Hi Stef, I understand you're asking for a log from somebody with a LiDE
120 doing a preview. Me, I'd be happy to see my LiDE 120 supported by
SANE. So if you tell me what to do and how to even make my LiDE 120 do
anything loggable, I'll see if I can provide that. Unfortunately, I am
not much of a L
uot; appears. I have also
attached a screen shot of the file manager about SANE directory and the
files contained in it. Now help!
Actually I had also problems with this scanner under Windows, they got
solved with XP service pack 2.
Jochen
-- next part --
An HTML attachment
Hi,
since a few days this file is gone (it used to be in the sane group
home-directory on alioth). Does somebody know why?
best
-jochen
uot; was "usb"...and compiler output said
so, too.)
All the best
and thank you again
Jochen
l be here to help by providing any info you
need to improve it beyound the current state if you want to do that.
All the best!
Jochen
tached the requested log-file.
(Since it is too big for the list to accept it I'll only send it to you
and just re-post the message to the list without it)
Happy new year!
Jochen
>lexmark.pnm
>
> The debugging information I need will be in the lexmark.log file.
>
> Regards,
> Stef
Thank you!
I will do this and report back - but it will be some days until then.
What I do ask myself (and you - both rather rhethorical...) is: why does
the older version work when there is missing info on the sensor?
All the best!
Jochen
different
versions of sane-backends (1.0.18-r6 and 1.0.20).
I named them by version-number, the first is from the older but working
version, the last is from the not working recent version.
Thank you for looking into it.
Please ask for additional info should that be needed.
Jochen
ps:
and sorry for
urce files - just
some udev-rules are patched in and the "-fno-strict-aliasing"
compiler-flag is added in version 1.0.20.
Regards
Jochen
try google for that:
http://google.com/search?q=page-scanner%20site:lists.alioth.debian.org
regards
-- jochen
ATTR{idVendor}=="04f9", ATTR{idProduct}=="01e5", MODE="0664", GROUP="lp",
ENV{libsane_matched}="yes"
===
Thank You for Your work.
Yours sincerely
Jochen Lauber
idea, i'll include this on the saned
troubleshooting webpage soon
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
thanks for reporting this. It's fixed in CVS now.
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
I guess the bug is that in sane_close the scanner_devList entry
corresponding to the open handle is destroyed, and later in sane_exit
all scanner_devList entries are destroyed again.
I guess in sane_close, the entry should be be destroyed, but only marked
as free or so.
regards
-- jochen
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/libc/Heap-Consistency-Checking.html
If possible, use valgrind -v scanimage -d epjitsu to generate the
backtrace, it will be more informative.
regards
-- jochen
?
lp0 is a printer device. So I guess you have an parallel port printer to
usb printer converter. That can't work with the scanner.
I don't know whether there is something like 'generic parallel port over
usb'.
Better buy a new scanner.
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
that's a common problem of many backends, please file a bug at our
alioth bug tracker. See bug #303681
http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=303681&group_id=30186&atid=410366
for a similar bug.
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
what does ls -l /dev/bus/usb/001/002 show?
Assuming you don't have appropriate access rights to this device, does
changing access rights help?
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
is saned actually executed when you run it from inetd? can you connect
with telnet for example?
regards
-- jochen
:libusb:aaa:bbb or /dev/usb/aaa/bbb
regards
-- jochen
before
the motor moves?
Now after approx. 30 working hours, this seems a very big job, which I can
only continue after receiving some valuable hints.
Yours sincerely
Jochen
Hi,
Circuitsoft Development wrote:
> Why not? Almost every other daemon I've seen does.
that's not the point here. I don't want to have some more or less
unrelated registry entry to enforce a design decision for future versions.
regards
-- jochen
velopment and
the net protocol (hopefully) won't be compatible to the current one.
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
I've forwarded your mail to the sane mailing list. I'm not sure who
should be the contact person, so it's probably the best to discuss this
on the list.
regards
-- jochen
Alex Austin wrote:
> Jochen,
>
> I am working on building an integrated product which runs SA
Hi,
tj wrote:
> What else if anything do I need to do?
did you check the troubleshooting guide at
http://penguin-breeder.org/sane/mustek_pp/#trouble ?
regards
-- jochen
x27;s a good idea to start hacking something before it's
clear we have a standard that will support us for the next few years.
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
Dura-Zell wrote:
> To exclude any hardwarproblems I tested the parallelport with some other
> devices:
you don't happen to have the possibility to try your scanner with the
original drivers?
regards
-- jochen
onfigure
that in the BIOS?
regards
-- jochen
driver.pl?model=lide60
regards
-- jochen
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Should we change the links in sane-hp.man and sane-microtek2 to your
> page?
i just checked those links and they don't work anyway. what about
replacing them with the current ppscsi homepage, and also adding a link
to my page?
kind regards
-- jochen
kernel/download/
kind regards
-- jochen
rial about this scanner -
without that it's kinda worthless to start in the first place
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
what's the output of
SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=128 scanimage -L
kind regasds
-- jochen
Hi,
saned isn't a stand-alone program, but you have to run it using
(x)inetd. See http://penguin-breeder.org/sane/saned/ or the saned and
sane-net man-pages.
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
I've commited a patch to CVS that introduces an option "no_epp" to
mustek_pp.conf. When this option is defined, the EPP protocol is not tried.
This works around a known bug in the parport kernel code of linux that
causes the mustek_pp backend to hang on some systems.
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
could you try to set your BIOS settings to something else than EPP? Like
SPP oder standard mode or something?
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi there,
ok, I'm back home again :-)
let's see, can you send me your modprobe.conf?
kind regards
-- jochne
Hi,
it's /etc/modprobe.conf in fedore core 3 :)
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
try to pass the following options to the module parport_pc, for example
in /etc/modules.conf
options parport_pc irq=7 dma=3 io=0x378
it should then detect the port correctly. Let's see whether that helps :)
kind regards
-- jochen
Philip Moller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No, I d
only affects fc1
Do you have ECP activated in your BIOS? If you have ECP something like
this should show up in your dmesg:
$ dmesg | grep parport
parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 1
[PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA]
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
could you please send the output of
SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_PA4S2=128 scanimage -L
kind regards
-- jochen
ge like this means that the address check of only_from or
no_access failed.
do you have a default { } section in your xinetd.conf?
maybe there are some examples for this options which disable the saned
service
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
I assume you are configured xinetd to execute saned as user saned (or
similar)
does saned still work, if you execute it like this
# su - saned
$ saned -d128
(i.e. running as user saned)
kind regards
-- jochen
Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:37:55 +0100
>
Hi,
Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
> After each connection attempt there is a /tmp/saned.7876.stderr file.
well, what is in that file?
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
have you tried the troubleshooting section at
http://penguin-breeder.org/sane/saned/ ? I'm pretty sure that should
solve your problem
kind regards
-- jochen
Hello all,
is somebody already working on a backend for Tevion/Medion MD 6190?
I'd try to contribute something, but my C-skills are very low.
Jochen
--
Jochen Gaedcke
Hi Eddy,
what do you think about this patch: http://c0ffee.org/stuff/mustek_pp.diff
Eddy De Greef wrote:
> PS: I think we should do something about this. Users should get a
> warning that the backend isn't functional already during compilation.
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
I'm not yet sure what this bug is, but I have the feeling it's a kernel
bug which makes the driver hang. Could you try to update the kernel? As
far as I know there's a new kernel from SuSE available via online update.
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
Hauke Zuehl wrote:
> [mustek_pp] sane_init: invalid driver name ``cis1200''
this error message is a bit mis-leading, this probably means the scanner
is not found.
Could you try (as root)
sane-find-scanner -v -v -v -p
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
this appears to be a problem with either libieee1284 or the kernel. I'll
try to investigate into this a little further...
kind regards
-- jochen
e module for your card in the kernel config:
CONFIG_PPSCSI and some CONFIG_PPSCSI_* variable
they should be under scsi drivers in your kernel config.
kind regards
-- jochen
regards
-- jochen
bug in the SuSE kernel
regards
-- jochen
wrong value 0x00. To me this looks like the scanner got
confused or something.
Eddy, could you have a look at this?
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
I'm still trying to reproduce your problem. Basically, the old (1.0.7)
code was just copied over and patched to support libieee1284. I guess as
soon as I have an 1015/01 scanner, I should be able to fix this.
i'll let you know as soon as I have something
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
Julien Langer wrote:
> with mustek_pp 0.13-beta I used:
ehrm, I meant the old one, the 1.0.7 config
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
Julien Langer wrote:
> [mustek_pp] ccd_init: found scanner on port ``parport0'' (ASIC id 0xa5, CCD 1)
Hum, my SE 6000 P identifies itself with 0xa8 + CCD 0. Could you please
attach the old (working) mustek_pp.conf (without all the comments)?
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
Ok, I'll test this tommorow (this scanner is in the basement and it's
late now...)
kind regards
-- jochen
Julien Langer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ScanExpress 6000 P doesn't work correctly with mustek_pp backend
> 0.13-beta.
Hi,
Eddy De Greef wrote:
> It looks good.
> I'm all for including it (but I may be a bit prejudiced :-).
It's included since yesterday (just before feature freeze :-)
kind regards
-- jochen
er is present, you have to give the switch -p to
sane-find-scanner if you want your scanner detected.
Example:
# sane-find-scanner -p -q
found possible Mustek parallel port scanner at "parport0"
Any comments on this?
kind regards
-- jochen
--070004080404080406040306
Con
atch in respect to the hardware support. I will however try to adopt
the patch to the SCSI mid-level API.
If you are willing to test this patch, I'd be grateful to receive any
kind of feedback.
You can get the patch from
o http://penguin-breeder.org/kernel/download/
kind regards
-- jochen
Hi,
The bug you're describing should be fixed in CVS. Please try using CVS
snapshot version.
Why it behaves like a 600 CP scanner, I have no idea.
best regards
-- jochen
from xinetd. Please make sure that user "sane" has appropriate
access rights to your USB/SCSI/parport/whatever devices.
regards
-- jochen
hello,
what exactly is confusing you? please give some more details, so we can
probably help you.
regards
-- jochen
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 08:45:17AM +0800, kent E. wrote:
> does any have any docs on how to setup a network scanner using saned, i
> am following the one in http://www.p
Hello,
another idea. May it be, that there are any saned or scanimage running
after the first scan attempt?
regards
-- jochen
Jim George wrote:
> Eddy and Joachen,
>
> when I tried to run saned under gdb I got the following output. Doesn't
> look good does it? Can you tell
EI_PA4S2=6 scanimage --test
regards
-- jochen
for fd 0 with value 0
> [sanei_pa4s2] sanei_pa4s2_enable: disable port 'parport0'
here the port is released again (at least it should be)
can you actually scan with SANE and your scanner? This looks all very
strange to me...
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
if you're only using saned to allow non-root users to scan, you could
aswell solve this with correct access rights to /dev/parport0
regards
-- jochen
Wolfgang Fabics wrote:
> Thanx a lot, Henning... you gave me the right idea. It's a local
> resolver/DNS config problem...
Hi,
does this also happen when you scan from command line, i.e. using scanimage?
regards
-- jochen
Hi,
sorry for the lately unreliable operation of the mailing list search
engine. I'm experiencing disk space shortage at the moment, I hope I can
fix that within a few days.
best regards
-- jochen
This patch also includes support for auto probing the port for both CCD
& CIS scanners.
Please test and report (if any) the bugs :)
Missing (ccd) parport scanners are now 600 dpi ones, those with ASIC
1505 and A3EP... (but they weren't supported by the old mustek_pp_ccd
code either)
--=.E(ZvrHD6M:2+ys
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
yes, it's true, and it just shouldn't work.
regards
-- jochen
[David A Iacobellis]
> I read on another site that ccd scanners were disabled in the sane
> 1.0.10 backend and only
ssing the (x)inetd setup and doesn't mention
the possibility of using passwords
Testing your scanner:
There's an option --test for scanimage
that's it :)
regards
-- jochen
--=.Ck,JUCF/u'4.N7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
bject. Otherwise you'll hear me scream ;-)
Well ofcourse it just would be a fallback option. Not all systems come
with libieee1284 and I'd like to keep the overhead to install SANE for
mustek_pp as low as possible.
regards
-- jochen
--enigC23D0D5E5B47D942DBAEFBFB
Con
have to install
libieee1284 (and have configure detect it) [recommended] or enable
direct port io (also with configure).
What about including libieee1284 into the SANE distribution? I'd
volunteer on keeping it up to date.
best regards
-- jochen
--enig5F795099F5F25C456C69E563
Co
citly with
--enable-parport-directio if you don't have the libieee1284 installed.
Otherwise it won't be compiled anymore.
any comment is welcome
regards
-- jochen
--030003090207040009070707
Content-Type: application/gzip;
name="sanei_pa4s2.tar.gz"
Content-Transfer
kend exports tons
of 'illegal' symbols, i'll fix this before code freeze...
regards
-- jochen
--enigC5068C84F9E9AC538F851276
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
PUs, 512MB ram, 2x4GB
SCSI discs and 100mbit internet connectivity.
best regards
-- jochen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The man page sane-mustek_pp contains examples for your scanner. Don't
forget to uncomment the mustek_pp line in your dll.conf too.
regards
- -- jochen
Hans Krueger wrote:
> what should that mustek_pp.conf file should look like for Mustek
to be attached to a
> single parallel port.) If the switch is in the wrong position scanimage
> can't detect the scanner, but the switch is in the correct position.
You could try to connect the scanner directly to your pc... if that
doesn't work I don't know more things to try..
re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
that's a working configuration for me:
option io-mode alt_lock
option niceload
port 0x378
option use600
option strip-height 16
option wait-bank 700
option wait-lamp 15
does this work for you?
regards
- -- jochen
Mertens Bram wrote:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Mertens Bram wrote:
> Do I simply add this line to the end of the file?
> The section
> # Use this option for 600 dpi scanners
> # for example ScanExpress 1200 ED Plus
> #option use600
yes, that's it
regards
- -- jochen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
hum, i nearly forgot.. you're using a 600dpi scanner, there's a special
option for this in the config file. use600 (see the man-page)
do you have that option set?
regards
- -- jochen
Mertens Bram wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-26 at
at shed any light?
not really...
could you try
scanimage --mode Gray --resolution 100 > test.pnm
does this produce a correct image?
regards
- -- jochen
- --
...and I doubt complaining to the author will get you
anything but a free procmail rule.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Mertens Bram wrote:
> [mustek_pp] attach: asic 0xa5, ccd 01
That appears to be a 600dpi scanner, for those only grayscale scanning
is supported? can you scan grayscale pictures?
regards
- -- jochen
- --
...and I doubt complaining to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
does scanimage -L show your scanner? If yes, could you please send me
the output of the following command:
SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=128 scanimage -T
regards
- -- jochen
- --
...and I doubt complaining to the author will get you
anything but a free
ost interesting part here... and it's nearly
midnight again... I'll answer the rest next week (i'm off over the
weekend), so you have at least a first answer and don't need to feel
ignored :)
regards
- -- jochen
- --
...and I doubt complaining to the author will get you
http://sane.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/cgi-bin/driver.pl
The mailinglist search engine is (as always) available at
http://sane.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/htdig/index.html
both are linked from http://sane.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/
comments are welcome
regards
-- jochen
--
...and I doubt complaining to the au
the
> model including backedn and manufacturer links and by which version
> it's supported. Eg, first check stable, then cvs, then external
> drivers.
>
> Can anyone do this?
Yes, me... i'll set this up at
http://sane.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/scanner.pl in some hours
Hi,
this scanner is supported by the current development version of the
mustek_pp backend, more details (including the backend) are available from
http://penguin-breeder.org/?page=mustek_pp
regards
-- jochen
Rick Seitz wrote:
> Is there a backend for this EPP scanner. I see there is a 1200
ists to help users with such problems.
btw. you already have your procmail rule, it sorts your mail to
$MAILDIR/Mailing\ Lists/sane
regards
-- jochen
--
...and I doubt complaining to the author will get you
anything but a free procmail rule.
--enig97ABF95867FD8DFC70AE985C
Conten
;s hard to tell whether the config is
right or not. However, it might help to add "protocol = tcp" to the sane
block in xinetd.conf and/or "sane 6566/tcp" to /etc/services.
There is a little page about saned at penguin-breeder.org/?page=sane-net
btw.
regards
-- jochen
Robert Kl
debian/rules file per configurare il backend di
gphoto2. Esempio: includi l'opzione --with-gphoto2 nel ./configure)
regards
-- jochen
--
...and I doubt complaining to the author will get you
anything but a free procmail rule.
define
the port as described in the configfile /etc/sane.d/mustek_pp.conf or
the man-page sane-mustek_pp
regards
-- jochen
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use my medion9848 scanner,attached to the parallel port,
> under linux (redhat 7.3). It is a mustek scanner. My problem
ers.
Ah, we have a volunteer here! Btw, it's hard to write newbie guides, if
nobody reads them... ;-)
Well, stay tuned, sooner or later a driver for your scanner will pop up.
regards
-- jochen
--
...and I doubt complaining to the author will get you
anything but a free procmail rule.
using the
parallel port directly and not the parport API (which didn't exist back
when I wrote the driver...) T'will come sometime, I promise :)
regards
- -- jochen
- --
...and I doubt complaining to the author will get you
anything but a free procmail rule.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
...)
regards
-- jochen
[Kristen Doyle]
> I am trying to get it working on an linux box when i try though the
> following comes up
>
> Linux 2.4.18
>
>
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of mustek_pp to 128.
> [mustek_pp] init: SANE v1.0.8, backend v1.0.9-devel
> [mustek_p
Can we assume ppl are smart enough to know
where their tcpd is installed to?
I think yes. If nobody objects I'd change this in the man-page tommorow.
regards
-- jochen
--
"I'd rather die before using Micro$oft Word"
-- Donald E. Knuth
(asked whether he'd
Greef/ - the 600CP is
a CIS scanner...). Using the newer backend is the better choice btw...
regards
-- jochen
[TP Reitzel]
>
>
> I'm using a Mustek 600 CP parallel port scanner. I've downloaded,
> compiled, and installed sane-backends-1.07 in addition to xsane-0.85
> fo
ek_pp homepage, the old
page now just redirects to the new url.
regards
-- jochen
--
"I'd rather die before using Micro$oft Word"
-- Donald E. Knuth
(asked whether he'd reinvent TeX in the light of M$ Word)
GnuGP public key for jochen.eisin...@gmx.de:
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
