Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> - geniusvp2: Nobody volunteered to move it into CVS and maintain it
> there. Julien reported that the "geniusvp2 doesn't release ppdev"
> problem is still there.
Hi,
I'm the current maintainer of the geniusvp2 backend. Due to lack of
time, I haven't worked on i
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-- next part
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 10-libsane.rules
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 29058 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060521
I neglected to add my libusb-0.1.12 information to the previous long
configuration description, which apparently directly affects the udev
device node mapping, permissions, etc.
I also found this forum comment:
"What *should* happen is that the udev rules in
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules get
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2006-05-21 19:02, Nikolas Arend wrote:
>
>> seeing that more and more scanner models of the LiDE series become
>> supported... is there any progress for the LiDE 80? I can't help coding
>> atm, but I could test the backend. The LiDE 80 is still listed
Hi,
On 2006-05-21 19:02, Nikolas Arend wrote:
> seeing that more and more scanner models of the LiDE series become
> supported... is there any progress for the LiDE 80? I can't help coding
> atm, but I could test the backend. The LiDE 80 is still listed as
> unsupported, but I guess its chipset
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody tested the "Canon LiDE 40" with the genesys backend? I guess
> it works, but it's still listed as "untested" in our lists.
>
> Please tell us if it works (or not).
>
> Bye,
> Henning
>
>
Hi,
seeing that more and more scanner models of the LiD
Hi,
Has anybody tested the "Canon LiDE 40" with the genesys backend? I guess
it works, but it's still listed as "untested" in our lists.
Please tell us if it works (or not).
Bye,
Henning
Hi,
On 2006-02-27 13:26, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> > Thanks. I haven't looked at the actual code yet, just some formal
> > things:
>
>
> [..]
>
> ok, I will modify the license. please drop me a note when you'll have
> reviewed the code so I can send the new version just once.
Sorry for the
Hi,
On 2006-04-18 14:42, Michael Schwipps wrote:
> I'm writing a small client application and use saned.
> The tests of the client use then pnm-backend.
> There seems to be a bug in this backend.
Sorry for the long delay for answering.
I just had a quick look at the ocde but I couldn't find any
Hi,
On 2006-04-20 20:46, Alfred Egger wrote:
> I also an owner of the 4200f and I searched for information of the Chips
> inside this scanner a while ago. According to this site the chips are:
[...]
> Maybe someone could integrate this information on the site I noticed above.
Thanks! Your inf
Hi,
On 2006-05-13 21:01, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> another problem I think I found on this patch is at about line 1525 of the
> patched file, where it is "i = (xfer_len_in && 0x3f);" while it should be
> "i = (xfer_len_in & 0x3f);" with a single ampersand.
Ok. Could you (or somebody else) post a pa
Hi,
On 2006-05-20 16:50, Fibonacci Prower wrote:
> >Just use sane-backends 1.0.17 to generate the udev rules file. There
> >is no need to run make or make install in this case, just copy the
> >rules file to the appropriate location.
>
> Still nothing. I've added my user account to the scanner gr
Hi everybody,
As already discussed some weeks before, it's time for a new release of
sane-backends.
This is the proposed timetable for the release of sane-backends 1.0.18:
2006-06-11 Feature freeze
2006-06-25 Code freeze
2006-07-02 Release
The dates may move a few days as I may not be available
Hi,
On 2006-05-09 22:07, Jon Chambers wrote:
> Any idea where select.h is on HPUX? (select is a POSIX call so I guess it
> is somewhere?) I suspect that these issues are likely to be common to
> most network scanner backends so maybe sanei_tcp.h would be the correct
> place for this kind of #
14 matches
Mail list logo
