freebsd -stable
spamassassin 2.41
spamasassin -r
results in
razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 reporting requires
authentication at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm
line 77.
used to work until upgrade
clues?
randy
---
Vicki Brown wrote:
> I have had a response that it is "both" and that the "latest docs in CVS"
> should be "more up to date". I'm not sure where and how to find those docs
> but in any case I am at a loss.
As it often happens the developers were busy changing the code and left
some references to
Read the documentation! Run "man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" or
"perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" and look for "defang_mime".
Can we add a mime_defang section to the FAQ?
- Dan
Erik Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone have an eval rule for an invalid encoding header? I often see
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:48:55PM -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any way (or utility) to get/allow
> spamassassin to run through each message of an mbox file seperately. I
> tried running it on one month of archives and as far as I can tell, it
> marked the whole thin
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> I've got a few years of MailMan archives (in standard mbox format) that
> could really use some SPAM weeding. The archive is upwards of 3 gigs.
>
> I was wondering if there is any way (or utility) to get/allow
> spamassassin to run through each message
Hello,
I've got a few years of MailMan archives (in standard mbox format) that
could really use some SPAM weeding. The archive is upwards of 3 gigs.
I was wondering if there is any way (or utility) to get/allow
spamassassin to run through each message of an mbox file seperately. I
tried runni
Stephen Corey wrote:
> Does anyone use Pop3Proxy with Spamassassin on Linux?
I know of one person who was using it on RedHat 7.2, no complaints. I
haven't tried it myself, but it *should* be portable.
If it works for you, I'd like to hear about it.
Peace,
-McD
Alright, well I don't have any ulimits or limits that I know of since I've
never added any. I have 128 megs of swap space. The output of free is
the following:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:126372 120072 6300 0 1795
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 04:21:18PM -0400, Sunil William Savkar wrote:
> I guess what i meant is that before the reporting will work, I need to
> have razor's report agents set up and also an account set up, right?
For Razor2, yes. That's a Razor thing.
> Again, you are pointing out that there i
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:16:37PM -0400, Sunil William Savkar wrote:
>> However, Spamassassin itself does not have support for reporting spam
>> back to razor.
>
> Sure it does.
I guess what i meant is that before the reporting will work, I need to
have razor's report agents set up and also an
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:16:37PM -0400, Sunil William Savkar wrote:
> However, Spamassassin itself does not have support for reporting spam back
> to razor.
Sure it does.
> Thus, if I just want the benefits of the razor blacklists, I am set. If I
> want to start to contribute, then I need to
I think I am missing the boat and would like to see if I have things right
now...
Spamassassin 2.41 automatically checks lists, including razor and razor2
without any tweeks at all.
However, Spamassassin itself does not have support for reporting spam back
to razor.
Thus, if I just want the ben
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 11:52:50AM -0700, Aaron Falk wrote:
> I've searched the docs on this topic but neither sa nor razor talk
> much about how they integrate. I'm installing sa onto a system where
> there is a weird perl path and I have no admin control. So, I'm
> concerned that it will not k
Hi-
I've searched the docs on this topic but neither sa nor razor talk
much about how they integrate. I'm installing sa onto a system where
there is a weird perl path and I have no admin control. So, I'm
concerned that it will not know where to find razor. How can I verify
that sa has found ra
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 16:11, Erik Berry wrote:
> Does anyone have an eval rule for an invalid encoding header? I often see
> spam with this pattern:
Well, my setup: SA 2.41, Qmail,qmail-scanner, etc.. found this just from
your mail:
X-Spam-Report: Detailed Report SPAM: St
Read the manpage.. defang_mime is the option you want.
At 09:20 AM 10/4/2002 -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
>Can spamassassin convert an html email to text only if it is spam. If so,
>how? Thanks.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGee
defang_mime 1
in local.cf
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
| Anderson
| Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:20 AM
| To: Spamassassin
| Subject: [SAtalk] De-mime a message
|
|
| Can spamassassin convert an html email to text only i
Does anyone have an eval rule for an invalid encoding header? I often see
spam with this pattern:
From: Roland Contomichalos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ultimate HGH 1000 - Lose Weight while you sleep
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 11:35:14 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain
Conte
Can spamassassin convert an html email to text only if it is spam. If so,
how? Thanks.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassass
"Rice, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Actually, it looks like I get RBL+ as one big zone
> rather than a split zone for RBL, DUL, and RSS.
> Is there any way to set up a custom RBL check.
Search for the various rules with OSIRUS in their name and see how they are
implemented. relays.osirusoft
Actually, it looks like I get RBL+ as one big zone rather than a split zone for RBL,
DUL, and RSS. Is there any way to set up a custom RBL check. I don't want to check the
RBL at the MTA level in that I would rather let it pass through a weighted score
system like SA than immediately reject it.
Matt Sergeant said:
> > So, you haven't heard about drive-by spamming? You find an open wireless
> > lan connection and sit in somebody's front drive and spam away for a while.
>
> It's a myth. Don't believe everything you read. There are far more open
> relays than you could ever possibly ne
Daniel Rogers said:
> Out of curiousity, with all the new rules and whatnot, is (has?) the GA being
> rerun?
yep, I reran it using the mass-check data from 2.40, which was still valid
since the rules had not been changed apart from 1 or 2 mini-fixes.
--j.
Don Lindbergh said:
> I put the below lines in my $USER_HOME/.spamassassin/.spamassassin.cf file
> in an effort to force the use of the directory I want, however spamassassin
> as invoked by mail sent to the alias seemed to pay no attention to these
> instructions and continued to insist on using
Hi spamassassin-talk,
I installed spamassassin (spamc/spamd version) yesterday at 9 am it ran
perfectly all day until 3am when spamc started reporting spamc[12589]:
failed sanity check, 1059 bytes claimed, 4365 bytes seen (and other numbers
of bytes for every message through the system). Message
Kerry Nice wrote:
> From: "Daniel Rogers"
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:29:08PM -0700, Matthew Cline wrote:
> > > Geez, that's worse than using open relays. To what depths *won't*
> spammers
> > > sink to?
> >
> > None, clearly. It's only a matter of time before they start breaking in
> to
26 matches
Mail list logo
