On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:11:52 +0200
wicked witch wrote:
> I am trying to use the coolscan3 backend to scan film strips with a Nikon LS
> 50 in batch mode. It works ok for the first frame, but subsequent frames are
> scanned shifted.
> I would love to fix it for the LS 50, but I would need some p
Hi,
I am trying to use the coolscan3 backend to scan film strips with a Nikon
LS 50 in batch mode. It works ok for the first frame, but subsequent frames
are scanned shifted.
I would love to fix it for the LS 50, but I would need some pointers on how
to actually move the frame start point to a dif
Hi,
Ivan Fernandez wrote:
>>>Hello, and sorry if this is slightly off-topic. I've been thinking
>>>about buying a dedicated slide/negative scanner, but none of the models
>>>I've seen in the market seem to be supported by SANE. Could anyone give
>>>me recommendations about which film scanners w
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 22:50 -0500, Ivan Fernandez wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello, and sorry if this is slightly off-topic. I've been thinking
>>> about buying a dedicated slide/negative scanner, but none of the models
>>> I've seen in the market seem to
> >Hello, and sorry if this is slightly off-topic. I've been thinking
> >about buying a dedicated slide/negative scanner, but none of the models
> >I've seen in the market seem to be supported by SANE. Could anyone give
> >me recommendations about which film scanners work well under Linux?
>
> I
Johannes Berg wrote:
>On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 22:50 -0500, Ivan Fernandez wrote:
>
>
>>Hello, and sorry if this is slightly off-topic. I've been thinking
>>about buying a dedicated slide/negative scanner, but none of the models
>>I've seen in the market seem to be supported by SANE. Could anyone
> Hello, and sorry if this is slightly off-topic. I've been thinking
> about buying a dedicated slide/negative scanner, but none of the models
> I've seen in the market seem to be supported by SANE. Could anyone give
> me recommendations about which film scanners work well under Linux?
If "in th
--=-rP2sHD3Sq6jahPLpUwyT
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 22:50 -0500, Ivan Fernandez wrote:
> Hello, and sorry if this is slightly off-topic. I've been thinking
> about buying a dedicated slide/negative scanner, but none of the models
> I
Hello, and sorry if this is slightly off-topic. I've been thinking
about buying a dedicated slide/negative scanner, but none of the models
I've seen in the market seem to be supported by SANE. Could anyone give
me recommendations about which film scanners work well under Linux?
"Work well" is de
Sorry for my slow reaction - I have been on vacation.
The Canon FS2710S is an SCSI scanner with 2720 dpi resolution,
3 x 12 bit per pixel. It works under Linux and HP-UX.
Regards,
Ulrich Deiters
> I read a lot about Problems with film scanners and linux/sane. So I want to
The problems are mostly related to the front-ends, as there is no
really convenient way of removing the orange mask (for negatives) and
IR-based dust removal.
> ask for a supported film scanner with about 1600 or more
Florian Reichert schrieb am Samstag, 23. August 2003 15:17:
> Hello!
Hello Florian,
> I had a look in the db, but I don't know, wich are film scanners and
> wich not. It seems, that the most known film scanners are not or not
> well supported (minolta, nikon ...)
I use a Microtek Scanmaker 35tpl
Hello!
I read a lot about Problems with film scanners and linux/sane. So I want to
ask for a supported film scanner with about 1600 or more dpi. Who has any
experienc, wich scanner is supported well?
I had a look in the db, but I don't know, wich are film scanners and wich
not. It seems, that
Hi,
> BTW: The Acer ScanWit would be in your price range, I just don't know
> if it's supported by Sane.
There is an alpha backend available from Max Ushakov:
ftp://mccme.ru/users/ushakov/scanwit
Regards,
Oliver
--dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:44:35PM -0400, Roland Roberts wrote:
> > "Witold" =3D=3D Witold Paluszynski writes:
>=20
> Witold> The resolution need not be mu
--=-oP6b6kXLKMUpMnH4kE1W
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 09:52, Ulrich Deiters wrote:
> I think the HP photo smart scanner is within our price range, but
> I cannot recommend it: It grips negative strips or slides with
> rubber transport r
> "Witold" == Witold Paluszynski writes:
Witold> The resolution need not be much above 2000 dpi. The price
Witold> however, is of concern, anything above $500 is out of
Witold> question.
If you find something which meets these constraints, please let
everyone know. As someone w
I think the HP photo smart scanner is within our price range, but
I cannot recommend it: It grips negative strips or slides with
rubber transport rollers, so you can be sure that you will have
transport problems once the rubber surface show some wear. Furthermore,
you cannot handle slides in glass
Witold,
> I am planning to purchase a modern, quality, but amateur film scanner
> for home use: some negatives but mostly slides, framed and unframed.
> My PC is a Sun/SPARC (SunBlade 100) so I need to rely on sane for
> software. From the sane documentation I understand there is no chance
> for
Hi,
I am planning to purchase a modern, quality, but amateur film scanner
for home use: some negatives but mostly slides, framed and unframed.
My PC is a Sun/SPARC (SunBlade 100) so I need to rely on sane for
software. From the sane documentation I understand there is no chance
for me to use any
20 matches
Mail list logo
