It's not hard to automatically copy-the .rel to a .o file for those rare
times it actually is needed.
I believe you will find the choice of .o is related to the 'traditional'
naming of files created by the earliest Z80 assemblers and compilers on
both dedicated OS's and CP/M
also play a part!
Art
-Original Message-
From: PowerMan
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:13:58 +0800
Hello, I am looking for a compiler for AVR,
but I notice that there is a comment "AVR and gbz80 targets are no
longer maintained"
on the webpite of SDCC "http://sdcc.sourceforge
>Quoth robin...@viatech.com.cn at 2009-07-23 17:04...
>> Hello, I am looking for a free compiler for Atmel AVR.
>>
>> I notice there is a comment like "AVR and gbz80 targets are no longer
>> maintained"
>> on the website http://sdcc.sourceforge.net/.
>>
>> I would like to know why?
>> Is it O
ns for it and expand on it.
There will be quite a few people who will be grateful for such an effort.
Art C
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based ap
od way of getting started but is no
substitute for original thought (or action for that matter).
Art C
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based appl
r sites that run M$
simply because the job is quicker and more reliable with Brasero.
Art C
Richard Erlacher wrote:
> BTW, Dave, I have several bought and paid for versions of UNIX right down in
> the basement. I don't use 'em because there's so little of use that runs
&g
OK, it's a lot of years ago and the memory grows dim but IIRC C was used
to rewrite the operating system that became Unix around '72 - '73 and
had been developed for that reason.
I _think_ the OS was already called UNIX (or maybe still UNICS) but it
was certainly an assembler coded kernel with a
s much use for *nix.
Surely you can download, install and try out tools like C::B, FreeRTOS,
WinAVR etc without too much expense?
Art C
Richard Erlacher wrote:
> So ... it says in the quoted email that it (CodeBlocks) supports SDCC
> ... Does it do that under Windows? Have you tried it ther
Bobby Garner wrote:
>
> Someone mentioned Code::Blocks earlier. I tried to use it a couple of
> years ago, but when I joined the forum and began asking questions about
> using it with SDCC, I was ridiculed, marginalized and laughed out of the
> process by some of the major players in the progra
Thanks! Not sure how much testing I can get done but it's got to be better.
Art C
>> De: Philipp Klaus Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Asunto: [Sdcc-user] Z80 users: New optimizations implemented, substancial
>> code size reduction, please test for r
-Dave
>
>
[ and another hand ]
I use it too
Art Clarke
Australia
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
h
11 matches
Mail list logo
