Thanks for the replies. There should be a ticket opened for removing the
current instructions to use kash, whether or not they are replaced by
something else.
John
On 9 July 2018 at 23:48, Alexander Konovalov
wrote:
> Note that the Alnuth package for GAP switched from KANT to PARI/GP,
> with t
surprisingly, there are freash trac tickets proposing kash interface
improvements:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25488
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25494
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22982 (a meta-ticket where kash is a part
of)
I think it's unfortunately a wasted effort (as far as ka
Thu 2018-07-05 09:00:32 UTC, HG:
> In this graphic the second graphic p2 doesn't modify fontsize=8,
> but if I interchange it does, that means the second graphic is
> invalid to the command. Any help ?
> r=2/sqrt(n(pi));
> p1=plot(circle((0,0),r,color="red",fill=True,alpha=0.2,fontsize=8)+\
> po
I imagine it makes little sense to ask for open-sourcing the kash package
(have they sold stuff to somewhere, maybe?), although I might be wrong.
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 10:31:52 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> surprisingly, there are freash trac tickets proposing kash interface
> impro
In other words, either use BooleanPolynomialRing without
specifying GF(2), or use PolynomialRing and specify GF(2).
If you set
sage: xxz = ['x%d'%(i) for i in range(1, 49)] + ['Z']
you have the choice between the following:
sage: V = PolynomialRing(GF(2), 49, xxz)
sage: V
Multiv
On 10 July 2018 at 10:48, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I imagine it makes little sense to ask for open-sourcing the kash package
> (have they sold stuff to somewhere, maybe?), although I might be wrong.
>
I could ask Michael Pohst, though he has retired.
John
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 10:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 10:58:45 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10 July 2018 at 10:48, Dima Pasechnik >
> wrote:
>
>> I imagine it makes little sense to ask for open-sourcing the kash package
>> (have they sold stuff to somewhere, maybe?), although I might be wrong.
>>
>
> I coul
Tue 2018-07-10 09:58:45 UTC, John Cremona:
>
> On 10 July 2018 at 10:48, Dima Pasechnik:
> >
> > I imagine it makes little sense to ask for open-sourcing the
> > kash package (have they sold stuff to somewhere, maybe?),
> > although I might be wrong.
>
> I could ask Michael Pohst, though he has re
On 10 July 2018 at 11:02, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 10:58:45 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10 July 2018 at 10:48, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>> I imagine it makes little sense to ask for open-sourcing the kash
>>> package (have they sold stuff to some
Yes sorry... I probably didn't copy and paste well.
r=2/sqrt(n(pi));
c = circle((0, 0), r, color="red", fill=True, alpha=0.2, fontsize=8)
That's what I do, r is the special for a perfect quadrature of circle. I
don't know RDF but seems to give the same result, thanks.
As you said the fontsiz
Note also that the OSCAR project has one of the original authors
of KANT/KASH. To quote Bill Hart's blog post about OSCAR:
https://wbhart.blogspot.de/2016/11/new-computer-algebra-system-oscar_20.html
> Prof. Claus Fieker is one of the original authors of the KASH/KANT system
> for algebraic numbe
On 2018-07-10, slelievre wrote:
> you have the choice between the following:
>
> sage: V = PolynomialRing(GF(2), 49, xxz)
> ...
> sage: V = BooleanPolynomialRing(49, xxz)
I think that's a very dangerous statement, as the boolean polynomial
ring is a *quotient* of the above polynomial
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22982 (a meta-ticket where kash is a
> part of)
>
Not at all! This is a native implementation of global function fields in
Sage.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this gr
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 6:01:39 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu wrote:
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22982 (a meta-ticket where kash is a
>> part of)
>>
>
> Not at all! This is a native implementation of global function fields in
> Sage.
>
That is wonderful! Note that most parts of the function fi
On Wednesday, July 11, 2018 at 10:35:28 AM UTC+9, Nils Bruin wrote:
> Note that most parts of the function field infrastructure doesn't make use
> of the fact that residue fields as finite (if you do it right, basically
> only the part that computes divisor class groups), so with a bit of ca
Hi folks,
Can anyone recommend a good tutorial for using sage Permutations and
groups? I am a complete newbie and haven't been able to figure out how to
do things with symmetry or permutation multiplications. I'm pretty sure
that sage would be a great help in understanding these things.
thanks in
16 matches
Mail list logo
