whitelist_from seems to be strictly the rfc2822 header From: field. for
mailing list subscriptions, i need to allow white-listing the envelope
MAIL_FROM, which is also schlonged into the Return-Path: 2822 header.
any clues?
randy
---
This sf
Darian Rafie wrote:
> I've noticed two recent spam emails, both from mortgage lenders, with
> some nonsense like this attached at the end. Is this an attempt to
> throw SA off the trail?
Could be -- Decrease the chance of hitting a spam phrase score by padding
out the message?
Could also be ran
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:13:22PM -0500, Darian Rafie wrote:
> I've noticed two recent spam emails, both from mortgage lenders, with some
> nonsense like this attached at the end. Is this an attempt to throw SA off
> the trail?
It's what's known as a "hash buster," designed to foil programs tha
I've noticed two recent spam emails, both from mortgage lenders, with some
nonsense like this attached at the end. Is this an attempt to throw SA off
the trail?
d.
@@@ It is
assumed that my proposed independent structuralistic co
I installed SA 2.31 using CPAN and now find all my spamassassin commands
generate a bunch of debug output. This is fairly innocuous except for the
fact that it hoses up the various Emacs macros from which the spamassassin
command is invoked (what with new windows displaying and all). I can (and
>With a score as small as -0.036 the GA is giving more of a statement that
>this rule isn't much of an indicator of anything at all.
Just wondering, when runninh GA, would it be possible to make it a 2
step process, first step let it run without constraint, and on the
second setp force the nearl
Hi,
one week ago I installed spamassasin
within my qmail / qmail-scanner enviroment.
Spam filtering works, however spamassasin
uses my syslog facility, which is getting restarted
every night. After the restart every request
using "spamc" hangs, "spamc -c" works.
As a temporarily solution I rest
When I have spamassassin installed as a postfix filter, systemwide on my
mail server, does it ever look at per-user config files?
I can see that it doesn't create them, but I haven't been able to tell if
it's using them, or what their name should be.
I used the how-to paper from advosys to set u
Many thanks to all of you who helped me today...!
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:31:23PM -0500, Joel Epstein wrote:
>
>>If the following is in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, why does the
>>following mail not get tagged?
>>
>
> Are you running spamd? If so, did you rest
We are still at v2.20, I am surprised that none of the "market-speak"
phrases triggered. There are several that should be in the 2.31 spam
phrases, maybe they are in the CVS?
Only takes [1-9] minutes
fill out our form
new home loan
Mortgage rates
take action now
Refinance your home
extra cash
you
I had a user report this spam as getting through, so I ran it through
spamassassin -t to see what it scored... it only picked up the CASHCASHCASH
rule ($$$ in the subject).
Looking at it, I saw there was a URL to an IP address, so I looked in the
spamassassin .cf files and saw this in 50_scores.
> required_hits 6.1
...
> score RAPE 4.125
...
> rape rape rape
I think it only counts once. Since 4.125 < 6.1 makes it not spam.
Of course your total showed 0.9, as others noted, restarting spamd would
also be needed.
-Original Message-
From: Joel Epstein [mailto:[EMAIL
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 the voices made Joel Epstein write:
> ok... now what? =)
>
> If the following is in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, why does the
> following mail not get tagged?
Are you using spamc/spamd and forgot to restart spamd?
/t
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Throug
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 the voices made Robert Strickler write:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 the voices made SpamTalk write:
>
> > Like the thinkgeek at the bottom of these postings? ;)
>
> Yeah, I was planing on having all plugins off when installed, and some
> scale on morality, or whatever it might be c
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:31:23PM -0500, Joel Epstein wrote:
> If the following is in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, why does the
> following mail not get tagged?
Are you running spamd? If so, did you restart it after you added the rule?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Never trust any comp
> "SH" == Scott Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SH> line (as root), I get an error saying it can't locate
SH> Razor/Client.pm in @INC. Well, actually, I don't think I want to
SH> run razor. I just want to use the other checks in SA. How can I
SH> tell it to stop trying to run razor?
ok... now what? =)
If the following is in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, why does the
following mail not get tagged?
# How many hits before a mail is considered spam.
required_hits 6.1
# Whitelist and blacklist addresses are now file-glob-style patterns, so
# "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
I'd like to invoke it as a sendmail milter to strip them before SA has a
chance to score them. I think it would be valuable in reducing false
positives. The real trick would be to get it to autolearn the format of the
trailer for each domain in a list.
-Original Message-
From: Tony L. Sva
Joel Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let's see if I am on the right track... or am I placing these commands
> in the wrong files???
>
> Could I add the following to /usr/share/spamassassin/20_body_tests.cf:
You could, but your changes would be overwritten each time you
upgraded. Better to
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 02:48:17PM -0500, Joel Epstein wrote:
> Could I add the following to /usr/share/spamassassin/20_body_tests.cf:
First, you should add your own rules to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
-- if you add it to the normal rules files, they'll be wiped out when
you upgrade.
> full
Let's see if I am on the right track... or am I placing these commands
in the wrong files???
Could I add the following to /usr/share/spamassassin/20_body_tests.cf:
full RAPE /rape/i
describe RAPE contains rape
Then add the following to /usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores
Scott Henderson said:
> Since there doesn't seem to be any amavis mail list,
I'll be the people on the AMaVis list would be surprised to hear they
don't exist. :-)
http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=6006
---
This sf.net email is sponso
With a score as small as -0.036 the GA is giving more of a statement that
this rule isn't much of an indicator of anything at all.
I'd agree with the original poster, almost anything coming out of the GA
with a score between 0.05 and -0.05 is probably not worth running.
Ultimately it is contri
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:58:29PM -0500, Joel Epstein wrote:
> Hey all...
>
> How exactly do you create rules? I ask because I seem to be getting
> tons of email containing words like incest, etc
Directory rules/
Include a XX_custom.cf where XX are two numbers. The rules files get
tested
Gabriel, the "take something from these stored messages and develop
rules for them" is the whole purpose of this list and the SA effort.
The argument is that machines cannot develop reliable heuristics, but a
dedicated team of developers/users using the open source model can.
Please feel free to
In general the rules for SA are simple perl regexp format. You can also
create functions and make them a rule, but I've not done that myself yet.
You can add your rules to {HOME}/.spamassassin/user_prefs to add rules on
a per-user basis (if your SA gets run as different users) or
/etc/mail/sp
i get frequently spam that with spamassassin out of the box yeilds a score
of 1 to 2 ... i am trying to figure out a way to put a stop to it ...
currently i put the spam (as i manually go through my mail) into a folder
named spam.
i am thinking i would like to write some code to take the somethin
Hey all...
How exactly do you create rules? I ask because I seem to be getting
tons of email containing words like incest, etc
Any thoughts?
Thanks
--
=
Joel Epstein
Manager of Systems Integration
Integrated Warehousing Solutions
3075 Highland Parkway Sui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
could please anyone point me to instructions how to install SpamAssassin on
IRIX 6.5, specifically the spamd and spamc.
Thanks
Frank Bures, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Toronto, M5S 3H6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chem.utoronto.ca/gener
Since there doesn't seem to be any amavis mail list, I guess this
would be the best place to ask this... I want to run SA via the
amavisd-new script, under RH 7.3. I managed to compile
amavisd-new, but when I try to run "amavisd" from the command
line (as root), I get an error saying it can't lo
I just want some positive feedback regarding a project that will design
software that will remove ads in e-mails, once I get that I'll start with the
actual code...
Would people be interested in using and/or writing plugins for the different
services that they use?
/Tony
--
# Per sc
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 the voices made Shane Williams write:
> If only the original article had anything to do with spam. The study
> focused not on commercial or bulk mail, but how likely respondents were
> to answer a simple question, and whether that likelihood changed if
> there were only one o
If only the original article had anything to do with spam. The study
focused not on commercial or bulk mail, but how likely respondents were
to answer a simple question, and whether that likelihood changed if
there were only one or multiple recipients.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Tony L. Svanstrom wrot
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:49:50PM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
>
> http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/22/1516234.shtml?tid=111 >
>
> Discussing the article/page at:
>
> http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns2557 >
... which really doesn't have anything to do about spam, jus
I just installed and turned up Mailscanner(w/ f-prot), after having run SA
for some time. I know from watching the list that several others here are
running both as well.
I current have both running separately. That is, I am not running SA from
Mailscanner, but separately from procmail.
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/22/1516234.shtml?tid=111 >
Discussing the article/page at:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns2557 >
/Tony
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EM
Title: RE: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin + QmailScanner
Hello All;
I've been folowing this thread with intrest since I haven't had success getting SA working with Qmail on my system. However when I tried to add this code I broke qmail-scanner. Where does this go exactly please? I know nothi
Hello People,
I am new to SA but (2) problems I do have.
I run SA from my own home for personal use and it seems to work but I see this
in my procmail log:
procmail: Executing " ~/bin/SpamAssassin/spamassassin -P -c ~/bin/SpamAssassin/rules"
dccproc: not found
dccproc: not found
Can someone
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 the voices made Olivier Nicole write:
> >How would forgeries (e.g. viruses) be detected? Would there be an
> >"oops-I-didn't-mean-to-submit-that" option somehow?
>
> Real viruses are filtered before they reach any mailbox for delivery.
>
> Tose two addresses could be accessib
Hi.
I want to create a similar list of words as the ones that match
check_for_spam_phrases but I need that list to be in Spanish.
Can someone help with the procedure?
I can enter them by hand, or use the collection of spam I have, if there
is an already made script. I will probably have to mo
None of the porn rules fired on this message:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 20 03:33:17 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 25884 invoked by uid 152); 20 Jul 2002 07:33:17 -
Received: from alder.invision.net (206.112.34.75)
by antares.invi
"Christopher Crowley" said:
> SpamAssassin could make the prefix string configurable, so that I
> don't have to modify the code in future releases. I'll post my
> modifications once I make them.
This makes the most sense. The prefix string doesn't have to
be "SPAM: "; if it was configurable,
Hi,
is there any way to integrate SA within the Inflex-Scripts ???
Inflex can be found here: http://pldaniels.com/inflex/
Any hints/tips are welcome
Greetings,
--
Jörg Henner Fon: +49 (7 11) 48 90 83 - 0
ETES - EDV-Systemhaus GbRFax: +49
On Monday 22 July 2002 07:00 CET John Rudd wrote:
> On Sunday, July 21, 2002, at 08:30 , Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > http://www.spamassassin.org
> > > Is anyone besides me having problems getting to the site?
Jepp. The same is true for Justin's private page jmason.org. traceroutes to
both these serv
44 matches
Mail list logo
