Hello,
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 02:51:12 +0900
SAITOH Masanobu wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 2014/09/29 0:39, Michael Lorenz wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: macallan
> > Date: Sun Sep 28 15:39:36 UTC 2014
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/arch/evbarm/rpi: rpi_ma
Hi.
On 2014/09/29 0:39, Michael Lorenz wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: macallan
> Date: Sun Sep 28 15:39:36 UTC 2014
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/evbarm/rpi: rpi_machdep.c
>
> Log Message:
> make global variables static
> also, make cursor test pattern red/green to
Martin Husemann wrote:
|On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:35:04PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Not being able to get to the list of pull-ups from that page, or
|> at least getting a hint of where to find them is... a mistake.
|
|I wouldn't call it a mistake (though links certainly can be added)
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
src/tools: README
Log Message:
Say that tools should use C89, not C99;
Given the state of the toolchain with effectively requiring C++ for both
GCC 4.8 and Clang, does this really still make sense? The only relevant
semi-mo
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:34:50AM +, Alan Barrett wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: apb
> Date: Tue Sep 30 07:34:50 UTC 2014
>
> Modified Files:
> src/tools: README
>
> Log Message:
> Say that tools should use C89, not C99;
Given the state of the toolchain with effect
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:35:04PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Not being able to get to the list of pull-ups from that page, or
> at least getting a hint of where to find them is... a mistake.
I wouldn't call it a mistake (though links certainly can be added) -
that page documents something c
