Have you already checked this? I think it's too late for 1.0.8! If not , Henning, can you do this change before publishing 1.0.8?
Thanks Gerhard On Saturday, 25. May 2002 21:48, Ville Hallik wrote: > There is a big problem with HP 2200C (and possibly other USB scanners > supported by plustek backend). The difference between values stored in > registers 0x4e and 0x4f (pause/resume scan when buffer is n*x kB full) is > too small. Scanning starts normally but once the buffer gets full, the > scan head starts to cycle forward and backward too quickly (changes > moving direction many times per second). The problematic code is in file > backend/plustek-usbscan.c at lines 1085-1088: > > /* original code: > * a_bRegs[0x4f] = 1; > */ > a_bRegs[0x4f] = a_bRegs[0x4e] - 1; > > The easiest solution is to revert back to the original code (as in > sane-1.0.7) that just sets register 0x4f to one. >
