> > system is automating the submission process. The trouble is
> that spammers
> > do sometimes include other people's e-mail addresses and so forth in
> > their spam -- for example, I get plenty of spam saying "your site
> > www.tigertech.net is not listed in search engines!" -- and an automated
(I posted this earlier but never got it back on the list; was monkeying
around with Sendmail earlier today, so.)
Well, I've figured out the reason for the problem I previously reported,
that being the fact that some (not all) of my "whitelisted" messages still
get tagged as spam, even th
Hi SA-folks!
This just dropped in this morning and got -0.3 hits. There might be
something wrong somewhere.
CU
André
--
Real programmers use "cat > a.out"
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 12 08:05:56 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0
Chris,
> I've been trying to work out one things but seem to not have enough
> of a clue to get anywhere. I can briefly describe this problem I am
> having as 'problem with filtering using user prefs when dealing with
> an aliased addresses ?'
Either you run SA after the alias has been resolved
Hi,
I am looking to set up a simple relay host to run SpamAssassin on using
RH7.3
If possible, I would like to avoid any additional processing, eg not use
MailScanner, mimedefang etc.
Is there a simple way to just have sendmail pass ALL incoming mail to
SpamAssassin for a spam checm then forwar
Hi all,
I've been trying to work out one things but seem to not have enough of a clue to get
anywhere. I can briefly describe this problem I am having as 'problem with filtering
using user prefs when dealing with an aliased addresses ?'
Firstly, I use exim with the following to deliver
This came across another mailing list I'm on. I don't know if anyone is
interested, but if you're involved in spam blocking for the enterprise
and feel like chatting for an article (with a very near-term deadline) ...
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Seeking enterprise spam
On Thursday 11 July 2002 19:17 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote:
> > Thanks, that worked. BTW, what is it's purpose and why is it generated
> > by default? Just curious.
>[...]
>
> Although in thinking about it, people don't really use SA
The X-Mailer header "e-Campaign" in this one sure sounds like
ratware. The tag turns up in the Content-type header too so it
might be useful to filter on that instead.
- Forwarded message from Marketing/Publicateonline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-T
Hi all
I have SA 3.21
defang 2.15
I have searched the on-line archives for the .subject AND have found lots of
folks with questions on what the problem is, but no answers. Did I miss
something?
sa.mimedefang.cf lives in /etc/mail/spamassassin
with:
rewrite_subject 1
use_terse_reports 1
defa
In rules/20_head_tests.cf is this comment:
# Headers that seem to only be used by a single spamming software and
# are found together in the same message:
# 1. X-MailingID and X-ServerHost
# 2. X-EM-Registration and X-EM-Version
# 3. X-Stormpost-To and X-List-Unsubscribe
Today I got a completely
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:34:19PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
>
> The other day, I got this little jewel in my e-mail. So I decided to have a
> little fun. I sent a reply to the sender indicating that I was very
> interested in their investment offer. Never heard back from them. So, I've
> b
On 10 Jul 2002 at 17:54, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 07:46:13PM -0400, Brian Kendig wrote:
> > I'm using spamd/spamc via fetchmail and procmail. When
> > SpamAssassin flags an email as spam, is there any way for me to
> > 'bounce' that mail back to the sender as if I never rec
On 9 Jul 2002 at 12:16, Hess, Mtodd, /mth wrote:
> I'm sure this has been done and is probably documented somewhere...
>
> I would like my Linux machine running Spam Assassin to simply filter the
> messages and pass them on to my Exchange server. I don't want to create
> individual user account
Well, I've solved the problem I previously reported, that being the fact
that some (not all) of my "whitelisted" messages still get tagged as spam,
even though the user_prefs file is being read (see my previous message to
the list which displayed a header which, despite having -94.4 points,
still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 04 July 2001 10:56 pm, BASSY OKON wrote:
> SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results
> -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original
> message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognis
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
=>You could put yahoo.com and hotmail.com into your whitelist.
=>
=>On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>
=>> When people send me mail from these domains, they have ads added to the
=>> end opf their messages, which SA picks up as spam. Anyway to pr
I do this in Procmail with the following right before copying tagged
messages to MBOX files for logging.
- snip -- procmailrc -
# Put From at beginning for MBOX format so Pine can read
:0 fhw
| formail -I "From " -a "From "
- snip ---
<>
|-Original Message-
|From:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote:
> Thanks, that worked. BTW, what is it's purpose and why is it generated
> by default? Just curious.
Most people use mbox style mail folders, the "From " at the start of a
line indicates a new message in the folder, so (indented):
Thanks, that worked. BTW, what is it's purpose and why is it generated
by default? Just curious.
v i n c e p u z z e l l a
s o f t w a r e d e v e l o p e r
(905) 762-5229
http://bluecatnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
> "GW" == Greg Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GW> Does SpamAssassin 2.31 now require Perl 5.6? I'm trying to build it on
GW> a Red Hat 6.2 box that only has Perl 5.005 installed and running into
GW> all sorts of problems: the spamassassin script now requires Pod::Usage,
GW> which requires
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> "rODbegbie" said:
>
> > Did the "fix" to stop the DCC not found messages cause SA to stop finding
> > DCC?
>
> yes, it did. whoops. current CVS is now fixed.
A ! got added somewhere between the patch I submitted to bugzilla, and the
code that got
On 11 July 2002, Ryan Cleary said:
> I'm using it with perl 5.005:
>
> [tryanc@steward tryanc]$ perl --version
>
> This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for i386-linux
>
> There were a number of prerequisites that needed to be installed, but it
> does work just fine.
Yeah, I did get it working
You could put yahoo.com and hotmail.com into your whitelist.
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> When people send me mail from these domains, they have ads added to the
> end opf their messages, which SA picks up as spam. Anyway to prevent this
> from happening?
>
>
--
"rODbegbie" said:
> Did the "fix" to stop the DCC not found messages cause SA to stop finding
> DCC?
yes, it did. whoops. current CVS is now fixed.
--j.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & mo
DCC was working fine on my system. I installed the latest CVS, and now I
see this in my maillog:
Jul 11 12:02:49 blazing spamd[5952]: debug: DCC is not available: system
failed
Did the "fix" to stop the DCC not found messages cause SA to stop finding
DCC?
Anyone else?
rOD.
--
Sell to them th
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:41:03AM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote:
> The screwedupmessage.txt file contains an additional line at the top
> that breaks the header format. It looks like this:
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED]Thu July 11 11:26:34 2002
>
> This is corrupting our messages. Does anyone el
When people send me mail from these domains, they have ads added to the
end opf their messages, which SA picks up as spam. Anyway to prevent this
from happening?
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have -
-happened but none stranger than this. Does your dri
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Greg Ward wrote:
> Does SpamAssassin 2.31 now require Perl 5.6? I'm trying to build it on
> a Red Hat 6.2 box that only has Perl 5.005 installed and running into
> all sorts of problems: the spamassassin script now requires Pod::Usage,
> which requires File::Spec 0.8 or late
Title: Corrupt Header
I'm in the process of integrating spamassassin with zmailer.
After running:
spamassassin -t < origmessage.txt > screwedupmessage.txt
The screwedupmessage.txt file contains an additional line at the top that breaks the header format. It looks like this:
From [EMAIL
Robert L Mathews said:
> I'd definitely recommend including phone numbers as well as URLs and
> e-mail addresses. I have a manual content blocking list that I maintain
> for egregious spammers, and I've found that the most spam is blocked by
> URLs, followed by phone numbers, then e-mail addr
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:12:03AM -0400, Greg Ward wrote:
> Does SpamAssassin 2.31 now require Perl 5.6? I'm trying to build it on
> a Red Hat 6.2 box that only has Perl 5.005 installed and running into
> all sorts of problems: the spamassassin script now requires Pod::Usage,
> which requires Fi
Does SpamAssassin 2.31 now require Perl 5.6? I'm trying to build it on
a Red Hat 6.2 box that only has Perl 5.005 installed and running into
all sorts of problems: the spamassassin script now requires Pod::Usage,
which requires File::Spec 0.8 or later, etc.
Thanks --
Greg
Hi all,
Apologies for the long post but I really like being able to
filter spam and would like to get this fixed.
Exim 3.30
Spamassassin 2.20
Debian Linux 2.2r6
I hope someone may have an idea whats going wrong here. I've
searched the Exim list archive and can find only one other person
who ha
Is there a way that I can delete high scoring spam with
spamass-milter/spamd (without procmail)?
-Bill Omer
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & more
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> >>...
> >>ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Namely, they trigger on every instance of 'aic7xxx' for me. :)
> >>...
> >
> >
> > aha, now it makes sense ;)
>
> Gratuitous use of \b should fix that.
And "CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA
http://www.emailsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2102
Tips on Avoiding Spam Filters: Yes Even Opt-In Email Lists Are in Danger
Recently a well-known email marketing executive called us up to
share her excitement about her new viral campaign. We were psyched
too - viral friend-tell-a-friend camp
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:53:07AM -0700, Russ Gilman-Hunt wrote:
> This question has probably been asked a billion times before. Please be
> patient with me..
>
> After installing Sendmail (8.19) and SpamAssassin (together) and swapping the
> old email server (an old clunky MacIntosh thing) fo
Justin Mason wrote:
>>...
>>ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Namely, they trigger on every instance of 'aic7xxx' for me. :)
>>...
>
>
> aha, now it makes sense ;)
Gratuitous use of \b should fix that.
Matt.
---
This sf.net email is
>...
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Namely, they trigger on every instance of 'aic7xxx' for me. :)
>...
aha, now it makes sense ;)
--j.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & more
http:
Andrew Kohlsmith said:
> I disagree. Why on earth are kernel config options tripping porn tests? an
> ALL_CAPS test sure, but porn tests?!
yep -- agreed, Andrew!
--j.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
PC Mods, Computing goo
Hi,
Env: Redhat 6.1
I have installed SpamAssassin from tar file
when running the test after installation with the debug mode on (-D)
if get a 'Broken Pipe'. Here is the output
[root@linuxnol:~]#spamassassin -D -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nospam.out
debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for defa
Hi,
Env: Redhat 6.1
I have installed SpamAssassin from tar file
when running the test after installation with the debug mode on (-D)
if get a 'Broken Pipe'. Here is the output
[root@linuxnol:~]#spamassassin -D -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nospam.out
debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for defa
43 matches
Mail list logo
