[sane-devel] a backend test

2002-03-17 Thread Frank Zago
New version available. - more tests - displays warnings and errors instead of coredumping - fixes http://fz.eryx.net/sane/#testsuite

[sane-devel] Addition of new(?) backends on TODO list

2002-03-17 Thread abel deuring
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > Hi, > > There is list of backends that should be included on the TODO list. As > some of the have been listed for a long time with no news, I'm > interested if the authors want to have them included in SANE at all. > Otherwise I would remove them from the TODO lis

[sane-devel] Addition of new(?) backends on TODO list

2002-03-17 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, There is list of backends that should be included on the TODO list. As some of the have been listed for a long time with no news, I'm interested if the authors want to have them included in SANE at all. Otherwise I would remove them from the TODO list. They will stay on the PROJECTS list and/o

[sane-devel] plustek-usbhw.c -> itimerval struct not known on OS/2

2002-03-17 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 06:34:51PM +0100, Franz Bakan wrote: > When I change plustek.c like this: > > ... > /* might be used to disable all USB stuff */ > #ifdef HAVE_USB_H > #define _PLUSTEK_USB > #endif This will also disable _PLUSTEK_USB for all other platforms that don't have libusb. But

[sane-devel] Split list of backend descriptions (sane-backends.html)?

2002-03-17 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, Currently all description files (backend/*.desc) are parsed by tools/sane-desc.el and included in one HTML page: doc/sane-backends.html (see http://www.mostang.com/sane/sane-backends.html). Backends not yet included are marked by a version in round brackets. I would like to split this list to

[sane-devel] Epson 1650 Photo problems, Epson-KAWA is no SANE frontend

2002-03-17 Thread Karl Heinz Kremer
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Thomas Wenrich wrote: > > > a) a Bug in the SANE epson.c (Patch enclosed) > >=20 > > The reset() function should never be

[sane-devel] Epson 1650 Photo problems, Epson-KAWA is no SANE frontend

2002-03-17 Thread Thomas Wenrich
--=-khV39RcL4JVwkvuD8pK/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi there, After some hours trying the new Epson-KAWA frontend I think this should NOT be called a 'SANE frontend'; it comes with it's own backend called 'epson' which looks incompatible to the epson backend currentl

[sane-devel] a backend test

2002-03-17 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 02:49:27PM +0100, mh wrote: > I had the same problem with the plustek backend; IMHO the assumption, that a > call to sane_control_option() must return SANE_STATUS_INVAL if the option is > inactive, is simply wrong. I'm not that sure. It depends on what's the meaning

[sane-devel] Split list of backend descriptions (sane-backends.html)?

2002-03-17 Thread Frank Zago
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Comments? Wouldn't it also be interresting to have the list sorted by manufacters/scanner models than by backends. Sorting the list by backends is only interresting for developers, not users.

[sane-devel] plustek-usbhw.c -> itimerval struct not known on OS/2

2002-03-17 Thread
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:46:35 +0100, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: Hallo Gerhard, thanks for the quick response. >is the function setitimer declared or even available? >If yes, what are the parameters... No, it's not available. But as there is no USB-Support for SANE (no libusb) at the moment and I have

Linking (was: [sane-devel] How to find out if USB is available for compilation)

2002-03-17 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:26:07AM -0600, Frank Zago wrote: [Patch to only link to libraries necessary for the specific backend] > Check that patch: http://fz.eryx.net/sane/#configure > > It works here. It greatly reduces the number of libraries linked with the > backends and the fontend. I

[sane-devel] Epson 1650 Photo problems, Epson-KAWA is no SANE frontend

2002-03-17 Thread Karl Heinz Kremer
--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 08:28:03PM +0100, Thomas Wenrich wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > After some hours trying the new Epson-KAWA frontend I think this should > NOT be

[sane-devel] new SANE hpoj backend

2002-03-17 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:07:12AM -0800, David Paschal wrote: > Hi, Henning. Attached is the new version of the hpoj.desc file with the > above changes. If it's OK now, then please add it to CVS. Ok, I have added it to CVS. Bye, Henning

[sane-devel] plustek-usbhw.c -> itimerval struct not known on OS/2

2002-03-17 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
Hi Franz, is the function setitimer declared or even available? If yes, what are the parameters... On Linux the struct itimerval is defined as: struct itimerval { struct timeval it_interval;/* timer interval */ struct timeval it_value; /* current value */ };

[sane-devel] remove me please

2002-03-17 Thread Oliver Rauch
David Mays wrote: > > Please remove me as a subscriber. Hi David, you have to do it yourself: take a look at the monthly coming mail "www.mostang.com mailing list membership reminder", there you find the registered email address and your password. Go to: http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listi

[sane-devel] Re: new SANE hpoj backend

2002-03-17 Thread David Paschal
Michael Piotrowski wrote in response to me: > With "photo-card" you're referring to memory cards as used by digital > cameras? Yes. They can be addressed in sectors (typically 512 bytes/sector), and typically contain a FAT or VFAT file system to store files (images or otherwise). HP PhotoSmart pr

[sane-devel] new SANE hpoj backend

2002-03-17 Thread David Paschal
This is a multipart MIME message. --==_Exmh_9089434120 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote in response to me: > > How about if I put something like "(external)" for the version? > > I think that's ok. > > > For the > > model field, I could be more specific abo