[SAtalk] performing all tests

SpamAssassin currently (v2.11) performs all tests on each message, even when it's clear early on that a message will be classified as spam. Some tests (most notably the network tests) are quite slow. A single message can take 20-30 seconds to process with the network tests enabled, as opposed to

Re: [SAtalk] PostgreSQL

* Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020408 23:05]: > > > I used postgresql, wasn't a problem, but you have to re-do the table > schema since its mysqlish. Figured that. The sequence and the indexing is my guess. I would like to see per-user AWL in SQL, then I might convert over. (I may actually se

Re: [SAtalk] PostgreSQL

I used postgresql, wasn't a problem, but you have to re-do the table schema since its mysqlish. Brian On 8 Apr 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Haven't set it up yet, but you'll need DBD::Pg > > LER > > > On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 22:23, Jay Hodges wrote: > > Has anyone tried to use PostgreSQL

Re: [SAtalk] PostgreSQL

Haven't set it up yet, but you'll need DBD::Pg LER On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 22:23, Jay Hodges wrote: > Has anyone tried to use PostgreSQL for the SQL interface? If so, is there a > DBI::postgres that is required? > > Thanks, > Jay Hodges > Draco Digital > > > > ___

[SAtalk] PostgreSQL

Has anyone tried to use PostgreSQL for the SQL interface? If so, is there a DBI::postgres that is required? Thanks, Jay Hodges Draco Digital ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassass

[SAtalk] No suck thing

In 20_body_tests.cf in the latest CVS: > describe NO_COSTNo suck thing as a free lunch (3) ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

Thanks Paul. The -x did the trick. Can the README to spamd be update to reflect this? List Stuff: Is this a feature or a bug? Did this change from 1.5 to 2.11 or 2.20? It seems the before I upgraded that if the SQL was not found, it would use a home directory config file, then defaults. (Of

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

> > Doesn't seem to be working how? Try spamd -D -q and let us know what it says... > spamd won't consider -q without -x try spamd -D -x -q -- = Paul Rushing [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Sponsored by http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

Craig R Hughes wrote: >Daniel Rogers wrote: > >>On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:15:24AM -, Nick Rothwell wrote: >> >>>...and I've had half a dozen copies now... >>> >>Odd, this same spam scores 4.8 on my machine. Also, this could be tickling >>the bug described in bugzilla bug #180, which is now

Re: [SAtalk] Using SpamAssassin if you don't own ... (clarification)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 08 April 2002 16:10 pm, Bart Schaefer wrote: > The first thing you need is an algorithm for determining > whether two messages are similar enough to be considered the > same. E.g., Razor uses a hash of a stripped subset of the > message. >

[SAtalk] spamassassin and spamtraps

Hmm... I could have sworn I sent this to the list, but I didn't see it. Then my laptop died miserably and I lost mail. So, I appologize if this already made it to the list. Anyway, I have several spam traps that are working fine. However, they don't change the from address when they send the s

Re: [SAtalk] Using SpamAssassin if you don't own ... (clarification)

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Sundial Services International, Inc. wrote: > What I don't see anywhere, though, is the notion of the elimination of > spam through comparison of messages in different mailboxes. Most of the > algorithms I have found so-far analyze a _single message to determine if > it "look

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

I meant running only -d now that I removed -q. I couple of quick questions, can -D put out the debug stuff from individual messages when not running in a terminal? Does the SQL info show up in the -D initial output that shows up in the log file that I should be looking for? Thanks, Jay Hodges D

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

Jay Hodges wrote: > running spamd as daemon with -d flag only. > > If user config files exist and the SQL database exists which one has a > higher priority for settings? with only the "-d" flag, spamd won't ever consider SQL settings. > Also, -q does not seem to be working, (spamd is not acces

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

Daniel Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:15:24AM -, Nick Rothwell wrote: > > ...and I've had half a dozen copies now... > > Odd, this same spam scores 4.8 on my machine. Also, this could be tickling > the bug described in bugzilla bug #180, which is now fixed in CVS. If I were a b

Re: [SAtalk] Using SpamAssassin if you don't own ... (clarification)

Sundial Services International, Inc. wrote: > That's interesting. I'll look into it. > > What I don't see anywhere, though, is the notion of the elimination of spam > through comparison of messages in different mailboxes. Most of the > algorithms I have found so-far analyze a _single message t

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:15:24AM -, Nick Rothwell wrote: > ...and I've had half a dozen copies now... Odd, this same spam scores 4.8 on my machine. Also, this could be tickling the bug described in bugzilla bug #180, which is now fixed in CVS. Dan. ___

Re: [SAtalk] Using SpamAssassin if you don't own ... (clarification)

That's interesting. I'll look into it. What I don't see anywhere, though, is the notion of the elimination of spam through comparison of messages in different mailboxes. Most of the algorithms I have found so-far analyze a _single message to determine if it "looks like spam." At 06:58 PM 4/7

Re: [SAtalk] Compilenow() directive

Not sure what the bug ever was. We do use compilenow in spamd. What compilenow does is allow you to precompile the regexs without passing an actual message through. It's intended to be called exactly once when you startup a long-lived scanner process which can then fork to process individual me

[SAtalk] Compilenow() directive

I use MailScanner with SA which calls SA using the perl inclusions. One of the directives is compilenow() to compile the object. Mailscanner use to use this before 2.11 but stopped because of false positives. I had asked Julian the maintainer if this had been fix and he wasn't sure so I figured

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

Nick Rothwell wrote: >...and I've had half a dozen copies now... > Yes, that's always a risk when they don't say much. I got that spam, too, and noticed that they have a random string at the bottom to evade signature tests like Vipul's Razor. We subscribe to some commercial anti-spam services,

[SAtalk] spamd: writing all spam to file

Hi all, I plan to move to spamd; now I use a little wrapper-script which moves all spam to a file (/var/spool/spam) how can I do this with spamd? Wolfgang ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi

Re: [SAtalk] My problem with SA not seeing the whitelist

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered drunkenly: >| For whatever reason I cannot get spamd to bind to the port as any user >| except root. > > Only root can bind to ports <1024. It looks like spamd uses 783, thus > it must be root while it

[SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

...and I've had half a dozen copies now... --- Start of forwarded message --- X-Coding-System: iso-8859-1-unix Mail-from: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 08 00:02:24 2002 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 5635 invoked from network); 8 Apr 200