26 Ìàé 2002 23:09, Âû íàïèñàëè:
This card works OK under my Red Hat 7.1 (kernel 2.4.17). Loadable module
ships with distributive, named dmx3191d.o.
> Problem
>
> My machine (RedHat 7.2) does not see the SCSI card.
>
> It is a DMX 3191 PCI-SCSI Host Adapter (under win98).
>
> An lspci sho
Hi,
> hi, after my scanner has been on for a couple of days,
> including xsane running the entire time. no restart, no reboot.
>
> a scanner is still found in /proc/bus/usb/devices (see below),
> but sane-find-scanner can no longer find it, and xsane can no longer
> connect to it. and after sane
Thus spake Sylvain Petreolle:
>
> > crw-r--r--1 root root 180, 48 Apr 11
> > 09:25 /dev/usb/scanner0
>
> Shouldn't you have write access to the device ?
Yes, but since I was screwing with it as root, I did have write access. I'd
twiddled the permissions a bit in the process---it wa
Hello Michael,
there still is another bug in the same routine with the variable x.
This variable has to be global because it is not allowed
to reinitiate the value each time when xsane_read_image_data()
is called. will be fixed in xsane-0.87
Bye
Oliver
mh wrote:
>
> Oliver Rauch, Sonntag,
I upgraded to RedHat 7.3 yesterday, which apparently has caused my Epson
610 to stop working. Now, sane-find-scanner detects it:
sane-find-scanner: found USB scanner (vendor = 0x04b8, product = 0x0103) at
device /dev/usb/scanner0
And it shows up in /proc/bus/usb/devices:
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 At
Hi,
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 07:06:53PM +0200, mh wrote:
> When you "scan" a lineart image with the pnm backend, sane_read will allways
> return the number of bytes requested by the frontend (or the number of bytes
> left in the input file). This is normally more than one scanline, because
> xsa
Hi,
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 05:02:52PM +0100, Major A wrote:
> I just tested on Alpha 21264 with Tru64 5.0 and DEC's C compiler
> V6.4-214. I assume that GCC would also work (I have yet to see a C
> program that compiles with cc and not with gcc).
Thanks. Does SCSI access work? USB? Dynamic loadi
Oliver Rauch, Sonntag, 26. Mai 2002 16:57:
> mh wrote:
> > after I could not find a bug in my backend, I dared to take a look at
> > xsane. I'm quite sure now, that there's indeed a bug in xsane. Please
> > take a look at the attached patch for xsane_scan.c.
> > I've tested this with the tevion, pn
--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:12:36PM +0200, Oliver Rauch wrote:
> PLEASE: Test sane-1.0.8-pre1 on all operating systems and architectures
> you have access to and send any bug reports and success reports t
Hi,
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:55:55PM +0200, Karsten Festag wrote:
> will be available for some time but I will move it to
>
> http://karstenfestag.gmxhome.de
I can't contact this address. I'm getting a timeout after some minutes.
bye,
Henning
Hi,
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 10:23:17AM +, Petter Sundlöf wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea how I can make sane 1.0.8 work on my system?
> :/
Update your make to version 3.79.1 or get the latest SANE CVS.
bye,
Henning
Hi,
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> If this works on my test-systems I will commit it to CVS.
As it seems to work on all my systems, it's in CVS now.
bye,
Henning
Hi,
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 01:03:48AM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> I have just found out that some of the recently added backends don't
> use status :new in their .desc files. These are the backends that use
> :alpha or :beta: canon_pp, canon630u, coolscan2, leo, teco1. test.desc has
> j
> Ok, I have tested the latest CVS (including the make fix) on
> everything I have access to:
>
> Linux 2.4
> AIX 4.3.3
> Irix 6.2
> Solaris 2.7
> FreeBSD 4.3
> OpenBSD 3.0
> NetBSD 1.5.1
I just tested on Alpha 21264 with Tru64 5.0 and DEC's C compiler
V6.4-214. I assume that GCC would also work
mh wrote:
>
> mh, Samstag, 25. Mai 2002 12:10:
> > > If this really is a xsane problem please tell me how I can reproduce this
> > > with e.g. the pnm backend.
> >
> > You are right, there are no problems with the pnm backend. Seems like I
> > have to look at the backend again.
>
> Hi again,
> af
Have you already checked this?
I think it's too late for 1.0.8! If not , Henning, can you do this change
before publishing 1.0.8?
Thanks
Gerhard
On Saturday, 25. May 2002 21:48, Ville Hallik wrote:
> There is a big problem with HP 2200C (and possibly other USB scanners
> supported by plustek
Hi,
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 01:26:34PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> I have no idea why the line number is wrong. The original author sent
> me his Makefile and it's identical to mine. He uses make 3.79 while
> mine is calles 3.79.1. I will try if this makes a difference later.
It's defin
Does anyone have any idea how I can make sane 1.0.8 work on my system?
:/
I am using kernel 2.4.18 on one machine and 2.4.17 on another, both Debian sid
(unstable) boxes. I have found it problematical to get the HP 4100C working.
One box (2.4.18) is using the standard uhci usb driver, and the other runs the
ohci driver. Any semblance of success has been with the UH
19 matches
Mail list logo
