On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:42:11 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
>> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>>
>> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
>> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even thou
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:42:11 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
>> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>>
>> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
>> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even thou
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:43:22 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> Yes, that was my concern, but I would prefer to keep relying on
>> ProvidersSnapshot to revert to the original state.
>
> It's fine if you want to keep `ProvidersSnapshot`, but the `/othervm` is no
> longer necessary, AFAICT.
Ignore:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:01:19 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java line 29:
>>
>>> 27: * @library /test/lib ../testlibrary
>>> 28: * @summary Make sure Provider api implementations are synchronized
>>> properly
>>> 29: * @run main/othervm S
> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>
> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even though it does not fail as it
> catches the exception, it never reache
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:37:17 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> Fernando Guallini has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional
>>
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 15:45:54 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
>> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>>
>> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
>> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even thoug
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:42:21 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
> hi @bradfordwetmore Could you please review this PR?
Hi, just back from vacation, and busy until Tuesday at earliest. I'll put a
note in calendar, but please ping me if I haven't responded by Thursday.
-
PR Comment: ht
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 15:45:54 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
>> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>>
>> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
>> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even thoug
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 15:45:54 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
>> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>>
>> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
>> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even thoug
> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>
> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even though it does not fail as it
> catches the exception, it never reache
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 13:13:00 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
>> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>>
>> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
>> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even thoug
> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>
> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even though it does not fail as it
> catches the exception, it never reache
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 11:25:39 GMT, Matthew Donovan wrote:
>> Fernando Guallini has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional
>>
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:54:16 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
>> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
>> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>>
>> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
>> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even thoug
> As highlighted in the bug description, The test
> **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
>
> 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
> java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even though it does not fail as it
> catches the exception, it never reache
As highlighted in the bug description, The test
**security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues:
1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws
java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even though it does not fail as it
catches the exception, it never reaches the remove
17 matches
Mail list logo
