Re: CVS commit: src/tools

[Alan Barrett]

On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Modified Files:
        src/tools: README
Log Message:
Say that tools should use C89, not C99;

Given the state of the toolchain with effectively requiring C++ for both
GCC 4.8 and Clang, does this really still make sense? The only relevant
semi-modern toolchain I can think of without C99 support is MSVC and we
don't support that anyway.

Perhaps it does make sense to allow C99 in tools, but I think we 
have tried to avoid it until now.

--apb (Alan Barrett)