On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, roelof 't Hooft wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> This is driving me nuts, I have been searching in all the
> obvious places for information on this but still can not
> find what is wrong :
>
> utilities.h:15: error 7: Old style C declaration. IGNORED 'Delay'
> utilities.h:15: error 141
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Bin Shi wrote:
http://sdcc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sdcc/trunk/sdcc/
seems a bad link.
There has been an attack on several of SourceForge's servers and so they
have taken some services temporarily offline (including ViewVC noted in
the link above).
Another side e
On Wed, 4 May 2011, stof...@skulp.net wrote:
> Hi, I have to transmit an unsigned long as four bytes, so I split them up
> and join them again, but with the folowing example code, I get overflow at
> long_counter>32767 - can any of you give me a clue how to do it right?
> // split long_co
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Kristoffer Ek wrote:
>
> On 4.5.2011, at 6:20, Erik Petrich wrote:
>
>> long_counter = (char_counter[0] | (char_counter[1] << 8)) |
>> ((unsigned long)(char_counter[2] | (char_counter[3] << 8)) << 16);
>
>
> This overfl
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Kevin Bailey wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Erik Petrich
wrote:
long_counter = (unsigned int)(char_counter[0] | (char_counter[1] << 8)) |
((unsigned long)(char_counter[2] | (char_counter[3] << 8)) << 16);
I hope the first (unsign
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011, Borut Razem wrote:
> Dear sdcc developers,
>
> are we ready for the sdcc 3.1.0 RC1 planned for tomorrow?
>
> Borut
I'm done with my pre-release bug stomping (unless, of course, something
turns up in the release candidates that I've broken).
Erik
-
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Butuza Tamas wrote:
> Dear SDCC developers,
>
> I found a bug when I tried to compile a code for pic16F1938. (14 bit
> enhanced core)
>
> The problem is: The optimizer breaks the code. Makes part of the code
> unreachable.
> Error message is:
> test.c:51: warning 110: cond
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm looking at asm generated for the following loop (8051, a CYCFX2LP
> actually) with sdcc 3.1.0#7066:
>
> __sbit __at 0x98+1 TI;
> void main() {
> while (!TI);
> TI = 0;
> }
>
> I get this:
>
> 00101$:
> jbc _TI,00115$
>
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, roelof 't Hooft wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am using a #define to do a calculation during compile
> time and load the result in an (8 bit) uart register so
> that I can set the baudrate.
>
> I am using the following in a header file :
>
> #define crystal 11059200
> #define bd4800
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Daniel Michalik wrote:
> When comparing the asm outputs I see that the first example does not call
> ___fs2uint, why does it not need to do this to cast the value of x?
> void main(void) {
> float x = 6116.0;
> debug = x;
> //debug is 6116.
> }
> unsigned
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Stefan Falk wrote:
Hey guys, it's me again!
Trying to get rid of the need of Keil I am trying to be able to debug a
program that was compiled under the SDCC.
The program runs on a eval-board which communicates with a server.
I can communicate with this server by bridgei
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, Erik Petrich wrote:
> There used to be a link on the SDCC web page that described the .cdb file
> format that has debugging information, including the line/address
> relationships. I'm not sure what happened to it, but I'll tell you the
> part you n
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Ben Shi wrote:
> And the for.c is in the standard regression test of SDCC
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/sdcc/src/regression/for.
> c
>
> sdcc for.c -mmcs51
> for.asm:175: Error: missing or improper operators, terminators, or
> delimiters
> for.asm:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Ben Shi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to Microchip's website,
> http://www.microchip.com/pagehandler/en-us/products/picmicrocontrollers,
> 8-bit PIC has 4 serials, pic-10, pic12, pic16, pic18.
>
> So what is the pic14 port in SDCC ?
>
> Quite strange about that.
>
> Ben
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Jacques Pelletier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use the macros (.macro/.endm) in the SDCC assembler for
> the Z80. However, it doesn't seem to work, and neither the latest
> version of ASZ80 (5.06).
>
> For both, the macro is not expanded and give the same main.lst
>
> Here
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
> Hello Maarten,
>
> so far I observed it only for the ADC result register (ADC_DR) for read,
> and timer 3 compare register (TIM3_CCR) for write. The way I realized
> was simple: the ADC the result was skewed, and the TIM3 period was
> wrong. How
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, r...@remi.lu wrote:
> Hello
>
> SDCC : stm8 3.4.1 #9068 (Sep 5 2014) (Linux)
>
> I dont see the difference between this ( A and B ) :
>
> I have _lcdchar declared by :
>
> .area OSEG
> _varOne:
> .ds 1
> _lcdchar:
> .db 1
>
> .area CSEG
>
> .
> .which seems not working
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> On 21.01.2015 19:36, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
>>
>> 1) how do I declare and implement the trap handler? According
>> to http://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/patches/224/ the keyword "__trap? is
>> available via patch (2014-02-22). Is this already par
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
On 21.01.2015 19:36, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
1) how do I declare and implement the trap handler? According
to http://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/patches/224/ the keyword "__trap? is
available v
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
hello all,
as mentioned elsewhere I am trying to port the STM8-SPL library by STM to SDCC.
Currently I got stuck at a seemingly simple problem.
Here’s the technical background:
1) my target is to modify only the common headers, not the projec
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
hello all,
thanks a lot for your feedback! As for your mails see my comments below
You forgot the option to modify SDCC so it accepts the __interrupt keyword
either before or after the function :)
w I figured that is not really an o
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
> hi Maarten, hi Erik,
>
> thanks a lot by your feedback! Below I got 2 contradicting opinions: if I
> understand Erik right, there is no easy fix to this problem and I should
> just skip the declaration in the interrupt header file (like for
> Rai
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, alvin albrecht wrote:
Sometime after #9676 and up to and including #9682, I am seeing an increase
in z80 binary sizes of 25% in some compiles. It seems to be connected to
increase spill to the stack and higher use of index registers in accessing
stack variables. I wil
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> On 30.07.2016 10:02, Erik Petrich wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, alvin albrecht wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sometime after #9676 and up to and including #9682, I am seeing an
>>>
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Délisson Gonçalves wrote:
I'm currently trying to use SDCC to generate an Intel Hex file for a PIC16
device (pic18f452). I'm using a Makefile and multiple source files, to be
compiled separately and linked at the end. This is my Makefile setup:
CFLAGS=--std-c99 --use-non-f
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Maxwell Leiter via Sdcc-user wrote:
Hi,On OS X, Apple has decided to symlink `gcc` to `clang` (and all related
tools to their clang equivalents). So, I need to use `gcc-7` specifically to
use `gcc`. Is there a way to pass options to sdcc to use `gcc-7` instead of
`gcc`? Sp
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Full support for function pointers would need:
1) A way to get individual bytes of 24-bit symbols
2) A way to get the upper 16 bits of 24-bit symbols
Philipp
If that is true, then the ds390 target is totally broken and the huge
model for mcs5
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Is anyone still using the old register allocator for a z80-related backend?
If not, we could just remove it.
Philipp
I believe the 8bitworkshop IDE, which integrates an editor, several
toolchains (including SDCC), and several emulators into
The first release candidate (RC1) for SDCC 4.1.0 is available in our
SourceForge File release system:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/
In addition to the source package, binaries are available for 32- and
64-bit Windows, 64-bit macOS, and x86_64 GNU/Linux.
If you have time, please ver
The official release for SDCC 4.1.0 is available in our SourceForge
File release system:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/sdcc/files/
In addition to the source package, binaries are available for 32- and
64-bit Windows, 64-bit macOS, and x86_64 GNU/Linux.
In addition to various bug fixes, notable
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Greg Mann wrote:
> I am beyond myself tring to find the problem with the attached code.
> It is giving me a error on a ";". I have been able to get this code
> to run on other demo compiler. If anyone could find the problem it
> would make me very happy.
>
> Greg Man
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Mr.Cashe wrote:
> But I have found this draft:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1124.pdf
>
> Page 59, $6.3.2.3.1 says: "A pointer to void may be converted to or from a
> pointer to any incomplete or object type. A pointer to any incomplete or
> object typ
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Dheya Ghazi Mustafa wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to pass a pointer of struct to function.
> I received the following error.
>
> C:/plansw_006_doc/CoordinateMapper.c:59:
> error 52: Actual Argument type different from declaration 1 from type 'struct
> piccolodatastruct generi
33 matches
Mail list logo
