[sane-devel] Devcom

2001-08-31 Thread Richard Hebert
Yes it is. Two things. a ) They have one less chance to make a sale to me .. : ) ( i want to get another scanner so Devcom is scratched off ) b ) It shows their hardware is not for professional use.A serious hardware maker would know that Linux is the OS to have if you want a pe

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-08-07 Thread Roger L.S. Griffiths BSc (Hons)
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 20:40, Simon Munton wrote: > Hi Roger, > > It looks like the Blackwidow scanner has had its SCSI vendor and product ID > changed. You can get the artec backend to 'pretend' that a scanner it finds > has a different vendor/product ID - see the sane-artec man page. Basically

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-07-26 Thread Chris Pinkham
>From cpinkham Wed Jul 25 15:52:43 2001 Subject: Re: [sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner) To: sane-de...@mostang.com Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:52:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <001f01c11541$b00723c0$7a53dec2@simon> from "Simon Munton" at Jul 25, 2001 08:40:26

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-07-25 Thread Simon Munton
nt: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 1:22 AM Subject: Re: [sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner) On Tuesday 24 July 2001 21:05, Simon Munton wrote: > Hi Roger, > > Having had a look through the the driver off the Blackwidow site, I think > you'll find that this scan

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-07-25 Thread Roger L.S. Griffiths BSc (Hons)
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 21:05, Simon Munton wrote: > Hi Roger, > > Having had a look through the the driver off the Blackwidow site, I think > you'll find that this scanner is made by Artec, model AT12. Try the Artec > backend. It lists the AT12 as fully working. Tried it, but get "invalid argument

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-07-24 Thread Paul Stear
On Monday 23 July 2001 23:24, Roger L.S. Griffiths BSc (Hons) wrote: > Hi there, > > Anyone used this scanner with SANE? > > If so what backend and version of SANE? > > I have tried the PIE backend with Sane 1.0.4 under SuSE Linux 7.1 > Professional (x86 platform) and an Adaptec AHA-2940A SCSI card

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-07-24 Thread Paul Stear
On Monday 23 July 2001 23:24, Roger L.S. Griffiths BSc (Hons) wrote: > Hi there, > > Anyone used this scanner with SANE? > > If so what backend and version of SANE? > > I have tried the PIE backend with Sane 1.0.4 under SuSE Linux 7.1 > Professional (x86 platform) and an Adaptec AHA-2940A SCSI card

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-07-24 Thread Simon Munton
uot; To: Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 11:24 PM Subject: [sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner) Hi there, Anyone used this scanner with SANE? If so what backend and version of SANE? I have tried the PIE backend with Sane 1.0.4 under SuSE Linux 7.1 Professional (x86 platform)

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-07-24 Thread Peter McConnell
On 23 Jul 2001 23:24:48 +0100, Roger L.S. Griffiths BSc (Hons) wrote: > Hi there, > That is the blackwidow 9636 with the unique 3-d scan head (according to what pc jan 2000) I have a webstar 9636 that was sold by Tandy Australia which is a mustek_pp. I would guess that yours is a mustek scsi. the

[sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner)

2001-07-23 Thread Roger L.S. Griffiths BSc (Hons)
Hi there, Anyone used this scanner with SANE? If so what backend and version of SANE? I have tried the PIE backend with Sane 1.0.4 under SuSE Linux 7.1 Professional (x86 platform) and an Adaptec AHA-2940A SCSI card. Many Thanks -- Roger L.S. Griffiths, BSc (Hons) Gott würfelt nicht (God does