Showork writes:
>Mandriva OS sees the scanner as Epson flatbed , but does not have
> the model. The exact model is not listed.
> libusb:004:005 is reported as the scanner.
FWIW, these numbers (may) change whenever you replug or power cycle
the device or reboot your machine. What are the per
Parag,
There is a physical locking mechanism (there is on the 20 & 60 anyway)
that you have to turn off before using the scanner - you have done that
I presume?
Phil.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 17:33 +0530, Parag N() wrote:
> hello,
> Just got Canon LiDE 25 scanner to test it. I then plug
Am Montag, 17. April 2006 20:53 schrieb Daniel Bauer:
>
> Sorry if I'm completely wrong. I'm just trying to learn and understand...
Huu - I *am* completely wrong! And I am really embarrassed... I just now read
the comments in the program and saw your name there, Matto.
I feel really stupid
Am Montag, 17. April 2006 19:39 schrieb Matto Marjanovic:
thank you Matto, for taking your time, too!
> >From: Daniel Bauer
> >Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:08:06 +0200
>
> ...
>
> >I've added the above in "microtek.c" and compiled again. Now there's much
> > more output (all done as root):
>
Hi,
On 2006-04-17 18:18, Dexter Filmore wrote:
> I'll try the increased buffer - but: mustek.conf resides in /etc/sane.d/, I
> thought saned was only for network scanner access?
> Or is sane.d not related to saned and only means sane dir..?
> (/me <- sane-noob)
All configuration files are in /et
>From: Daniel Bauer
>Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:08:06 +0200
...
>I've added the above in "microtek.c" and compiled again. Now there's much
>more
>output (all done as root):
>
>venus:~ # export SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK=128
>venus:~ # echo $SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK
>128
>venus:~ # scanimage --dev
please take me off your mailing list thank you
Am Sonntag, 9. April 2006 13:31 schrieb Henning Meier-Geinitz:
>
> There is no difference in the SANE backend compared to the Windows
> driver. The only difference seems to be that with some SCSI cards,
> Linux seems to be a little bit slower or has a little bit more latency.
>
> There are some tip
...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20060417/a38e6265/attachment.htm
From li...@daniel-bauer.com Mon Apr 17 16:08:06 2006
From: li...@daniel-bauer.com (Daniel Bauer)
Date: Mon Apr 17 16:08:17 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] old Agfa DuoScan / Floating point exception
In
>Am Montag, 17. April 2006 12:18 schrieb Frank Zago:
>
>> Before changing the code, set SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK to 128 (type "export
>> SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK=128" under your shell) and redo your test. That will
>> give more information.
>> In particular get_scan_status() doesn't seems to return th
Hi,
On 2006-04-16 02:17, Wittawat Yamwong wrote:
> I would like to announce a stand-alone utility and SANE backend for Canon
> PIXMA MP150/MP170. The software is still in alpha stage and far from
> complete, because I've no ?programming information about the device at all.
> Though, it should s
Hi,
Thanks, forgot to mention that parts of the 2100U calibration was taken from
umax_pp_low.c from Stephane Voltz.
I forgot to add it to the license header.
Patrick.
On Monday 17 April 2006 08:45, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2006-04-16 11:54, Patrick Lessard wrote:
> > I've corr
Hi,
On 2006-04-14 10:45, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> The hp3500 backend has been added to the CVS some time ago, supporting
> HP 3500 series scanners.
>
> However, the pre-existing hp_rts88xx backend also claims to support
> these scanners (and a couple of others, non-3500).
>
> It seems that the hp3
Hi,
On 2006-04-13 15:32, Eureka Trek wrote:
> # Canon Inc.|LiDE 60
> SYSFS{idVendor}=="04a9", SYSFS{idProduct}=="221c", SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
Thanks. The LiDE 60 is already in our lists in the development version
of SANE.
Bye,
Henning
Hi,
On 2006-04-12 20:59, Roberson L. Brehm wrote:
> I have a little problem here, I try run sane in the Genius 1200X and
> they not find, I have buy this scanner but in the backends they have
> good status marked
>
> $ sane-find-scanner -q
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x0458, product=0x201d,
Hi,
On 2006-04-10 05:15, Tamkang wrote:
> I have a problem when want to debug the xsane to detect where the
> sm3600 was ? it appears no device ? first of all the xsane in
> /usr/bin/xsane it work, then if in /usr/local/bin/xsane, it cannot
> find out the scanner ? and I have question to ask , be
ne-devel/attachments/20060417/f9bba315/attachment.html
From henn...@meier-geinitz.de Mon Apr 17 12:45:25 2006
From: henn...@meier-geinitz.de (Henning Meier-Geinitz)
Date: Mon Apr 17 12:47:39 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] Umax Astra 2100U corrected calibration, again
In-Reply-To: <200604161154.241
Am Montag, 17. April 2006 12:18 schrieb Frank Zago:
> Before changing the code, set SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK to 128 (type "export
> SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK=128" under your shell) and redo your test. That will
> give more information.
> In particular get_scan_status() doesn't seems to return the correct
> i
Showork wrote:
>Mandriva OS sees the scanner as Epson flatbed , but does not have the
> model. The exact model is not listed.
> libusb:004:005 is reported as the scanner.
>This worked a month ago within an hour of bringing it home from the
> store. Not now because I changed/upgraded the O
Daniel Bauer wrote:
>Am Sonntag, 16. April 2006 13:11 schrieb Frank Zago:
>
>
>>Hello Daniel,
>>
>>
>>
>Hi Frank
>thanks for looking at my problem!
>
>
>
>>As indicated by the trace you provided, the crash happenned at line 4017
>>in microtek.c:
>> s->max_scsi_lines = SCSI_BUFF_SIZE / (s
Daniel Bauer wrote:
>Am Sonntag, 16. April 2006 16:17 schrieb Frank Zago:
>...
>
>
>>You should then be able to do the same (failing) test again and get the
>>same results.
>>
>>
>
>not exactly, the differences are:
>- the scanner is not detected anymore from a user prompt now (I've read ab
21 matches
Mail list logo
