-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20070206/2b44250d/attachment.pgp
From kitno...@gmail.com Tue Feb 6 19:37
some special setting I
need to set?
Thanks,
Guy
On 11/25/06, sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25 not found on Win XP
To: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Message-ID: <200611241404.37138.gerh...@gjaeger.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&
open `/usr/local/lib/sane/cygsane-avision-1.dll' (No
such file or directory)
[dll] load: couldn't find backend `avision' (No such file or directory)
[dll] load: searching backend `apple' in `/usr/local/lib/sane'
[dll] load: trying to load `/usr/local/lib/sane/cygsane-apple-1.dll&#
Thanks.
After setting the debug variables I am now getting the following messages
for each backend:
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of dll to 7.
[dll] sane_init: SANE dll backend version 1.0.12 from sane-backends 1.0.18
[dll] sane_init: reading dll.conf
[dll] add_backend: adding backend `net'
[d
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> When I scan a photo with:
>
> $ scanimage --mode Color > photo.pnm
>
> , it comes out striped and faded, and I get the output:
>
> [gt68xx] gt68xx_afe_cis_auto: setting exposure reached limit
>
> . Can anyone suggest a possible solution?
> It's an USB Boeder SmartScan o
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:15:36 -0600 Warren Post
wrote:
> Wolfram
> is suspecting a broken rpm, and I think I'll grab the latest stable
> source and build it myself.
Building 1.0.18 from source solves the problem. Apparently the rpm I was
using has an issue. Thank you Wolfram and everyone for the h
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:57:29 +0200 "Wolfram Heider"
wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:19:24 +0200, Gerhard Jaeger
> wrote:
> > here you are - your version does not support the LiDE25!!!, you
> > still use 1.0.16. Please check your installation - probably some
> > crappy double installation. I don
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:19:24 +0200, Gerhard Jaeger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 02 September 2006 22:13, Wolfram Heider wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post
>> wrote:
>>
>> > My Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 is found by sane-find-scanner but not by
>> > scanimage (using sane-fron
Hi,
On Saturday 02 September 2006 22:13, Wolfram Heider wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post
> wrote:
>
> > My Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 is found by sane-find-scanner but not by
> > scanimage (using sane-frontends-1.0.13-2mdk, xsane-0.97-2mdk, and
> > sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:53:55 +0200 "Wolfram Heider"
wrote:
> The Canon Lide 25 should cause no problems with SANE.
Agreed. Googling, it is clear that many people use that scanner with
SANE with no problems. I agree that the problem appears to be with my
installation.
> And it seems
> your SANE-
Warren,
>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post
>> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> > 3. Modified /etc/sane.d/plustek.conf per man sane-plustek.
>> > Specifically, I added the line "[usb] 0x04a9 0x2220". I have tried
>> > both "device auto" and not having a device line.
>>
>> the entry should read
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:13:49 +0200 "Wolfram Heider"
wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post
> wrote:
[snip]
> > 3. Modified /etc/sane.d/plustek.conf per man sane-plustek.
> > Specifically, I added the line "[usb] 0x04a9 0x2220". I have tried
> > both "device auto" and not havin
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:40:42 +0200, Warren Post
wrote:
> My Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 is found by sane-find-scanner but not by
> scanimage (using sane-frontends-1.0.13-2mdk, xsane-0.97-2mdk, and
> sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.20060mdk on Mandriva 2006). So far I have done
> the following:
>
> 1. Downl
My Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 is found by sane-find-scanner but not by
scanimage (using sane-frontends-1.0.13-2mdk, xsane-0.97-2mdk, and
sane-backends-1.0.17-2.1.20060mdk on Mandriva 2006). So far I have done
the following:
1. Downloaded and installed a version of sane-backends (1.0.17) that
supports
On Thursday 19 January 2006 17:27, Andrew Barr wrote:
> On Monday 16 January 2006 08:24, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > As I already mentioned, I could not test anymore, but this looks like the
> > good old calibration problem. You might want to apply the attached patch
> > and try again.
On Monday 16 January 2006 08:24, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
[...]
> As I already mentioned, I could not test anymore, but this looks like the
> good old calibration problem. You might want to apply the attached patch
> and try again.
My LiDE 25 came in the mail yesterday. I did a quick test scan and
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> On Sunday 15 January 2006 20:45, Andrew Barr wrote:
>
>>I am considering purchasing one of these, my LiDE 20 is broken and
>>apparently they don't sell those anymore. I notice that in the
>>compatibility list it's only "good" whereas the LiDE 20 is "complete".
>>What is mis
On Sunday 15 January 2006 20:45, Andrew Barr wrote:
> I am considering purchasing one of these, my LiDE 20 is broken and
> apparently they don't sell those anymore. I notice that in the
> compatibility list it's only "good" whereas the LiDE 20 is "complete".
> What is missing in terms of feature co
Hi,
Success! Thank you very much all of you for your help.
Henning, your comment about having two copies installed got me
thinking. I know I didn't have two scanimage programs but I decided
to read more about 'make' to check I was doing things right. I read
somewhere that doing 'sudo make inst
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:10:03PM +, Chris wrote:
> [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_init: can't stat /dev/usb/: No such file or directory
> [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_init: found 0 devices
This looks like SANE was compiled without support for libusb.
Otherwise you would get messages about all USB devic
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:47:13PM +, Chris wrote:
> export SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=12
> export SANE_DEBUG_DLL=12
export SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB=255
> [plustek] usbDev_open(auto,0x04A9-0x2220) - (nil)
> [plustek] sanei_usb_open failed: No such file or directory (2)
> [plustek] open failed: -1
E
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:50:37AM -0700, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
> Some expert will probably jump in with a better explanation, but yeah, I read
> in one of the man pages that a TV card can interfere. Sane is capable of
> treating a TV card as a scanning device (doing frame capture, I presu
Gerhard,
Thank you very much for your reply. I remember originally the dev
files for libusb were not installed on Ubuntu. This meant that
sane-find-scanner didn't find any devices. I realised this was the
problem, installed the dev files, redid the ./configure and forced it
to re-make everythin
Hi,
On Monday 21 November 2005 15:47, Chris wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've recently bought a Canoscan LIDE 25 and managed to get it working
> on my Ubuntu 5.10 laptop using the CVS code. Unfortunately I can't
> get the same scanner working on an Ubuntu 5.10 desktop machine using
> the same procedur
Hi there,
I've recently bought a Canoscan LIDE 25 and managed to get it working
on my Ubuntu 5.10 laptop using the CVS code. Unfortunately I can't
get the same scanner working on an Ubuntu 5.10 desktop machine using
the same procedure. I would really appreciate someone helping me make
sense of t
HEY HENNING,
THANKS ALOT FOR THIS SOLUTION AFTER MORE ORE LESS 5 HOUERS I READ THIS HINT AND
EVERYTHING WAS SOLVED :)
ALOS THANKS ALOT FOR ALL THE WORK YOU AND THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM ARE DOING
ALL THE BEST
SAM
> But what is sanei_access_lock and why does it fail?
Read the archive of this lis
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:46:56PM +0200, Daniel Mang wrote:
> Thanks for the quick and helpful answer. The scanner is working now. I used
> the snapshot, disabled locking and otherwise followed all the instructions in
> Plustek-USB.txt.
> Although what it says there about using modprobe sca
Hello Henning
Thanks for the quick and helpful answer. The scanner is working now. I used
the snapshot, disabled locking and otherwise followed all the instructions in
Plustek-USB.txt.
Although what it says there about using modprobe scanner to ascertain if the
scanner device driver is loaded i
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:44:30AM +0200, Daniel Mang wrote:
> I read the email exchange regarding LiDE 25 in the july 2005 sane-devel
> mailinglist archives but could not understand if the problem was really
> resolved at that time. I also read the september and october email exchanges
> o
Hello
I read the email exchange regarding LiDE 25 in the july 2005 sane-devel
mailinglist archives but could not understand if the problem was really
resolved at that time. I also read the september and october email exchanges
on sane-devel regarding LiDE 25 and tried my best to understand them
On Thursday 29 September 2005 19:19, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> No firewall/packet filter involved? From your first log it really
> looks like something blocks the data port.
>
Thanks! I removed the firewall on that machine and remote scanning via saned
now works perfectly.
Thanks Henning
C
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 05:32:24AM +0800, Stephan February wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2005 09:49, Stephan wrote:
> > However under remote scanning saned still locks up after what sounds like
> > "a) motor initialization and b)turning the lamp on".
> >
>
> I've found some previous repo
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 09:49, Stephan wrote:
> However under remote scanning saned still locks up after what sounds like
> "a) motor initialization and b)turning the lamp on".
>
I've found some previous reports of saned having timing issues.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-d
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 03:49, Stephan wrote:
>
> Thanks Henning
>
> On Wednesday 28 September 2005 03:47, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > I don't know if that makes any difference but have you tried the
> > development version of SANE (e.g. a CVS snapshot) yet? The plu
Thanks Henning
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 03:47, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> [...]
>
> I don't know if that makes any difference but have you tried the
> development version of SANE (e.g. a CVS snapshot) yet? The plustek
> backend has been changed since incooperation of this patch.
>
I've
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:08:42AM +0800, Stephan wrote:
> I have read the previous threads on this scanner, and managed to obtain one
> of
> the above units. I would like to put some development time into getting this
> to work properly. Currently I'm facing the following problems:
>
> Wi
Hello
I have read the previous threads on this scanner, and managed to obtain one of
the above units. I would like to put some development time into getting this
to work properly. Currently I'm facing the following problems:
With this patch
(http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 03:22:16 +0200
"a...@scii.nl" wrote:
> with great interest i have followed this 'discussion' :
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2005-July/014027.html
>
> i've just applied the patches mentioned in that discussion to
> sane-backends 1.0.16 (what are the cor
with great interest i have followed this 'discussion' :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2005-July/014027.html
i've just applied the patches mentioned in that discussion to
sane-backends 1.0.16 (what are the correct permissions
for /var/lock/sane btw ?)
export SANE_DEBUG_PLUST
/5c5769e4/signature.pgp
From gerh...@gjaeger.de Mon Jul 18 09:59:44 2005
From: gerh...@gjaeger.de (Gerhard Jaeger)
Date: Mon Jul 18 10:00:17 2005
Subject: [sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE 25
In-Reply-To: <42db57bc.5040...@web.de>
References: <1026275...@web.de> <200507181026.58517.ger
Hi Olaf,
On Monday 18 July 2005 08:22, Olaf Leidinger wrote:
> Hi Gerhard,
>
> >
> > could you please try:
> > export SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=255 ; scanimage -L
> > and send us the output?
>
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of plustek to 255.
> [plustek] Plustek backend V0.49-6, part of sane-backe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerhard,
>
> could you please try:
> export SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=255 ; scanimage -L
> and send us the output?
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of plustek to 255.
[plustek] Plustek backend V0.49-6, part of sane-backends 1.0.15-cvs
[plustek] Retriev
Hi Olaf,
On Sunday 17 July 2005 12:09, Olaf Leidinger wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > apply the patch, recompile install and see what happens.
> > I assume, that the device is more or less a LiDE30...
>
> Well, scanimage -L still doesn't find the scanner - sane-find-scanner does.
could you please try:
ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
> apply the patch, recompile install and see what happens.
> I assume, that the device is more or less a LiDE30...
Well, scanimage -L still doesn't find the scanner - sane-find-scanner does.
What might I use to extract those "USB logs" from w
--Boundary-00=_QDn1Cp0H087tSdX
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thursday 14 July 2005 14:58, Olaf Leidinger wrote:
> Hallo!
>
> > that's because the device-id is not known by the backend.
> > If you want to, I can crea
Hallo!
> that's because the device-id is not known by the backend.
> If you want to, I can create a patch, which needs to be applied to the
> latest CVS-version of SANE. Then recompile and install the stuff to
> see if it works.
Okay, great! But I can test it soonest on saturday, as I'm currently
Hi,
On Thursday 14 July 2005 13:15, Olaf Leidinger wrote:
>
> Hello List!
>
> I just unpacked my brand new "CanoScan LiDE 25", which isn't listed on
> the supported devices list (probably because it's released a month ago).
>
> Well, here is what I found out:
>
> It seems to use the same chips
Hello List!
I just unpacked my brand new "CanoScan LiDE 25", which isn't listed on
the supported devices list (probably because it's released a month ago).
Well, here is what I found out:
It seems to use the same chipset as LiDE 20 (LM9832/3). So it might be
supported by the plustek-backed. What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello List!
I just unpacked my brand new "CanoScan LiDE 25", which isn't listed on
the supported devices list (probably because it's released a month ago).
Well, here is what I found out:
It seems to use the same chipset as LiDE 20 (LM9832/3). So it
49 matches
Mail list logo
