mh wrote: > > mh, Samstag, 25. Mai 2002 12:10: > > > If this really is a xsane problem please tell me how I can reproduce this > > > with e.g. the pnm backend. > > > > You are right, there are no problems with the pnm backend. Seems like I > > have to look at the backend again. > > Hi again, > after I could not find a bug in my backend, I dared to take a look at xsane. > I'm quite sure now, that there's indeed a bug in xsane. Please take a look at > the attached patch for xsane_scan.c. > I've tested this with the tevion, pnm and the test backend -> no problems.
Very strange. Your patch makes sense but I do not understand why it does work without the patch with the pnm backend. I have a more simple patch, please can you test it: -- fwrite(expanded_buf8, 1, len*8, xsane.out); ++ fwrite(expanded_buf8, 1, (size_t) (expanded_buf8ptr - expanded_buf8), xsane.out); Bye Oliver -- Homepage: http://www.rauch-domain.de sane-umax: http://www.rauch-domain.de/sane-umax xsane: http://www.xsane.org E-Mail: mailto:oliver.ra...@rauch-domain.de
