On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:34:50AM +0000, Alan Barrett wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: apb > Date: Tue Sep 30 07:34:50 UTC 2014 > > Modified Files: > src/tools: README > > Log Message: > Say that tools should use C89, not C99;
Given the state of the toolchain with effectively requiring C++ for both GCC 4.8 and Clang, does this really still make sense? The only relevant semi-modern toolchain I can think of without C99 support is MSVC and we don't support that anyway. Joerg
