RE: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-07 Thread dempsey
OK, probably not such a smart question on that last one. I got the answer on a quick google search. Now I will look for a way to configure maildrop to do the job. Thx Doug -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Olivier Nicole Sent: Friday, June

RE: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-07 Thread dempsey
Sorry for being ignorant but what is the term LDA? -Original Message- From: Olivier Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 9:29 PM To: dempsey Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working... >I finally got it working and it is tagging email.

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-07 Thread Olivier Nicole
>I finally got it working and it is tagging email. However, spam is still >making it to my inbox. Is there something else to this I am missing? SA only tags spam, it is the role of your LDA to do something with such email, put it in a separate folder, quarantine it, delete it, whatever you want.

[SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-07 Thread dempsey
I finally got it working and it is tagging email. However, spam is still making it to my inbox. Is there something else to this I am missing? Thanks Doug Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 21677 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2002 02:08:23 - Delivere

Re: [SAtalk] new user question

2002-06-07 Thread David T-G
Bill -- ...and then William Schwartz said... % % I'm pretty new to spam-assassin. Currently I'm using the default setup and Welcome! % procmail to flag my spam and it's been working really well. Good. % % I"d like to figure out how to use some of the options like blacklist_to % whitelist

[SAtalk] new user question

2002-06-07 Thread William Schwartz
I'm pretty new to spam-assassin. Currently I'm using the default setup and procmail to flag my spam and it's been working really well. I"d like to figure out how to use some of the options like blacklist_to whitelist_to, etc... on a per user basis. I have the default /etc/mail/spamassassin/lo

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question: procmail's eating my headers

2002-06-07 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:12:46PM -0700, Aaron Falk wrote: > Actually, I use sendmail so I have no exim.conf. :( I'm not familar with sendmail, but I'm sure there's something similar. > > Through some private correspondance I've been led to believe that there is > a bug in procmail (even the

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question: procmail's eating my headers

2002-06-07 Thread Aaron Falk
>> > > Fetchmail can't get the messages from the IMAP server because now it >> > > see's a corrupt mailbox. The messages look like this: >> > > >> > > rom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 7 00:12:27 2002 >> > > > Did you check the FAQ at http://www.spamassassin.org/faq.html ? > yep. > > > I wa

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question: procmail's eating my headers

2002-06-07 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 08:03:44AM -0700, Aaron Falk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:22:47AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Aaron Falk wrote: > > > > > Fetchmail can't get the messages from the IMAP server because now it > > > see's a corrupt mailbox. The messages look li

Re: [SAtalk] Newbie with Cobalt - Help!

2002-06-07 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 07:13:25PM +0100, Colin Jack wrote: > I have downloaded and installed the .rpm and all the stuff the documentation > mentions is there in the correct place. I have copied the spamassassin > startup script to /etc/rc.d/init.d. However when I try and start the daemon > I get

[SAtalk] Newbie with Cobalt - Help!

2002-06-07 Thread Colin Jack
Firstly I must admit to only having a passing knowledge of *nix, so please treat me like an idiot! I want to run SpamAssassin as a daemon on our Cobalt RAQ3 which I think uses a modified version of RedHat. I have downloaded and installed the .rpm and all the stuff the documentation mentions is t

Re: [SAtalk] How SpamAssassin works & load testing

2002-06-07 Thread David T-G
Support -- ...and then Support said... % % Thanx for the FAQ David, that makes things far more clear Happy to help! % % % ''Hi, Support! % % My, what an interesting name you have. Were your parents athletic?'' % % Ha, Ha, % Actually, Im just using the support@iquest email so if(when) I

RE: [SAtalk] How SpamAssassin works & load testing

2002-06-07 Thread Support
Thanx for the FAQ David, that makes things far more clear ''Hi, Support! My, what an interesting name you have. Were your parents athletic?'' Ha, Ha, Actually, Im just using the support@iquest email so if(when) I leave here, my heir can use the same list. I tried to grab that spam tarball b

Re: [SAtalk] How SpamAssassin works & load testing

2002-06-07 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 the voices made Support write: > how can I load test a test server? It's pretty hard to spam myself. Ive > tried forwarding all my hotmail spam to my test account but that's not > enough. I'd like to try 200 messages or so. > Can you guys spam me? Considering what some of

Re: [SAtalk] How SpamAssassin works & load testing

2002-06-07 Thread David T-G
Hi, Support! My, what an interesting name you have. Were your parents athletic? ...and then Support said... % % Hi, % % I have mailscanner and spamassassin installed on a RH7.2 box. A good start. % % Let me get his straight...when new mail comes into the mailserver % spamassassin tries t

[SAtalk] How SpamAssassin works & load testing

2002-06-07 Thread Support
Hi, I have mailscanner and spamassassin installed on a RH7.2 box. Let me get his straight...when new mail comes into the mailserver spamassassin tries to check whether or not it is spam by looking it's name/characteristics up on an online database somewhere or does it have a local database that

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question: procmail's eating my headers

2002-06-07 Thread Aaron Falk
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:22:47AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Aaron Falk wrote: > > > Fetchmail can't get the messages from the IMAP server because now it > > see's a corrupt mailbox. The messages look like this: > > > > rom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 7 00:12:27 2002 >

Re: [SAtalk] Updating Rules

2002-06-07 Thread Craig R Hughes
Olivier Nicole wrote: ON> > The tricky part is maintaining a list of which rules will work only in CVS vs ON> > which rules are OK for the nightly distro. ON> ON> I beleive regexpr are stand alone. Not always -- for example when "rarebody" gets added as a regexp type. ON> I beleive most eval a

Re: [SAtalk] Average Spam Size?

2002-06-07 Thread Craig R Hughes
Jeremy Zawodny wrote: JZ> Does anyone with a large spam collection have good stats on the JZ> average message size? SizeCount - 0-1k89 1k-10k 57170 10k-50k 17062 50k-100k 530 100k-200k 282 200k-500k 128 500k-10M47 That's a

Re: [SAtalk] bug: spamd does not honour -s flag

2002-06-07 Thread Steven Núñez
Thanks all. I see why this is happening. Would this be a proper forum to suggest an enhancement to allow logging with facility and level? Regards, - Steve On 7/6/02 15:31, "Lars Hansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 07 June 2002 14:39, Steven Núñez wrote: >> I've just installed th

Re: [SAtalk] bug: spamd does not honour -s flag

2002-06-07 Thread Craig R Hughes
I answered this question first time you asked it. use -s mail not mail.info You set the facility, not the level of logging. C Steven Núñez wrote: SN> To be exactly, under OpenBSD 3.1, I am starting spamd with the following SN> command line: SN> SN> /usr/bin/spamd -d -a -c -s mail.info

Re: [SAtalk] bug: spamd does not honour -s flag

2002-06-07 Thread Lars Hansson
On Friday 07 June 2002 14:39, Steven Núñez wrote: > I've just installed the latest version of spamd, and everything seems to > work well with one exception. The -s flag, that is supposed to indicate > which syslog facility is use does not appear to be working. Yes, facility not level. You're tryi

Re: [SAtalk] Updating Rules

2002-06-07 Thread Craig R Hughes
rODbegbie wrote: r> Craig R Hughes wrote: r> > It's now r> > been quite a while since our last release, and so I'm going to do the r> > 2.30 release imminently. I will post a separate thread message with r> > the usual freeze request plus requests for nonspam.log submissions. r> r> Just a thoug

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question: procmail's eating my headers

2002-06-07 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Aaron Falk wrote: > Fetchmail can't get the messages from the IMAP server because now it > see's a corrupt mailbox. The messages look like this: > > rom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 7 00:12:27 2002 Get ftp://ftp.procmail.net/pub/procmail/testing/snapshot.tar.gz and install

[SAtalk] newbie question: procmail's eating my headers

2002-06-07 Thread Aaron Falk
Hi- I'm trying to integrate Spamassassin into my RH7.2 system and am having some trouble. I'm using fetchmail to bring mail from a shared IMAP server to my local machine. I've used the entry from the SA FAQ on how to use procmailrc and I'm finding the the leading 'F' from each mail header is di