Mike McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In other words, where are the checks being executed against spamcop and
> ordb and why are checks run against osirusoft? I thought by having the
> 'score RCVD...' in my user prefs file, that instructed SA to check those
> blacklist databases.
>
> Wha
After identification by the group that Net::DNS needed to be installed
for RBL usage to work, I've re-run the command:
spamassassin -tD < sample-spam.txt and a snippet of the output is:
debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM ==> got hit
debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule X_OSIR
I added zaconta.com to my MTA's spam reject list long ago...anything from
zaconta.com gets rejected with a code 550.
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Rich Puhek wrote:
> Does anyone else tend to get resumes from zaconta.com? They do not
> appear to honor removal requests, and frequently change the source of
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 05:40:20PM -0600, Ben M. VanWagner wrote:
> Dec 6 17:36:07 domain dccproc[12581]: send(dcc.dcc-servers.net
>(153.19.44.233,6277)): Operation not permitted
Can you run DCC from the commandline without error? It looks like a
DCC issue, not something with SA.
--
Randomly
"West Bloomfield bulk e-mailer Alan Ralsky..." has "been inundated with
ads, catalogs and brochures delivered by the U.S. Postal Service to his
brand-new $740,000 home."
"It's all the result of a well-organized campaign by the anti-spam
community, and Ralsky doesn't find it funny."
Really? I
I am having a little problem with dcc..
I have razor working fine and now im trying to get dcc and pyzor working
these are the messages I get in maillog
Dec 6 17:36:07 domain dccproc[12581]: send(dcc.dcc-servers.net (153.19.44.233,6277)):
Operation not permitted
Dec 6 17:36:08 domain spamd[12
Does anyone else tend to get resumes from zaconta.com? They do not
appear to honor removal requests, and frequently change the source of
their mailings.
Last message I got from them scored an 8.5. I'm set to tag at 10 (ISP
with false-positive sensitive users). There seem to be fairly consistent
try putting the defang_mime 0 in the local.cf file in
/etc/mail/spamassassin instead.
I got that from /usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf
"
# SpamAssassin basic config file
#
# Please don't modify this file as your changes will be overwritten with
# the next update. Use /etc/mail/spamassassin/loca
Hello,
I have noticed that most of the NS records for these spammers are the
same or similar. Would it be too expensive to do a quick lookup of NS
records to block these guys?
Here are my results:
[whiteout:~] patrick% host -t ns thelst40090hspeedm.com
thelst40090hspeedm.com name server NS1.HS
> "MM" == Michael Moncur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> These folks are serious spammers. They even register each of the domain
MM> names to look legit. Look up findhsm-list-cluster-182-643.com or any of the
MM> others, they're all registered to Daily Promotions. (It's a shame a WHOIS
MM> loo
* Ronan Lucio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> #==
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> defang_mime 0
> use_terse_report1
> report_header
Could some kind soul point me to a sample userprefs file with a goodly set of
user defined rules?
Thanks!
--
R o b T o w
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.tauzero.com/Rob_Tow
(408)-829-7407
*
*ronin in the glade
*swift katas slice the still air
*...his own opponent
*
-
With Bayesian enabled.. wouldn't it have a higher hit count? I didn't see
that in your list of test matches...
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: RE
Hello,
I create the file /etc/mail/spamassassin/user_prefs with
the follow content:
#==
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED]
defang_mime 0
use_terse_report
Sure do, but eventually I'll try to lookup a non-cached record. If the
server is not responding, then we have to wait for DNS to time out.
--Rich
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Stephen Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks! Setting 'rbl_timeout 5' cut the time down to 10 seconds per
mesage, instead of
> This looks like the bunch mgm was talking about. I have *no* spam from
> these guys, unfortunately.
I keep being surprised by the difference between different people's spam.
They account for nearly 10% of my spam...
> - catching the wierd "letters-numbers-letters-numbers.com" format they
>
Tom,
| I was looking around for something that would work as an advanced
| filter under postfix. I've had recommendations for amavisd and
| found some "stuff" on spamproxyd.
|
| How is this related to SpamAssassin? spamproxyd and a lot of
| people here have mentioned amavis so I'll guess this
report_header 1 will put the report in the message header.
defang_mime 0 will leave the HTML alone.
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Victor O'Rear wrote:
> How can I stop, preferably at the user_prefs file, spamassassin from
> modifying the messages? My users don't mind modifying the subject line, but
> HTML
This looks like the bunch mgm was talking about. I have *no* spam from
these guys, unfortunately.
I would suggest some rules like this:
- catching the wierd "letters-numbers-letters-numbers.com" format they
use for their domains
- the use of , a non-std HTML tag.
- this message-id f
Slava Madrit said:
> We are using Spamassassin on win32 along with Guinevere 2 for our
> GroupWise 6 system. I have a user who does not want his spam marked by
> spamassassin. So I added an entry into the whitelist that says ALL_SPAM_TO=
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that it will not get marked. It s
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Suzanne Skinner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:01:14PM -0300, Jose M.Herrera wrote:
>
> >> Try adding this line to your config file:
> >>
> >> defang_mime 0
>
> > Thanks... but excuse by my ignorance, but what function makes this option.
>
> By default, SpamAssassi
I was looking around for something that would work as an advanced
filter under postfix.
I've had recommendations for amavisd and found some "stuff" on
spamproxyd.
How is this related to SpamAssassin? spamproxyd and a lot of
people here have mentioned amavis so I'll guess this is a wealth
of i
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:36:19PM +1000, Andrew wrote:
> My Sendmail/Mimedefang/Spamassassin installation does not seem
> to be recognising the blacklist_to and whitelist_to lists.
> The filter picks up the blacklist_from and whitelist_from
> perfectly. Anybody know what might cause this?
You mig
* Stephen Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks! Setting 'rbl_timeout 5' cut the time down to 10 seconds per
> mesage, instead of 30. Although I don't think 30 is a bad number at all,
> it can start to be a problem on servers that have a high volume of e-mail,
> and a lot of spamd processes get start
24 matches
Mail list logo
