On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:26:16PM -0500, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> I just installed DCC but when I watch debug output I get the
> following error:
>
> debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
Try telling SA where dccproc is by putting this line in local.cf:
dcc_path
Suzanne
--
[EM
CPAN does not seem to have 2.43 yet -- I just tried an install and it told
me everything was up to date. I have 2.42 installed.
What's up?
Simon
---
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the J
We have SA running successfully on RH 7.3 and it is doing a terrific
job.
However, I havea question.
The two files that are created, almost-certainly-spam and probably-spam,
most of the time, contain emails that are not spam and need to be
distributed to the intended receipients.
Is there an
I am out of the office from Monday, Oct 21st until Thursday, October 24th.
Tom
---
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ads.sourcefo
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi list
>
> however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time, the
> CPU load shoots up to 90% or higher. and when this happens the mail
> server becomes very slow and sometimes users complain that they are
> not abl
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:26:16PM -0500, Mike Loiterman wrote:
> Razor2 is installed and running correctly, according to the log, how
> do I turn off the Razor1 checks?
score RAZOR_CHECK 0
> Also I get this error:
> debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> header C
hi list
i am maintaining a site-wide setup of spamassassin. we dont have any problems with
the CPU load when there are not much mails received by the server.
however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time, the CPU load shoots up
to 90% or higher. and when this happens the mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just installed DCC but when I watch debug output I get the
following error:
debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
Also I get these errors about Razor1:
debug: Razor1 is available
debug: entering helper-app run mode
debug: Razor Agents 1.
On October 22, 2002 07:17 pm, Michael Moncur wrote:
> > Hmm? I upgraded to 2.43 the day it was released and noticed all
[snip]
> It sounds like your particular situation isn't one where
> autowhitelisting will do much good.
My conclusion too. I use tmda to handle my 1-1 type correspondence
> Hmm? I upgraded to 2.43 the day it was released and noticed all my
> spam email was being let through after about 2 weeks. I run spamd with
> the -a (autowhitelist optio) on. I have since turned off the
> auto-whitelist option and everything works fine since.
Version 2.43 definitely fixed
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:58:31PM -0700, joe wrote:
> On October 22, 2002 06:26 pm, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote:
> > > But it does exactlly the opposite: AWL gives -5.0 points, so it is
> > > no longer recognized as spam!
> > >
> > > Is t
> Is there an English version of the "Tests Performed" as seen at:
> http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html ? Various "Description of Test"
> entries in the table at that URL are in foreign languages so it's not
> easy for us gringo's to be able to tell what the test does. tyia.
Weird, it looks li
On October 22, 2002 06:26 pm, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote:
> > But it does exactlly the opposite: AWL gives -5.0 points, so it is
> > no longer recognized as spam!
> >
> > Is this an intended behaviour?
>
> Yes... sort of. It WAS intended be
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote:
> But it does exactlly the opposite: AWL gives -5.0 points, so it is no
> longer recognized as spam!
>
> Is this an intended behaviour?
Yes... sort of. It WAS intended behaviour at the time. But we are
wiser now, and that change was r
Hi!
Using 2.42 (Debian testing package on woody)
AWL seems not to work the way it supposed to be:
I have removed the AWL files in order to reset the AWL data.
Than I have piped through the same spam message (9.50 hits, 5 required)
several times with 'spamassassin -a < spam-mail > spam-mail1.resul
Milt Epstein wrote:
> Anyway, I wanted to see if I could get help dealing with one repeating
> annoying spam message. Actually, I think the message is coming from a virus
> (i.e. machines that have been infected with the virus), but it seems the
> message can be dealt with as if it were spam. I'm
All,
Is there an English version of the "Tests Performed" as seen at:
http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html ? Various "Description of Test"
entries in the table at that URL are in foreign languages so it's not
easy for us gringo's to be able to tell what the test does. tyia.
Chris
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Steve Thomas wrote:
[ ... ]
> | Thanks for any help/suggestions you can offer.
>
> You *could* use procmail or even create a rule in SA to filter
> these, but you really should be using some sort of virus scanner and
> blocking the messages before delivery. SA is just a tool i
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 16:53, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
> Is there any way to use auto whitelists with an sql database instead of dbm?
there's a bug in Bugzilla about it (from 2.2 days), that Craig hasn't
done yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG a
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the release of Undertaker v. 0.6.0 under GPL license.
It can be downloaded from:
https://www.bouissou.net/wws/d_read/spamcombat/Undertaker/
Undertaker is a spam and mail viruses processing system based on procmail, and
compatable with any Un*x system that uses proc
Is there any way to use auto whitelists with an sql database instead of dbm?
Thanks,
Jeff
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 10/15/2002
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Figured it outmy procmailrc file had:
:0fw
| spamc -u USER_I_HAD_SETUP_THE_SYSTEM_WITH
just chaged it to
:0fw
|spamc
and all is good.
Mike Loiterman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key 0xD1B9D18E
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Have you looked at /var/log/maillog to see if it is having problems creating
the config files? (you may need to run spamd in debug mode) The spamd user
needs to be able to write to each user's home directory. Are you running
spamd as root and letting it suid to each individual user, or are you
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How do I generate this files...I'm running spamd with the -c option
but their not being created. I have one user (mine) that has the
.spamassassin directory but I think that's because I ran spamassassin
as that user.
I'm running spamd sitewide but
How would the term 'goldfish' score in the corpus? :)
There isn't much to key off of in the email itself. Very short. Heck, virus
writers could just make viruses with common, non spam realted words in them.
(Goldfish, spoon, eclipse, hoceky, monkeychow,) Then you would be adding
custom rules
I've seen this same question asked many times here. And I'm an SATALK noob!
Can we add a section in the FAQ in big bright neon letters that says how to
do just this?
Or as Josh mentioned, place it in the example under big blinking monkeys :)
"How to remove high scoring spam and mark up low scorin
Hi all,
At 21-10-2002 14:24 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
the answer: read the INSTALL file. You probably got no answers because
this is exact issue is directly explained in that file.
It doesn't say anything about my specific error...
So if you still have problems after you read the fine manu
>> # All other mail tagged as spam (eg. with a score higher than the set
>> # threshold) is tagged as "Probably SPAM"
>> :0 fBw
>> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
>> | formail -i "Subject: Warning: Message Probably SPAM"
>
> Why do you have "B" in the :0 line? That means to match the "B"ody of
> the message
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Milt Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there are different definitions of
> > what spam is, and I'm sure it fits some of them.
> [...]
> > appears to the person receiving the mail, it looks like spam and can
> > be dealt with as if it were
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Josh Trutwin wrote:
> # All other mail tagged as spam (eg. with a score higher than the set
> # threshold) is tagged as "Probably SPAM"
> :0 fBw
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> | formail -i "Subject: Warning: Message Probably SPAM"
Why do you have "B" in the :0 line? That means to
Am wanting to create a procmail filter where spamassassin is allowed to
markup and deliver spam as it is wont to do by default, but additionally
would like to drop a totally unaltered copy in another mailbox.
Ever since I let spamassassin run away and consume all my swap space
when fetchmail was d
| Both contain "goldfish" in the subject, one is just plain "goldfish"
| and one is "Fw: goldfish".
|
| Both have attachments, one is application/octet-stream, one is
| audio/x-midi.
|
| Both say:
|
| Hi Dear
| Check the attach
| See u
It's a virus:
http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w
Sidney Markowitz said the following on 22/10/02 17:43:
Milt Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
there are different definitions of
what spam is, and I'm sure it fits some of them.
[...]
appears to the person receiving the mail, it looks like spam and can
be dealt with as if it were spam. It
Milt Epstein said the following on 22/10/02 16:54:
Anyway, if you're talking about theoretical/technical distinctions,
perhaps it is virus-related. But there are different definitions of
what spam is, and I'm sure it fits some of them.
I didn't really want to get into a discussion of whether it
They say, "when all you have is spamassassin, everything looks like a spam."
Well, maybe they don't, but they should. (grin)
I'd add something to your /etc/procmailrc file for this; perhaps some unique
line from the attachment, and route it to dev/null. Because the document
isn't random.
You
Milt Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there are different definitions of
> what spam is, and I'm sure it fits some of them.
[...]
> appears to the person receiving the mail, it looks like spam and can
> be dealt with as if it were spam. It doesn't really matter how it
> originated.
Actually
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Frank Pineau wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:18:38 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:
>
> >Both contain "goldfish" in the subject, one is just plain "goldfish"
> >and one is "Fw: goldfish".
> >
> >Both come from hotmail addresses.
> >
> >Both have attachments, one is application/octet-st
You could have SpamAssassin running on a system that relays
all mail to your mail server. That way it can tag/delete
(however you set it up) the mail and then relay it to you.
No more concerns about aliases...
- Original Message Follows -
> Dear gurus,
>
> I use spamc/spamd for my local
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:18:38 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:
>Both contain "goldfish" in the subject, one is just plain "goldfish"
>and one is "Fw: goldfish".
>
>Both come from hotmail addresses.
>
>Both have attachments, one is application/octet-stream, one is
>audio/x-midi.
>
>Both say:
>
> Hi Dear
>
Greetings,
Sorry for the off topic post, but I am not a member of a procmail list and
I had hoped someone from this list would be kind enough to help me with a
procmail question that relates to SpamAssassin.
What I want to do is set up a user's .procmailrc to move messages that are
obviously spam
Hi. Just joined up the list. I started using SpamAssassin about a
week ago. Seems to be working well, but still a few false positives
and false negatives (more of the latter).
Anyway, I wanted to see if I could get help dealing with one repeating
annoying spam message. Actually, I think the m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
>> I still think my submissions of spam that isn't flagged by the system is of
>> particular usefulness, am I deluding myself? It seems like FP's or FN's
>> woul d always be the most useful additions.
>
> Well, too many and they'll overbalance the corpus [
I recently installed spamassassin system-wide under qmail using
qmail-scanner, and I've run into two problems.
1. I'm running spamd with -q -x to look user preferences up in mysql.
qmail-scanner doesn't seem to pass the username it's trying to deliver
to, so it consistently checks the database
Tanel Kokk said:
> Tanel Kokk wrote:
> > I have SA(v2.43)+MIMEDefang(v2.22) on relay server (it means no
> > mailboxes on that server).
> > Right now I have system-wide AWL feature enabled, But my purpose is to
> > implement AWL feature per address.
> > Is there any possibility to set up auto-wh
Dear gurus,
I use spamc/spamd for my local accounts, and it works perfect. My simple
question is how to use spamc/spamd for aliases. I do alot of forwarding from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some of the aliases are
heavily spammed.
Do the accounts have to be local? If I set up a lo
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 04:06, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have two rules that is not in my Spamassassin, so I thought I'd
> > share them.
>
> Could you please submit your rule suggestion as a bug report? That
> goes for everyone. :-)
Cool, will d
Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:37 AM
> To: Mike Loiterman
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs with spamd?
>
> * Mike Loiterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021022 02:23]: wrote:
> > # Start daemon.
> > [ -x /usr/bin/spamd ] && /usr/bin/spamd -dac &
I'm using freebsd4.2.6 release and sendmail 8.12.3
I'd like to know how to install spamassassin 2.43
I'd like also to know if it is necessary to have mimedefang to install
spamassassin for a system
Thanx for help
---
This sf.net emial is spon
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:01:26 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> try to run spamd, got following error:
>
> Can't locate syslog.ph in @INC (did you run h2ph?) (@INC contains: ../lib /us
r/perl5/5.00503/sun4-solaris /usr/perl5/5.00503 /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.005/sun4
-solaris /usr/perl5/site_perl/5
Tanel Kokk wrote:
I have SA(v2.43)+MIMEDefang(v2.22) on relay server (it means no
mailboxes on that server).
Right now I have system-wide AWL feature enabled, But my purpose is to
implement AWL feature per address.
Is there any possibility to set up auto-whitelist parameters
(auto_whitelist_p
50 matches
Mail list logo
