Hi, On 2006-04-18 14:42, Michael Schwipps wrote: > I'm writing a small client application and use saned. > The tests of the client use then pnm-backend. > There seems to be a bug in this backend.
Sorry for the long delay for answering. I just had a quick look at the ocde but I couldn't find any obvious bug, at least not in sane_open. However, the pnm backend is obsolete anyway. Is there any reason not to use e.g. the test backend? > If I open the first device pnm:0 it's ok. I can read all options of this > device. Then I try to open pnm:1. The reply state is "device busy" - also ok > for me. > If I now reread the options of pnm:0 there is a error (see subject line). > I can get some options, but always the next get-request after option 2 > (filename) fails. Maybe the reason is that option 2 is the only > String-option. Could you show us the code (or part of it) you used to cause this error? Bye, Henning
