On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:13:20 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
>> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use
>> stronger keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does
>> not
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:13:20 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
>> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use
>> stronger keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does
>> not
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:13:20 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
>> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use
>> stronger keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does
>> not
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
> to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
>
> There
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:32:43 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
>> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use
>> stronger keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does
>> not
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:52:23 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
>> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use
>> stronger keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does
>> not
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:32:43 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
>> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use
>> stronger keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does
>> not
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
> to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
>
> There
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
> to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
>
> There
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
> to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
>
> There
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:08:09 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Fernando Guallini has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Convert bits to bytes when necessary
>
> Have you timed the differences? I remember we've deliberately used small k
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
> to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
>
> There
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
> to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
>
> There
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:50:53 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
>> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use
>> stronger keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does
>> not
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
> to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
>
> There
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
> to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
>
> There
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:34:32 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
> Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. Since the purpose of
> these tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they can be updated to use stronger
> keys length (2048-bits) and stronger Salt (16 bytes). This PR does not intend
Several tests currently use weak key and salt sizes. If the purpose of the
tests is not to evaluate weak keys, they should be updated to use stronger
keys. This PR does not intend to update the tests to use stronger algorithms.
There is no significant increase in tests run time, those still run
18 matches
Mail list logo
