[sane-devel] Fwd: Re: USB-scanner... (EPSON 1250)

2001-12-17 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
Hi list, Gene Heskett asked me to forward his message, it may concern all of you who are interested in helping to make the EPSON 1250 work Gerhard -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: USB-scanner... Date: 16 Dec 2001 21:32:44 -0500 From: "Gene Heskett" To: "Jaeger, Gerhard

[sane-devel] I don't need help :-)

2001-12-17 Thread la...@doolittle.boa.org
Fellow hackers - I just got an Epson Perfection 1650U scanner, because it looked like a good match to SANE. I don't touch Microsoft products with a ten foot pole, so I didn't even open the shrink-wrap on the manuals and CDs that came with the scanner. After some fiddling (because I'm unfamiliar

[sane-devel] RFC: New sanei_pv8630 interface

2001-12-17 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 05:34:56PM -0700, Marcio Luis Teixeira wrote: > Is there any way to get XEmacs (not GNUEmacs) to do the "right > thing"? I've tried playing around with the configuration screen > for the C mode, but I can't get "Indent line or region" to convert > the text into the cor

[sane-devel] umax 1220P - cabling issue?

2001-12-17 Thread s...@bob-n.com
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 s...@bob-n.com wrote: > > > > Results were less than optimal: > > > > > > # /usr/local/src/sane-backends-1.0.6/tools/umax_pp -p -t 255 > > > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of umax_pp_low to 255. > > > [umax_pp_low] *** Direct I/O or ppdev unavailable, giving up *** > > >

[sane-devel] fillorder missing in scanimage

2001-12-17 Thread Peter Kirchgessner
Hi, the patch has been applied in CVS with some minor changes. --Peter Peter Kirchgessner wrote: > Hi Jacek, > > I would prefer that the bug in tifftopnm should be fixed. scanimage does > > Jacek Pliszka wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I posted a message some time ago but I got no reply. >> >> This

[sane-devel] HP ScanJet 4p "no sane devices found"

2001-12-17 Thread Peter Kirchgessner
Hi Bob, looks like your SCSI-communication is not ok. The printouts are correct in some parts, but contain also some garbage. sane-find-scanner should print found SCSI processor "HP C1130A 3540" at device /dev/scanner Can you check if you are using the right cable ? --Peter Bob Soukup wrote:

[sane-devel] HP ScanJet 4p "no sane devices found"

2001-12-17 Thread Bob Soukup
Thanks for the prompt reply, Peter. At your suggestion I tried another scsi cable but still get the same result. I don't know if the scanner has or needs a terminator, it worked OK without one when it was connected to a Macintosh. The scsi adapter is an Advansys 510 ISA. Think I could have a

[sane-devel] unsuscribe

2001-12-17 Thread herwig verbeke
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_001A_01C18709.C1E6FA40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --=_NextPart_000_001A_01C18709.C1E6FA40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-T

[sane-devel] fillorder missing in scanimage

2001-12-17 Thread Jacek Pliszka
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Peter Kirchgessner wrote: > the patch has been applied in CVS with some minor changes. Thank you very much! Best Regards, Jacek

[sane-devel] HP ScanJet 4p "no sane devices found"

2001-12-17 Thread Bob Soukup
I have an HP ScanJet 4p (C1130A) here that I can't get sane to recognize. I keep getting "no sane devices found". cat /proc/scsi/scsi gives: Attached devices: Host : scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00 Vendor: HP Model: C1 0A Rev: 35 Type:Processor Ansi SCSI rev

[sane-devel] umax 1220P - cabling issue?

2001-12-17 Thread stef
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 08:08:37PM -0600, s...@bob-n.com wrote: > > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 s...@bob-n.com wrote: > > > > One thing that may be worth trying, is to build the backend with no > > > ppdev > > > support (by undefining HAVE_LINUX_PPDEV_H in include/sane/config.h). The > > > backend

[sane-devel] umax 1220P - cabling issue?

2001-12-17 Thread s...@bob-n.com
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, stef wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 08:08:37PM -0600, s...@bob-n.com wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 s...@bob-n.com wrote: > > > > > > One thing that may be worth trying, is to build the backend > > > > with no ppdev > > > > support (by undefining HAVE_LI