Daniel Pittman wrote: [...] > It's not reliable enough in the face of: > > * NAT > * Any MTA that fails to insert a received line. > * fetchmail > > The last will screw up, too, because it has a hop to the ISP SMTP > listener, then a pickup from the ISP POP3 host and delivery to the local > machine. Another discontinuous jump. >
True. I hadn't thunk of that :^). > > In my opinion, of course. :) > It's a good opinion. Forget I mentioned it. > Daniel > > -- -------------------------------------------------------- Donald L. Greer, Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Administrator Voice: 512-300-0176 AustinTX http://www.AustinTX.COM/ All opinions are my own. Flame me directly. "I don't necessarily believe software should be free... but if you pay for it, it should work!" -- Me _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
