In 20_body_tests.cf, there's a rule for the phrase "work at home":
body WORK_AT_HOME /(?:WORK (?:AT|FROM) HOME|HOME.?WORKER)/
describe WORK_AT_HOME Information on how to work at home
This missed a couple of spam messages I received today. Here's a suggested
improvement -
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> The corpus we have now may be fine for techies, but it frankly needs
> work for us ISPs.
>
> The +1 scores for tests with a GA score above 20 and 30 is a good
> idea, but remember that both hotmail and msn have those goddamn "click
> here for MSN|Hotm
> * 0.8 -- Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found
>
> This test seems to be plain wrong; If I send a message from hotmail, it
gets
> tagged with this score. Is this a known problem?
Yes, if you check the archives I think I mentioned it a couple weeks ago,
then someone else brought it up ag
* 0.8 -- Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found
This test seems to be plain wrong; If I send a message from hotmail, it gets
tagged with this score. Is this a known problem?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The corpus we have now may be fine for techies, but it frankly needs work for
us ISPs.
The +1 scores for tests with a GA score above 20 and 30 is a good idea, but
remember that both hotmail and msn have those goddamn "click here for
MSN|Hotmail Photos" signatures.
Actually maybe that's all we
Oh, oops. I'm not using spamd, yet, for lame historical reasons.
I'm calling spamassassin directly.
-Bill
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 11:37:11AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> To turn it off, don't turn it on -- ie omit the "-a" flag to spamd.
>
> C
>
> On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 10:46, Bill O'Hanlon
Get rid of the "-a" switch in spamd.
---
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
> O'Hanlon
> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sitewide auto_whitelist db
>
>
> On Fri, Feb
To turn it off, don't turn it on -- ie omit the "-a" flag to spamd.
C
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 10:46, Bill O'Hanlon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:52:57AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> critical bugs in the 2.0x release. For now, people might consider turning
> off auto-whitelisting (
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:52:57AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> critical bugs in the 2.0x release. For now, people might consider turning
> off auto-whitelisting (particularly site-wide) if they don't want the
> false-negative rate to go up.
What's the best way to turn it off site-wide? I did
