Hi, On 2006-05-13 21:01, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > another problem I think I found on this patch is at about line 1525 of the > patched file, where it is "i = (xfer_len_in && 0x3f);" while it should be > "i = (xfer_len_in & 0x3f);" with a single ampersand.
Ok. Could you (or somebody else) post a patch that includes my and your comments? I.e. that can't break support for the other scanners? And that is tested with the LS-50? Thanks, Henning
