>From cpinkham Wed Jul 25 15:52:43 2001 Subject: Re: [sane-devel] DevCom Black Widow 9636 HiRes (SCSI Scanner) To: sane-de...@mostang.com Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:52:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <001f01c11541$b00723c0$7a53dec2@simon> from "Simon Munton" at Jul 25, 2001 08:40:26 PM Reply-To: cpink...@corp.infi.net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] Content-Length: 1353
For a second, I thought this was my email which had been blocked because I sent it from an address not subscribed to the list. Rather than requoting what was said there I'll just add a few things here. Roger, If you try this and it works, please let me know and I can setup the Artec backend to auto-detect your scanner model and you won't have to have these two entries in your artec.conf file. Also confirm which modes the scanner works in so I can update my webpage and the artec.desc file so other BlackWidow users will know that particular model scanner is supported. > It looks like the Blackwidow scanner has had its SCSI vendor and product ID > changed. You can get the artec backend to 'pretend' that a scanner it finds > has a different vendor/product ID - see the sane-artec man page. Basically, > you need to add the following lines to artec.conf just before the device > line that applies to your scanner: > > vendor ULTIMA > model AT12 > > You might want to add the device name that corresponds to your scanner. Chris ***************************************************************************** ** Chris Pinkham Linux v2.2.18, Sane v1.0.4, Cajun v3.0-8 ** ** cpink...@infi.net http://www4.infi.net/~cpinkham/ ** ***************************************************************************** -- Chris ***************************************************************************** ** Chris Pinkham Linux v2.2.18, Sane v1.0.4, Cajun v3.0-8 ** ** cpink...@infi.net http://www4.infi.net/~cpinkham/ ** *****************************************************************************
