helps identify if it's a
known bug in an old version of SA)
Are you using razor, pyzor, or DCC?
Do you have good DNS access (ie: an on-site or on the same-server DNS server)?
How l
Hello,
We are running SpamAssassin server wide via procmail and sendmail through
/etc/procmailrc . We are having a serious load problem even using the
spamc/spamd. The spamd processes completely hog the CPU to the point
sendmail panics and reports load problems in the syslog.
Below is the load
Hmm, could you explain? If there's no "blacklist_from_rcvd" what purpose
would "unblacklist_from_rcvd" fill?
Unless you want to change the semantics of how the "un" commands work and
what they mean, so you could do:
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unblacklist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mai
At 11:11 PM 12/16/2002 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-16 16:24:21 -0500]:
Therefore I assume this is only available in versions newer than 2.31
somewhere. Is that correct?
Yes, the current release version of SA is 2.43, and I think that feature
was added wi
I majorly screwed up with my exim configuration and somehow got
it into a repeating loop. As such, I've pretty much lost all email for
today. That means any suggestions regarding exim and sa that
were recently posted were unseen. damn. Thank goodness this is
a private mail server so I don't
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:07:24PM -0500, Michael wrote:
> Where could I look for that. Like I said I checked in
> /etc/default/spamassassin & in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and they
> look ok. I also looked in my startup script and it looks ok. I will
> include them though in case you can
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:13 AM
> To: Dallas Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] How to test whitelist_from_rcvd?
>
>
> Well, if you want to test a specific whitelist_from_rcvd,
> you'll have
Well, if you want to test a specific whitelist_from_rcvd, you'll have to either
1) get an email that really matches and one that is forged
-or-
2) save an email in mbox format and hand-edit the headers to
create 2 new emails, one that looks like a real mail and one
Where could I look for that. Like I said I checked in
/etc/default/spamassassin & in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and they
look ok. I also looked in my startup script and it looks ok. I will
include them though in case you can see something that I do not.
***
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:47:42AM -0500, Michael wrote:
> ***
>
> mini:/home/mweber# /etc/init.d/spamassassin start
> Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: Unknown option: -
>
> Spamd version 2.43
>
> **
Nope, this is my manual list and I have version 2.43
Jonathan
Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Jonathan Duncan said:
> > I have gotten a couple of vile spams that came through with NO problem
> > whatsoever because of the test "USER_IN_WHITELIST". It seems that the
> > spammer use
We run SA with Exim, using the sa-patch compiled in to Exim4. It was
VERY easy. Just apply the patch, and compile exim and sa as normal.
(spamd must be running as well as exim)
see http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html for details.
Our gateways serve over 1 accounts and '000's of mails
I am trying to load spamd and it is not working properly. I have
successfully configured spamd on multiple machines, but on this one server
in particular it is just not loading. This is the error that I am getting:
***
mini:/home/mweber# /etc/init
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:16:56PM +, Drav Sloan wrote:
>Is there a way to switch razor checking off? Is it as simple as
> setting the timeout to 0?
timeout, no, score, yes. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I suppose one could claim that an undocumented feature has no
semantics. :-(
Can anyone give me a recommendation on how I can test a whitelist_from_rcvd rule?
Thx
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http:/
Hutchins, Mike wrote:
> Ok, I am not a complete newbie, but the documentation for exim/sa is
> kinda causing me fits. Can anyone just give me the order in which I need
> to compile stuff?
See the Spamassassin INSTALL file for reference of the order (including
dependancies) for spamassassin.
Exim
Hello All,
Is there a way to switch razor checking off? Is it as simple as
setting the timeout to 0?
Regards
D.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Pe
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:28:16PM +0100, Stephane Lentz wrote:
> Is this problem fixed on the CVS version - and hopefully next release ?
Well, the problem from 2.31 was partially fixed in 2.40. There was
another bug in there that went unnoticed for a while (it looks like it
would do the right t
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:52:47AM -0500, James D. Stallings wrote:
> Is there a way to update the SPAMD Scoring Rules without
> loading a new version of the product? If so, I was unable to
> find the rules and if I found them... I am not sure I would
> know where to put them.
No. Rules/score
| From: Stephane Lentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| Ronan should have provided more information : I guess he's
| talking about some problem found by amavisd-new's author.
| The bug and patch is listed on http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ on
| Tips and FAQ -- spam scanners (Mail::SpamAssassin) sect
> There is a bug in Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm in routine
> check_for_faraway_charset_in_body (at least in all version between 2.31
> and 2.43). It causes Perl to go in a CPU loop, and amavisd fails to
> continue service, or reports timeouts. Either apply the patch, or
> disable CHARSET_FARAWAY
Ok, I am not a complete newbie, but the documentation for exim/sa is
kinda causing me fits. Can anyone just give me the order in which I need
to compile stuff?
I am going to have approximately 5000 users behind this thing, and it
will be the incoming smtp gateway.
Anyone think I am gonna have an
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:27:43AM -0200, Ronan Lucio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've installed SA in my server and I'm very happy with this.
>
> Lately I have seem many people (like me) having trouble
> making it work because some bugs already discovered and
> solved but, why SA is still avaliabl
Hi all,
I installed all of the razor stuff - one of the tests in the razor install
was having problems with my version of Time::HiRes, so I upgraded it to the
latest from CPAN and all the problems went away.
When running make test in the Spam Assassin extract dir, I get stuff like
this:
[root@sh
I put this question in before, but messed up the Subject... so
here I go again
Is there a way to update the SPAMD Scoring Rules without
loading a new version of the product? If so, I was unable to
find the rules and if I found them... I am not sure I would
know where to put them.
Thanks
Hello,
I've installed SA in my server and I'm very happy with this.
Lately I have seem many people (like me) having trouble
making it work because some bugs already discovered and
solved but, why SA is still avaliable to download with
such bug and we need to go to amavisd homepage to apply
the pa
My mistake, sorry.
The actual is below.
my $l = 1;
foreach () {
# Conditional compiling
if ($modules{'conditional'}) {
# Comment out lines carrying the REMOVEFORINST tag
if(/\bREMOVEFORINST\b/) {
s/^(\s*)/$1#/;
s/REMOVEFORINST/REMOVEDBYINST/;
}
}
# Variable rep
Jonathan Duncan said:
> I have gotten a couple of vile spams that came through with NO problem
> whatsoever because of the test "USER_IN_WHITELIST". It seems that the
> spammer used my email address in the To: field as well as the From: field.
> If all spammers did that, with my current confi
Mark said:
> Perhaps useful to know for others: Perl 5.005_03 needs "Errno.pm" in spamd
> 2.43. This does not show up on needed dependencies, nor in the "make test"
> run. The test just fails to start spamd (and you do not get to see why, cuz
> it redirects STDERR to /dev/null).
that's wierd --
Good day.
I am having an installation problem.
I followed the instructions in the INSTALL file
But when I run make install, i get the following error.
Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected end of string) at build/preprocessor
line 47, line 29273.
I have edited the Makefile.
Line 47 looks like
On 2002-12-16 16:37:41 -0800, Somik Raha wrote:
># isn't bigger than a few k and working with big messages can bring
># SpamAssassin to its knees.
>:0fw
Make that
:0fw: spamc.lock
otherwise for each spam procmail and spamassassin are started.
Makes for a nice DOS when you get more
On 2002-12-16 18:36:47 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> You're right, there's no blacklist_from_rcvd.. but do you really need/want
> such precautions there?
But unblacklist_from_rcvd would make sense. Please?
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2003/
---
On 2002-12-17 04:17:15 +0100, Klaus Heinz wrote:
> Martin Schroeder wrote:
> > eval:check_for_from_domain_in_received_headers('ebay.de', 'true') doesn't
> > work (with --local). :-(
>
> Did you search for 'ebay.de' in your mail? This string only occurred in
> the 'From:' line. Try 'ebay.com'.
Tha
52 matches
Mail list logo