> As highlighted in the bug description, The test > **security/Security/SynchronizedAccess.java** have some issues: > > 1. it needs to implement the sigalg, otherwise it throws > java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException . Even though it does not fail as it > catches the exception, it never reaches the removeProvider loop. Also, adding > an extra assertion to verify the local providers were actually removed. > 2. It is reassigning the **provs** variable with Security.getProviders(). > This will start adding/removing some of the system providers, in addition to > the local providers, which it is not the test intent. > 3. Adding othervm flag to run in isolation. > > Test runs in tier2
Fernando Guallini has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: added brackets, and refactor a comment and an exception message ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19480/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19480/files/1549cc59..3502c27a Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=19480&range=02 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=19480&range=01-02 Stats: 11 lines in 1 file changed: 4 ins; 0 del; 7 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19480.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19480/head:pull/19480 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19480
