sting to sage-
devel to investigate further.
- Ryan
On Jun 30, 2:45 pm, Ryan Hinton wrote:
> Thanks for the reply! That's a perfect example of what I am doing
> now. Can I go one level higher and define my generating function as a
> product of terms *while leaving the actual de
Thanks for the reply! That's a perfect example of what I am doing
now. Can I go one level higher and define my generating function as a
product of terms *while leaving the actual degrees, coefficients, and
even the number of dimensions symbolic*. So instead of getting
something like
(5*x0*x1 +
I have a bevy of algebra/calculus to work through for my research. I
have been using Sage to check my derivation for specific instances,
but it would be great if Sage could help me *derive* the results in
the first place.
Here is a simplified example. (Hopefully the mixed math/LaTeX/Sage
syntax
Set the environment variable SAGE_TESTDIR to control this location.
The school IT staff pointed me the right direction. :-)
- Ryan
On Sep 2, 2:50 pm, Ryan Hinton wrote:
> I am working with our school IT staff to install Sage. I compiled it
> in a temporary location, they copied it
I am working with our school IT staff to install Sage. I compiled it
in a temporary location, they copied it to an "official" location (and
ran it once to regenerate path-dependencies), and now I'm trying to
run the doctests. But I get failures like the following because I
don't have write-acces
OK, this is now #6581. I assume it's just the
MPolynomialRing_polydict class missing the monomial_divides method.
Can anybody recommend a good approach for this?
Thanks!
- Ryan
On Jul 21, 12:44 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ryan Hinton wrote:
>
>
Are Groebner bases for multivariate polynomials over the symbolic ring
supposed to work? Here's what I get in Sage 4.0.1.rc2:
sage: R2. = SR[]
sage: I2 = [a*b+a, a*a] * R2
sage: G2 = I2.groebner_basis()
verbose 0 (2247: multi_polynomial_ideal.py, groebner_basis) Warning:
falling back to very slo
Martin,
Thanks for the reply. Did I mention I'm using 3.4.2? When I try
using mon // x instead of mon / x, I get an exception:
---
AttributeErrorTraceback (most recent call
last)
/home/ryan/.sa
aren't
mutable, subtraction isn't defined for them, and (x1**(-1)) gives a
FractionFieldElement again.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
---
Ryan Hinton
PhD candidate, Electrical Engineering
University of Virginia
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, se
random.random.
The workaround for me is simple: import shuffle from prandom instead
of random. But the larger questions remain, is this behavior
expected? Is it correct?
Thanks!
- Ryan
On Oct 11, 12:52 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 10, 5:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Ryan Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There must be an easier way to do this. In a Python class I have a list
> > of RealNumber elements, "fracs_list". I want to multiply them by a
> >
omputation without less than the
round and two type conversions?
Thanks!
---
Ryan Hinton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PR
What if I want to develop in certain sections (coding theory, maybe
some graph theory)?
On Mar 5, 3:38 pm, "Michael.Abshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ryan Hinton wrote:
> > I would like to use and contribute to Sage on my university's Linux
> > cluste
convenient way to reduce this size?
Thanks!
---
Ryan Hinton
rwh4s, domain virginia.edu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit
14 matches
Mail list logo
