[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage - SOLVED

2006-09-06 Thread Warren Post
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:15:36 -0600 Warren Post wrote: > Wolfram > is suspecting a broken rpm, and I think I'll grab the latest stable > source and build it myself. Building 1.0.18 from source solves the problem. Apparently the rpm I was using has an issue. Thank you Wolfram and everyone for the h

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage

2006-09-04 Thread Warren Post
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:57:29 +0200 "Wolfram Heider" wrote: > On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:19:24 +0200, Gerhard Jaeger > wrote: > > here you are - your version does not support the LiDE25!!!, you > > still use 1.0.16. Please check your installation - probably some > > crappy double installation. I don

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage

2006-09-04 Thread Wolfram Heider
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:19:24 +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > Hi, > > On Saturday 02 September 2006 22:13, Wolfram Heider wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post >> wrote: >> >> > My Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 is found by sane-find-scanner but not by >> > scanimage (using sane-fron

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage

2006-09-04 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi, On Saturday 02 September 2006 22:13, Wolfram Heider wrote: > On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post > wrote: > > > My Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 is found by sane-find-scanner but not by > > scanimage (using sane-frontends-1.0.13-2mdk, xsane-0.97-2mdk, and > > sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage

2006-09-04 Thread Warren Post
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:53:55 +0200 "Wolfram Heider" wrote: > The Canon Lide 25 should cause no problems with SANE. Agreed. Googling, it is clear that many people use that scanner with SANE with no problems. I agree that the problem appears to be with my installation. > And it seems > your SANE-

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage

2006-09-04 Thread Wolfram Heider
Warren, >> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post >> wrote: > > [snip] >> > 3. Modified /etc/sane.d/plustek.conf per man sane-plustek. >> > Specifically, I added the line "[usb] 0x04a9 0x2220". I have tried >> > both "device auto" and not having a device line. >> >> the entry should read

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage

2006-09-04 Thread Warren Post
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:13:49 +0200 "Wolfram Heider" wrote: > On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post > wrote: [snip] > > 3. Modified /etc/sane.d/plustek.conf per man sane-plustek. > > Specifically, I added the line "[usb] 0x04a9 0x2220". I have tried > > both "device auto" and not havin

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage

2006-09-04 Thread Wolfram Heider
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post wrote: > My Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 is found by sane-find-scanner but not by > scanimage (using sane-frontends-1.0.13-2mdk, xsane-0.97-2mdk, and > sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.20060mdk on Mandriva 2006). So far I have done > the following: > > 1. Downl

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 found by sane-find-scanner but not scanimage

2006-09-01 Thread Warren Post
My Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 is found by sane-find-scanner but not by scanimage (using sane-frontends-1.0.13-2mdk, xsane-0.97-2mdk, and sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.20060mdk on Mandriva 2006). So far I have done the following: 1. Downloaded and installed a version of sane-backends (1.0.17) that supports