Daniel Pittman wrote:
[...]
> It's not reliable enough in the face of:
>
> * NAT
> * Any MTA that fails to insert a received line.
> * fetchmail
>
> The last will screw up, too, because it has a hop to the ISP SMTP
> listener, then a pickup from the ISP POP3 host and delivery to the local
> ma
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002, Donald Greer wrote:
> One potential new check would be for "Received:" sequences.
Nope.
> E.G. that there's no message with a "Received: from XXX by YYY"
> followed by "Received: from WWW by ZZZ". If ZZZ received the message,
> then ZZZ should have sent it on the next hop (
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Shane Williams wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, dman wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:13:29PM -0600, Donald Greer wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > | Basically, the first time email is recieved from somebody, they
>> > | are sent a mes
Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Donald Greer wrote:
>
>>Charlie Watts wrote:
>>
>>>That sounds like blocking that would be better done outside of
>>>SpamAssassin.
>>>
>> Maybe I wasn't clear. What I was trying to describe was a system
>>where by the "Auto Whitelist" would _suggest_
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Donald Greer wrote:
> Charlie Watts wrote:
> > That sounds like blocking that would be better done outside of
> > SpamAssassin.
>
>Maybe I wasn't clear. What I was trying to describe was a system
> where by the "Auto Whitelist" would _suggest_ address to be added to a
> us
Charlie Watts wrote:
> That sounds like blocking that would be better done outside of
> SpamAssassin.
Maybe I wasn't clear. What I was trying to describe was a system
where by the "Auto Whitelist" would _suggest_ address to be added to a
user's whitelist, but _NOT_ automagically add them a
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Donald Greer wrote:
>Ok, since this has been a _very_ unpopular suggestion :^), how about
> this. We collect potential auto whitelist addresses and then send an
> email (setup a web page?) where the _USER_ can select who get's
> whitelisted, and who get's ignored (and may
Bonjour !
Le vendredi 8 février 2002 à 21:01:17, vous écriviez :
>> DE> # QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl"
>> DE> # export QMAILQUEUE
>> DE> # echo -e "To: postmaster@localhost\nSubject: This is a QMAILQUEUE
DE> test\n\n"
>> DE> | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
>>
>> DE> After you
Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Shane Williams wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, dman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:13:29PM -0600, Donald Greer wrote:
>>>[...]
>>>| Basically, the first time email is recieved from somebody, they are
>>>| sent a message asking them to co
Since my forte is not REs, I need some help creating a rule. Basically,
what I would like to do is "whitelist" ALL local mail. My idea behind
this is that mail generated by us to our users should NEVER get spam
tagged. Now I can't really whitelist my domain, as many spammers will use
local e-m
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Shane Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, dman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:13:29PM -0600, Donald Greer wrote:
> > [...]
> > | Basically, the first time email is recieved from somebody, they are
> > | sent a message asking them to confirm their identity before m
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Marcus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 February 2002 19:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] postfix w/out procmail
>
>
> hey,
>
> I want to run spamassassin on a relatively busy postfix server, where
> procmail really isn't an option.
> DE> # QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl"
> DE> # export QMAILQUEUE
> DE> # echo -e "To: postmaster@localhost\nSubject: This is a QMAILQUEUE
test\n\n"
> DE> | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
>
> DE> After you run that, check your postmaster account and there should be
a
> DE> message
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, dman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:13:29PM -0600, Donald Greer wrote:
> [...]
> | Basically, the first time email is recieved from somebody, they are
> | sent a message asking them to confirm their identity before mail is
> | delivered.
> [...]
> | What do you think?
Can anyone tell me how to setup spamassassin to work as a
filter using postfix -- that is, not using procmail?
--j
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Bonjour !
Le jeudi 7 février 2002 à 22:00:32, vous écriviez :
DE> # QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl"
DE> # export QMAILQUEUE
DE> # echo -e "To: postmaster@localhost\nSubject: This is a QMAILQUEUE test\n\n"
DE> | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
DE> After you run that, check your po
hey,
I want to run spamassassin on a relatively busy postfix server, where
procmail really isn't an option. Can postfix be setup to directly
process the messages (not per user), using a transport or some such?
--j
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:13:29PM -0600, Donald Greer wrote:
[...]
| Basically, the first time email is recieved from somebody, they are
| sent a message asking them to confirm their identity before mail is
| delivered.
[...]
| What do you think?
I don't like that idea. email is supposed
One potential new check would be for "Received:" sequences. E.G.
that there's no message with a "Received: from XXX by YYY" followed by
"Received: from WWW by ZZZ". If ZZZ received the message, then ZZZ
should have sent it on the next hop ( or atleast something with the same
IP address a
Folks,
Take a look at "http://www.paganini.net/ask/";. This is a discription
of how "Active Spam Killer" works. Could be useful as an option for
auto whitelisting.
Basically, the first time email is recieved from somebody, they are
sent a message asking them to confirm their identity
Here's my setup:
I have a vanilla install of Red Hat linux running a fairly plain Intel
server. I have Q-mail, Q-mail Scanner, and Sophos AV running. All 3 of
these worked fine before trying to install Spamassassin.
When I install SA downloaded 2.01 and used the perl makefile to do the
install.
The documentation on spam trapping isn't really all that clear, so I would
just like to verify that I am doing this right.
the email address I wish to trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so, using qmail with vpopmail, I would go to the domains/domain.dom directory
and create a .qmail-nothingbutspam file
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 01:20, Charlie Watts wrote:
> Depends. Does Exim actually process all the Received lines, or does it
> just test the connecting host?
>
> Trouble is that SA has some flexibility I think Exim doesn't have - the
> ability to tag message differently based on the contents of the
23 matches
Mail list logo
