[sane-devel] Problems with mustek_pp and releasing the parallel port

2004-01-05 Thread Jim George
Eddy and Joachen, when I tried to run saned under gdb I got the following output. Doesn't look good does it? Can you tell me what I should do now? SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=255 gdb GNU gdb 5.2.1 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public Lic

[sane-devel] Problems with mustek_pp and releasing the parallel port

2004-01-07 Thread Jim George
--=_20040107102039_63664 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Hi, > > as I said before (but I don't know whether it came through because of > the mail hickups), the problem in gdb is almost certainly caused by > xinetd that is still running and listen

[sane-devel] Problems with mustek_pp and releasing the parallel port

2004-01-07 Thread Jim George
Hi Eddy, see in-line below. Jim > Hi Jim, > > I think it's normal that saned exits after one scan. Normally, it's > xinetd that restarts saned when a new request comes in. > To restart saned in gdb, you only have to enter "r" at the prompt and > then you can perform another scan. > > What surpr

[sane-devel] Problems with mustek_pp and releasing the parallel port

2004-01-08 Thread Jim George
Eddy, Without inetd... scanimage hung and when I ctrl-c'd out of scanimage I get the following "scanimage: received signal 2 scanimage: trying to stop scanner " saned did not quit. When I killed it, the saned window showed these last few lines "[saned] do_scan: read 0 bytes from scanner [sane

[sane-devel] Problems with mustek_pp and releasing the parallel port

2004-01-10 Thread Jim George
--=_2004011317_94993 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Hi Jim, > > now we are getting somewhere. > It looks like the driver is waiting for the scanner motor to stabilize, but it waits forever, either because it doesn't stabilize, or because the

[sane-devel] Problems with mustek_pp and releasing the parallel port

2004-01-10 Thread Jim George
--=_20040110205913_95570 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Eddy, I do have a printer connected to the same port. It's an Epson Photo Stylus 820cxi if that makes any difference. I tried turning off/on my scanner but that made no difference, then

[sane-devel] Canon LIDE 20 or LIDE 30 or EPSON 1660 P

2004-01-19 Thread Jim George
Chaps, does anyone know if either of the above are supported by SANE? I was unable to find them on the supported device page but thought that maybe they were known by another name. I also noted in the spec of my local supplier that the USB port is USB 2.0 compatible, does this mean it doesn't wo

Fw: [sane-devel] mustek_pp trouble

2004-01-04 Thread Jim George
o.uk=20 To: joc...@penguin-breeder.org=20 Cc: jim.geo...@blueyonder.co.uk ; sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org=20 Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 8:25 PM Subject: Re: [sane-devel] mustek_pp trouble > Hi, > > Jim George wrote: >> [sanei_pa4s2] sanei_pa4s2_open: could not fin

[sane-devel] Inetd is not a friend of saneds.

2002-03-03 Thread Jim George
Did you remember to send a SIGHUP to inetd? Jim > From: Henning Meier-Geinitz > To: sane-de...@mostang.com > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Inetd is not a friend of saneds. > Date: 02 Mar 2002 19:50:38 +0100 > > Hi, > > On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 04:32:31PM +0100, Johan Andrén wrote: > > I have been

[sane-devel] mustek parallel scanner stopped working since adding epson printer

2002-03-03 Thread Jim George
Folks, I've been trying to add an Epson Stylus Photo 810 printer on my usb port, however this is has proved problemeatic so I defaulted to parallel and all seemed well. However now I'm having problems scanning (see error message and debug output below). I'm not sure if it's me or

[sane-devel] mustek parallel scanner stopped working since adding epson printer

2002-03-05 Thread Jim George
2 at 11:07:24PM +, Jim George wrote: > I've been trying to add an Epson Stylus Photo 810 printer on my usb > port, however this is has proved problemeatic so I defaulted to parallel > and all seemed well. > > However now I'm having problems scanning (see err

[sane-devel] xsane issues on Mac OS X

2002-04-10 Thread Jim George
Paul, this may come over as selfish, appologies if it does, but when you get a frontend built that I can use across the network (I have my scanner plugged into my linux box), please let me know so that I can do some testing with you/for you? Either scanimage or xsane will do to be

[sane-devel] xsane issues on Mac OS X

2002-04-11 Thread Jim George
Paul, I'm not aware of any Mac OS X client that can 'talk' to a sane backend on a Linux backend. My scanner is a Mustek 1200CP+ flatbed parallel port scanner. Jim - Original Message - From: "paul beard" To: "Jim George" Cc: Sent: Wednesday,

[sane-devel] sane under cygwin

2002-04-18 Thread Jim George
ssful with this venture. My question is, can someone point me at a reference or person to get me started on this? Thanks in advance, Jim George

[sane-devel] sane under cygwin

2002-04-21 Thread Jim George
Henning, see below please Jim > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 07:47:06AM +0100, Jim George wrote: > > for various reasons I've moved from SuSE to cygwin and I want to know if > > I can bring sane with me as it appears to be the best/easiest way for me to > > offer remote

[sane-devel] MacOS client

2002-04-21 Thread Jim George
Have you tried joshi? Jim - Original Message - From: "Mick Barry" To: "Martyn Ranyard" ; "Sane devel list" Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:10 PM Subject: Re: [sane-devel] MacOS client > What do you mean by "Free in both senses"? > > At 04:15 PM 18/04/2002 +0100, Martyn Ranyard wrote:

[sane-devel] install problems on Mandrake 8.0 system

2002-04-21 Thread Jim George
Folks, I've tried to compile sane-1.0.7 on a Mandrake 8.0 system. The problem I get is listed below...can you advise? Jim # ./configure --with-gphoto2 creating cache ./config.cache checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no configure: error: installation or

[sane-devel] sane/xsane on Mac OS X?

2002-04-23 Thread Jim George
Can I just ask the originator what development tools is he/she using? Jim - Original Message - From: "Henning Meier-Geinitz" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:07 PM Subject: Re: [sane-devel] sane/xsane on Mac OS X? > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:47:27PM +0200, Olivier Chararas

[sane-devel] Re: sane/xsane on Mac OS X?

2002-04-25 Thread Jim George
ras" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:41 AM Subject: [sane-devel] Re: sane/xsane on Mac OS X? > Jim George wrote : > > > Can I just ask the originator what development tools is he/she using? > > > > Jim > > > Hello, > > In fact i didn't want to or

[sane-devel] Brand-Newbie question

2001-10-14 Thread Jim George
I've just installed sane with the mustek_pp backend. I had no /dev/scanner entry in my /dev directory therefore, after much scrabbling around and guessing, I created a symbolic link from /dev/lp0 to /dev/scanner. I chose /dev/lp0 as this is the entry in /etc/printcap that equates to the lp

[sane-devel] Brand-Newbie question

2001-10-14 Thread Jim George
On Sunday 14 Oct 2001 12:31 pm, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > In the file mustek_pp.conf you've also specified the name for the > scanner, which you want to use, for example "name SM-1200CP", then you > have to use the device mustek_pp:SM-12000CP. Furthermore, you can only > access the scanner as root.

[sane-devel] Current backend (drivers) list (sane-backends.html)

2001-10-30 Thread Jim George
I notice that the mustek 1200cp (a parallel port scanner) isn't listed even though it works (kinda). Is this omission on purpose or accidental? Jim On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 23:19, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > The list of the SANE backends for SANE 1.0.6 can be found at > http://sane.meier

[sane-devel] GIMP lpugin

2001-11-13 Thread Jim George
Folks, I wrote yesterday about a broken sane installation. Well I'm pleased to say that I now have sane working again but without GIMP. I elected to install the GIMP plugin when I did the CMMi (configure, Make, Make Install) bit but gimp doesn't appear to see the plugin.

[sane-devel] messed-up installation

2001-11-12 Thread Jim George
Folks, after a lot of heartache to get sane compiled and installed (successfully), it's now all messed up and won't work. The first hint was that Gimp had lost it's 'acquire' feature for my backend (Mustek_PP). It dawned on me that I had installed Ximian Gnome. The sane

[sane-devel] GIMP lpugin

2001-11-14 Thread Jim George
On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 19:14, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 07:18:47AM +0000, Jim George wrote: > > I elected to install the GIMP plugin when I did the CMMi (configure, > > Make, Make Install) bit but gimp doesn't appear to see the pl

[sane-devel] Mustek_PP Godd news, better news, bad news

2001-11-16 Thread Jim George
Folks, I'm not sure what to think. I've got my Mustek_PP 1200CP working on all my Linux clients to my Linux Server...Good News or what? I've got my Mustek_PP 1200CP working from my Windows client (using Xsane-WIN32) to my Linux ServerBetter News or what? The problem is that all instances

[sane-devel] Mustek_PP Godd news, better news, bad news

2001-11-16 Thread Jim George
nger wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi! > > Does this also happen with plain scanimage on your scanner server (as root)? > > Could you put somewhere on he internet such a scanned image and the > output of > > SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=

[sane-devel] Mustek_PP Godd news, better news, bad news

2001-11-17 Thread Jim George
On Sat, 2001-11-17 at 00:58, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > --- Jim George a > écrit : > Jochen, > > > > here's the output from SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=128 > > scanimage -T > > > > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of mustek_pp to > > 128. >

[sane-devel] Mustek_PP Godd news, better news, bad news

2001-11-19 Thread Jim George
On Sat, 2001-11-17 at 12:49, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi! > > The mustek_pp backend wasn't changed between 1.0.5 and 1.0.6, so this > shouldn't do much. From the output you've send, everything should work. > So again my questions, does scanning

[sane-devel] HP Photosmart 210 Digi Camera

2001-11-20 Thread Jim George
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 19:38, Sean Rima wrote: > Originally to: All > > Hello folks, > > Wondering if anyone has managed to use this camera with SANE. I cannot use > Gphoto as I dislike GUI and never install it. Sane maybe my only chance. It > appears to be a serial port Digi camera. > > Sean >

[sane-devel] Mustek_PP Good news, better news, bad news

2001-11-20 Thread Jim George
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 19:11, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi! > > Jim George wrote: > > | Something has gone wrong now. When I issue the command scanimage > > | out.pnm, as myself or root on the server, it scans bu

[sane-devel] Mustek_PP Good news, better news, bad news

2001-11-27 Thread Jim George
Jim On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 01:43, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi! > > Sorry, for the long delay, I haven't been online for some days... > > Jim George wrote: > > | Jochen, and anyone else who wants to chi

[sane-devel] SuSE RPM?

2003-12-14 Thread Jim George
Chaps, big favour time guys. I don't have the capacity to compile sane on my machine (physically no room for the compilation suite) and I have a Mustek 1200CP parallel port scanner which isn't compatible (without patches) the version that SuSE 8.0 comes with. So I was wondering if someone could

[sane-devel] saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished

2003-12-16 Thread Jim George
Hi, I have now installed the 1.0.13 RPM build for SuSE 8.1 on my box and it appeared to work in that I could do a scan. However I've since discovered that it isn't releasing the parallel port when a scan is finished (snip from /var/log/messages at the bottom). I have a Mustek 1200CP (CIS) scanne

[sane-devel] saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished

2003-12-18 Thread Jim George
attached. Also please find attached the contents of /var/log/messages (only those relevant to this problem). Thanks, Jim > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:10:46PM -0000, Jim George wrote: >> Can anyone give me an idea what is going wrong? > >> Dec 15 10:54:51 tassi sa

[sane-devel] saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished

2003-12-20 Thread Jim George
--=_20031220105159_23401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Jochen and Henning, I've been through several tests now and here are the results: 1) scanimage -L - works fine 2) scanimage -T - works fine 3) scanimage > /dev/null - starts fine then hangs 4

[sane-devel] saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished

2003-12-22 Thread Jim George
--=_20031222083820_21324 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Jochen and Henning, appologies if you have already seen this email but I've been having troubles with my mail so decided to re-post. I've been through several tests now and here are the resu

[Fwd: Re: [sane-devel] saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished]

2003-12-26 Thread Jim George
--=_20031226101338_12762 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Can anyone help me with the following? Jim Original Message Subject: Re: [sane-devel] saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished From: "Jim George&q

[sane-devel] saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished]

2003-12-26 Thread Jim George
PP=255 and saned -d128 and tried running scanimage -d net:localhost:mustek_pp:Mustek-1200CP but this failed, as did scanimage -d mustek_pp:Mustek-1200CP If you have any thoughts please let me know. Jim > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 10:13:38AM -, Jim George wrote: >> Ca

[sane-devel] saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished]

2003-12-26 Thread Jim George
(I didn't use SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_PA4S2=255 because it filled my disk up!). The result is attached. What's wierd is that all the file appears to say that it returned the scanner never released. Any ideas where I can go with this now? Thanks, Jim > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at

[sane-devel] mustek_pp trouble (was: saned doesn't release the parallel port when finished)

2003-12-26 Thread Jim George
--=_20031226222127_61890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 04:22:18PM -0000, Jim George wrote: ...SNIP... > > These are the last few lines: > > [saned] process_request: waiting for request >

[sane-devel] saned issues for remote scanner access

2004-03-03 Thread Jim George
currently selected device has an entry somewhere. > The name should be an exact match of what the backend returns as device > name. > > My list of critical bugs is getting too long for my liking (a handful, > but still) so I probably will take some time next week to fix the bugs &

[sane-devel] mustek_usb backend: scanning only once problem fixed

2004-03-03 Thread Jim George
ists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- Best Regards, Jim George Thanks for reading this email. - This email was sent using SquirrelMail. "Webmail for nuts!" http://squirrelmail.org/

[sane-devel] New Boeder Slimscan issue

2004-03-03 Thread Jim George
likely to be the scanner? I haven't actually tried this on a non-Linux environment yet so am quite prepared to believe that it is the scanner. -- Best Regards, Jim George Thanks for reading this email. - This email was sent using Squirre

[sane-devel] New Boeder Slimscan issue

2004-03-05 Thread Jim George
Hi Henning, please look here http://www.jsdmservices.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/sanetest.jpg Cheers, Jim Henning Meier-Geinitz said: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:12PM -0000, Jim George wrote: >> Scans appear to arrive with the first third of the scan a light colour >&

[sane-devel] New Boeder Slimscan issue

2004-03-06 Thread Jim George
too light. I'm better off with it as it was. Thanks anyway, -- Best Regards, Jim George Thanks for reading this email. - This email was sent using SquirrelMail. "Webmail for nuts!" http://squirrelmail.org/

[sane-devel] New Boeder Slimscan issue

2004-03-06 Thread Jim George
can see > if it's a backend problem. > I'm afraid it's the same under Windows. So it's looking like the scanner itself. -- Best Regards, Jim George Thanks for reading this email. - This email was sent using SquirrelMail. "Webmail for nuts!" http://squirrelmail.org/

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-03 Thread Jim George
is a 2.4.19 kernel and the backend home page says I need 2.4.21 or a new scanner driver. My problem is that I am unable to compile code so need pre-compiled versions of code for this scanner to work. Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance, Jim George

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-04 Thread Jim George
--=_20040204004429_73502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:18:41PM -0000, Jim George wrote: >> I have purchased the above USB scanner for use on my limited SuSE server. I have no room for de

[Fwd: Re: [sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE]

2004-02-04 Thread Jim George
Folks, not sure if anyone can help, or is even interested :) I have tried upgrading to kernel 2.4.21-168 but this knocks out my second pcmcia network card. I have now downloaded libusb-0.1.7-o.pm.o-i586.rpm but that doesn't appear to have worked either. When I run SANE_DEBUG_GT68xx=255 scanimag

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-04 Thread Jim George
Hi Henning and all, > Hi, > > Well, the version must be 0.1.6 or newer. As far as I know that > version number is not the same as the (libtool?) number of the library > (*-so.a.b.c). My libusb looks like this: /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4.3.0 > So does mine (since downloading it). >> I don't have th

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-06 Thread Jim George
Hi, > "ldd /path/to/libsane-gt68xx.so". That should print: > libusb-0.1.so.4 => /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x4002c000) > (or similar). > Yes it does. > Please show us the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v . > searching for SCSI scanners: checking /dev/scanner... failed to open (Invalid argument

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-08 Thread Jim George
--=_20040208205149_79248 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, >> > Please show us the output of sane-find-scanner -v -v . >> >> searching for SCSI scanners: > [...] >> searching for USB scanners: >> checking /dev/usb/scanner... failed to open (Inval

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-09 Thread Jim George
Hi all, > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:22:16PM -0800, Robert M. Riches Jr. wrote: >> Is there a chance this is related to the problem recently >> caused in Redhat 8.0 and 9 where a change to glibc caused >> sane-backends to fail to find scanners, because glibc >> had changed the search order

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-10 Thread Jim George
--=_20040210192135_67062 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, > > It should be enough if libsane-gt68xx.so supports libusb. > sane-find-scanner still won't find your scanner but that doesn't > matter. Just make sure that the version of libsane-gt68x

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-10 Thread Jim George
Hi, > No libusb support in this backend This is how it looks like with > libusb support: > > [...] > [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_init: couldn't open /dev/usb/scanner14: No such > device [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_init: couldn't open /dev/usb/scanner15: No > such device usb_os_init: Found USB VFS at /proc/bus

[sane-devel] Re: [sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-11 Thread Jim George
Hi Eddy, > > AFAIK, the .la files are only used by libtool when > compiling/linking against a library. They don't interfere > during normal operation. > > Do you have a /proc/bus/usb entry, ie. is the usb file system > mounted? (mount | grep usb) > You may have to load some usb modules first. I'm

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-11 Thread Jim George
hing. Are there other options/things I can check? Thanks, Jim > do you have the package libusb-devel installed? > > allan > > On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Jim George wrote: > >> Well, >> >> I deleted a load of applications so that I could install devel >> util

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-12 Thread Jim George
Allan, answers to your questions. > > do you have a file called /usr/include/usb.h ? No. Where can I get it? > > 1. usb support in the kernel makes you able to see usb stuff in the > output of lsmod and do things like insmod usb-uhci tassi:/usr/local/etc/sane.d # lsmod | grep usb usbserial

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-15 Thread Jim George
Hi Allan, >> > 4. the libusb header files are in /usr/include/usb.h and friends. >> these enable you to BUILD apps that use libusb support. >> >> Nothing returned from ls /usr/include | grep usb >> > > this is why you are unable to build sane with libusb support. the libusb > header files are not

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-17 Thread Jim George
Hi Allan and all, > you could try building libusb from source, look on your suse cds for the > devel package, or try to install a devel package from another linux > distro with the same libusb version number. > I found a libusb source package and therefore did the following: rpm -e libusb rpm

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-17 Thread Jim George
an comment out the lines that try to load it when they see your > scanner. (look in /etc/hotplug/usb.distmap or nearby for your vendor's > id) > > allan > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Jim George wrote: >

[sane-devel] scanimage -T complains on newly working Boeder Slimscan

2004-02-17 Thread Jim George
Folks, having finally got the above backend working, thanks to Allan Noah and Henning, I ran scanimage -T and got the following; can someone explain what's the likely problem? [gt68xx] sane_cancel: warning: scanned 18943 bytes, expected 9092325 bytes Cheers, Jim

[sane-devel] Boeder SmartScan Slim Edition on SuSE

2004-02-18 Thread Jim George
Hi Allan, yes its in the list of supported scanners, Boeder Slimscan Edition. Jim > > no problem man, or should i say, old chap... > > :) > > is this scanner in our supported scanners list, if not we need to add > it... > > allan > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Jim Ge

[sane-devel] More on the Boeder scanner (nearly there)

2004-02-19 Thread Jim George
Hi folks, thanks to Allan, Henning, and Eddy I've managed to install sane on SuSE 8.1 for the Boeder Slimscan edition scanner, along with xsane. I've configured it as per the man(ual)s and can get great scans as root (sane-find-scanner, scanimage, xsane, and gimp with the xsane plugin). However

[sane-devel] saned issues for remote scanner access

2004-02-21 Thread Jim George
--=_20040221234009_25920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Folks, I've got my Boeder Slimscan working nicely under linux with scanimage and xsane. However, I wish to use it to allow Windows laptops, running sanetwain by Herman Kuiper, to do remot

[sane-devel] saned issues for remote scanner access

2004-02-22 Thread Jim George
Hi Julien and all, I didn't need to rebuild, thankfully, please see below for the result. > > gdb /usr/sbin/saned >> run -d128 > [wait until it crashes] >> bt > [copy this output] #0 0x0804bb5e in process_request (w=0x80533e0) at saned.c:2003 #1 0x0804bcd2 in main (argc=2, argv=0xb5d4) at s

[sane-devel] saned issues for remote scanner access

2004-02-22 Thread Jim George
Hi all, Although I answered Julien's request for running saned in gdb I also followed your instructions and got the following. >> SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_PAS4S2=255 saned -d128 > Oops :) > If you ant to get debug output from the backend, use > SANE_DEBUG_GT68XX. SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_PA4S2 is for Mustek par

[sane-devel] saned issues for remote scanner access

2004-02-22 Thread Jim George
Hi Julien and all, > > Jim, is the error 100% reproducible ? If yes, could you add the > following lines in saned.c, decode_handle(), between lines 459 and 460? > Yes the error is 100% reproducible when saned is access from a remote host (it works fine when saned is accessed locally). Did you see

[sane-devel] saned issues for remote scanner access

2004-02-22 Thread Jim George
Hi Julien and all, > Jim, could you try with just > > DBG (DBG_ERR, "decode_handle: w->status: %d, h: %d, num_handles: %d\n", > w->status, h, num_handles); > > This way we should get an idea of what's going on... > [saned] decode_handle: cancel: error while decoding handle argument (h=0, Succ

[sane-devel] saned issues for remote scanner access

2004-02-23 Thread Jim George
Hi Henning, > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:30:47PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: >> "Jim George" wrote: >> >> > [saned] process_request: waiting for request >> > [saned] process_request: got request 8 >> > [saned] decode_handle: w-&

[sane-devel] saned issues for remote scanner access

2004-02-23 Thread Jim George
--=_20040223214042_21157 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, > > I don't know. Can you post the complete log including the sane_init > messages from the gt68xx backend? Maybe even some more debugging: > > SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 SANE_DEBUG_GT68XX=255 sa

[sane-devel] scanner not recognised

2004-02-27 Thread Jim George
of the 2 scanners is detected when I start XSANE. > > Any help welcome, I'm rather new in linux, so my question might sound > stupid but I am really stucked. > > Thank you > > Paul Frisson -- Best Regards, Jim George Thanks for reading this email. --