I have about 6 TB of saved Sage objects that I would like to recover, so am
interested in testing the fix.
On Thursday, 20 August 2020 at 14:10:34 UTC+10 Paul Leopardi wrote:
> Done. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30402
>
> On Thursday, 20 August 2020 at 02:35:15 UTC+10 Nils Br
Done. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30402
On Thursday, 20 August 2020 at 02:35:15 UTC+10 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 at 5:24:48 AM UTC-7, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>>
>> See also
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sage-support/c/3WKui-LojKs/m/DgEPB
See also
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-support/c/3WKui-LojKs/m/DgEPBGF3AQAJ and
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28444
On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 22:17:40 UTC+10 Paul Leopardi wrote:
> Hello,
> I am currently trying to convert my Boolean-Cayley-graphs project from
> Python 2
Hello,
I am currently trying to convert my Boolean-Cayley-graphs project from
Python 2 to Python 3 Sage.
https://github.com/penguian/Boolean-Cayley-graphs/tree/23-port-to-python-3
I have succeeded in converting the code, but am having a tough time trying
to load objects that were saved by my pr
I have now reported this suspected bug as
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24282
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@google
Hi all,
Sometimes, especially with functions of 8 variables, the
BooleanFunction.truth_table() method with format='hex" gives wrong values
that are the wrong length.
I don't yet have a login to Trac. Should I obtain one and report the bug
there?
All the best, Paul
*Bug in BooleanFunction.trut
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 19:39:32 UTC+10, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> I think you need to import sage.all first, before importing anything
> else from sage.
>
Thanks, I think I figured out what you mean. I updated conf.py to contain
the following:
...
# If extensions (or modules to document wi
On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 19:39:32 UTC+10, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> I think you need to import sage.all first, before importing anything
> else from sage.
>
Thanks, in which file do you mean, every Python file that uses Sage, or
some specific file?
--
You received this message because yo
On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 23:35:37 UTC+10, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Sphinx needs to be able to import your modules to document them. There
> is nothing Sphinx-specific about this, it's just usual Python imports. I
> am assuming that your package works within Sage but not outside of Sage.
> That
ame prefix for templates and static dir [_]:
The project name will occur in several places in the built documentation.
> Project name: Boolean-Cayley-graphs
> Author name(s): Paul Leopardi
Sphinx has the notion of a "version" and a "release" for the
software. Each version
Hello,
I am trying to create HTML documentation for my Boolean-Cayley-graphs
project ( https://github.com/penguian/Boolean-Cayley-graphs ) that uses
Sage.
If I try to just use Sphinx, following the instructions at
https://codeandchaos.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/sphinx-autodoc-tutorial-for-dummies/
On Friday, 28 October 2016 02:49:16 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> In the general case, either -no-pie needs to be passed or cc needs to be
> invoked with -r rather than -Wl,-r.
>
> The corresponding trac ticket is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21782 ?
And the branch to use right now when
Hi again Dima,
For the record, see below.
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 00:46:06 UTC+10, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the best way to fix your issue is to fix
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21313
> This will allow is_isomorphic to use bliss or nauty.
> (In fact, IIRC checking for
On Thursday, 3 November 2016 04:58:11 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 11:57:20 AM UTC, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 20:08:20 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>>
>>> I must say I don't know w
On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 20:08:20 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I must say I don't know why these libgap.set_global and get_global are
> needed.
>
>>
>>
I used them to get my large matrices into libgap as globals. Trying to pass
them through a text based interface does not work.
Foll
n ] )'
>sage: gap.eval('AutGroupGraph(GG);')
>'Group([ (3,4)(6,7)(8,9), (2,3)(5,6)(9,10), (2,5)(3,6)(4,7),
>(1,2)(6,8)(7,9) ])'
>sage:
>
>(whereas if I use libgap.* I end up with the same error as you)
>
>This is now
>https://trac.sagemath.o
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 06:02:06 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I would do a check using GAP's Grape package, which allows for checking
> isomorphisms
> (it uses nauty as the backend)
> While there is no ready function to call Grape from Sage, this should be
> easy to write using e.g.
>
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 06:02:06 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I would do a check using GAP's Grape package, which allows for checking
> isomorphisms
> (it uses nauty as the backend)
> While there is no ready function to call Grape from Sage, this should be
> easy to write using e.g.
> li
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 06:02:06 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I would do a check using GAP's Grape package, which allows for checking
> isomorphisms
> (it uses nauty as the backend)
> While there is no ready function to call Grape from Sage, this should be
> easy to write using e.g.
> li
Hi,
I have attached the output file here. I am sorry that I have not put more
time into cleaning up the code and the output.
Once you figure out what the output is trying to tell you, you will see
that the relevant pairs of strongly regular graphs are isomorphic for dim=4
and dim=6, and also f
On Tuesday, 25 October 2016 05:55:42 UTC+11, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I am trying to run your script, but am getting
>
> IOError: did not find file
> 'boolean_dimension_cayley_graph_classifications.sage' to load or attach
>
> and indeed, there is no file so named in your github repo.
>
>
>
It i
le.tec.hkr.se/~chen/research/2-weight-codes/index.htm
>are not always correct.
Thanks, Dima.
The strongly regular graph parameters are always the same. The graphs
themselves are in some cases not isomorphic. In my next message I will post the
relevant output from my code.
--
Paul Leopardi https
On Monday, 24 October 2016 01:45:10 UTC+11, David Joyner wrote:
>
>
> I haven't looked at your code but are you comparing the SRG associated
> to the Boolean bent function and the graph associated to the incidence
> matrix of that graph?
>
>
I don't understand your precise meaning here, so I wil
On Monday, 24 October 2016 01:45:10 UTC+11, David Joyner wrote:
>
>
> I haven't looked at your code but are you comparing the SRG associated
> to the Boolean bent function and the graph associated to the incidence
> matrix of that graph?
>
> I don't understand your precise meaning here, so I w
Since asking the question "How should I determine if two strongly regular
graphs are isomorphic?" I have made great progress in classifying Bent
functions by their Cayley graphs.
That is, up until now. I have found two graphs which I was (emprically)
expecting to be isomorphic have different can
Thanks, that all works quite well.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
Hello,
I am trying to use global variables to control the behaviour of Python
functions called from Sage. (Yes, I know there is probably a better way to
do it, but I am still interested in what's going on here.)
If in foo.py I have
def bar():
print blah
def baz():
global zilch
zilc
Hello,
When I am using Sage from the command line on my own PC (SageMath version
7.2, Release Date: 2016-05-15) I can do:
sage: class myint(SageObject):
: def __init__(self, n):
: self.value = n
:
sage: p = myint(3)
sage: save(p,'p')
sage: q = load('p
Hello,
When I am using Sage from the command line on my own PC (SageMath version
7.2, Release Date: 2016-05-15) I can do:
sage: class myint(SageObject):
: def __init__(self, n):
: self.value = n
:
sage: p = myint(3)
sage: save(p,'p')
sage: q = load('p
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 02:00:03 UTC+10, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Also, do I get it right that you have a new "generic" construction of
> strongly regular graphs?
> As you know, we are collecting them - would you be interested in adding it
> into sage/graphs/generators/ ?
>
Sorry for the
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 02:00:03 UTC+10, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> In this case your graphs give rise to Hadamard matrices (take Seidel
> adjacency matrix), so if you get nonisomorphic Hadamard matrices then you
> get nonisomorphic graphs, but not the other way around, generally speaking.
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 00:14:10 UTC+10, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> Do you have the package bliss or nauty installed?
>
sage: is_package_installed('bliss')
True
sage: is_package_installed('nauty')
True
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-suppo
Hi all,
I am currently trying to use Sage to classify bent functions by their
Cayley graphs.
I have attached an example where I have two (256, 120, 56, 56) strongly
regular graphs, g and h, which are also canonical labels, such that g does
not equal h, and so g and h are not isomorphic.
It take
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 14:45:42 UTC+10, jori.ma...@uta.fi wrote:
>
> dig6_string() is only available do directed graphs, but a Graph made from
> DiGraph is just a graph with directions forgotten. So you can say
>
> DiGraph(g).dig6_string()
>
>
Is there a particular reason why you prefer DiGr
Hi,
I am seeing a problem where "g.is_isomorphic(h)" is taking an inordinately
long time, where g and h are graphs, even though
"g.automorphism_group().order() == h.automorphism_group().order()", and
"g.canonical_label() == h.canonical_label()" both take a reasonable time.
My main question for
Hi,
I am using Sage 7.2 built from sources.
If I save a BooleanFunction of 6 variables, it loads OK.
If I save a BooleanFunction of 8 variables, loading gives an exception
error message:
ValueError: (ValueError('the length of the truth table must be a power of
2',), ,
('22d222d2dd2d22d222d22
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 21:38:38 UTC+10, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:57:55 UTC+10, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>>
>>
>> The build now gets past the point where it failed previously.
>>
>>
> The build now fails in dochtml with a prob
Hi John,
Yes that branch fixes the problem.
On 22 July 2016 1:31:53 AM AEST, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 4:38:38 AM UTC-7, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:57:55 UTC+10, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 22:50:10 UTC+10, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 1:43:22 PM UTC+1, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>>
>> ERROR: The Sage installation tree has moved
>>
>> from /home/leopardi/sync/src-downloaded/sage/sage-7.2
>>
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 21:38:38 UTC+10, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>
> Before I do so, I will try an experiment: apply the patch to the existing
> sage-7.2 directory, and run make again.
>
>
The experiment apparently succeeded. The make ran to a successful
conclusion.
I could n
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:57:55 UTC+10, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>
>
> The build now gets past the point where it failed previously.
>
>
The build now fails in dochtml with a problem that looks like this WONTFIX
bug: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18891
and also looks like
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:21:14 UTC+10, Paul Leopardi wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:06:37 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Well do you have PYTHON set in your environment? I'm pretty sure that
>> there are a number of python-related e
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 08:06:37 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Well do you have PYTHON set in your environment? I'm pretty sure that
> there are a number of python-related environment settings that will cause
> problems
>>
>>
>>
I did have but the value of PYTHON in my environment
was
Attached config.log for brial-0.8.4.3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send em
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 22:42:57 UTC+10, Paul Leopardi wrote:
> I checked python2-2.7.10.p1.log and discovered a problem: I had DESTDIR
> set to "/home/leopardi/usr/local". As a result, there were lines like:
>
> (cd
> /home/leopardi/usr/local/home/leopardi/sync
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 19:57:56 UTC+10, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I guess having a systemwide python2 might be a way out, as well...
>
>
No, I have a system-wide python2. That was not the issue, as far as I can
tell.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 09:12:24 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> So is
> /home/leopardi/usr/local/home/leopardi/sync/src-downloaded/sage/sage-7.2/local/bin/python
>
> executable?
>
This is what I have at the point where the build fails:
leopardi@catawba:~/sync/src-downloaded/sage/sage-7.2
>From config.log I noticed that
PATH: /home/leopardi/sync/src-downloaded/sage/sage-PPA/sagemath/local/bin
PATH: /home/leopardi/bin
PATH: /usr/local/sbin
PATH: /usr/local/bin
PATH: /usr/sbin
PATH: /usr/bin
PATH: /sbin
PATH: /bin
PATH: /usr/games
PATH: /usr/local/games
PATH: /snap/bin
so just to be
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 02:09:20 UTC+10, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Try running ./configure before make.
>
I have now done the following and have attached config.log. I will next run
make and will report the results.
Why do the instructions in
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/sour
Hi all,
My build of Sage 7.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 failed in atlas-3.10.2, with an error
that I don't understand and don't know how to fix.
What should I be doing to obtain a successful build of Sage 7.2 from source?
All the best, Paul
DETAILS:
I downloaded sage-7.2.tar.gz to my home Linux box:
leopa
I also could not reproduce the problem with the worksheet you gave me. I
have reproduced it with the following worksheet
https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/80f4c9e7-8a37-4f59-82e7-aa179ec0b652/files/public/new-order.sagews
which leads me to believe that it is caused by a 'corrupted' worksheet. My
On Wednesday, 9 December 2015 12:21:07 UTC+11, William wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:41 PM, William Stein > wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Paul Leopardi > wrote:
> >> I have created a large worksheet at
> >>
> https://cloud.sagema
I have created a large worksheet at
https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/3c2a9143-d685-410f-995c-28f44056999f/files/bent-functions-duals-Cayley-graphs.sagews
with a public copy at
https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/80f4c9e7-8a37-4f59-82e7-aa179ec0b652/files/public/bent-functions-duals-Cayley-graphs
I am reposting a comment I just added to the topic, "Fwd: error in Sage" in
the hopes that it will be more likely to be seen this way.
Hi,
I have also just encountered the incorrect sign for BooleanFunction
walsh_hadamard_transform().
In addition, I would like to point out that the documentatio
Hi,
I have also just encountered the incorrect sign for BooleanFunction
walsh_hadamard_transform().
In addition, I would like to point out that the documentation at
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/cryptography/sage/crypto/boolean_function.html
agrees with the usual definition and not
Hi all,
I'm trying to exponentiate a matrix with a complex entry. The input
and output is below. Why does Sage give me 103993*I/33102 in the upper
right hand corner, and how can I get it to give me the right answer?
Also, how do I get it to use (eg.) RealField(100)?
Best, Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
56 matches
Mail list logo
