Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage 4.3.3 Fails To Build On 64 bit Linux System (gcc.4.4.2)

2010-03-27 Thread William Stein
2010/3/27 John Bussoletti : > Sage Dev Staff: > >  I downloaded sage 4.3.4 and tried to build from source on my Fedora Core 12 > system and found the same failure in trying to build Pari. > > So I fiddled and finally built Pari by hand, successfully,  lied to the > installation process by manually

[sage-support] Re: ndsolve??

2010-03-27 Thread Rajeev
Hi, sage has gsl as one of the included packages, which is very good for numerical solution of differential equations. have a look at examples on the wikipage - http://wiki.sagemath.org/interact/diffeq 'Vector Field with Runga-Kutta-Fehlberg' by Schilly is one of my favorites. i hope it will help.

[sage-support] Re: sage server problem

2010-03-27 Thread gerhard
The solution for me was to omit the serverpool=[...] argument -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-s

[sage-support] Re: Sage 4.3.3 Fails To Build On 64 bit Linux System (gcc.4.4.2)

2010-03-27 Thread John Bussoletti
Sage Dev Staff: I downloaded sage 4.3.4 and tried to build from source on my Fedora Core 12 system and found the same failure in trying to build Pari. So I fiddled and finally built Pari by hand, successfully, lied to the installation process by manually entering an appropriate entry in the ins

Re: [sage-support] Re: scipy+sympy=?

2010-03-27 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:14 AM, dabu wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mar 27, 12:41 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >> On 03/26/2010 11:40 PM, dabu wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> > On Mar 26, 10:00 pm, Minh Nguyen  wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:47 AM, dabu  wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> It would

[sage-support] Re: scipy+sympy=?

2010-03-27 Thread dabu
Hi, On Mar 27, 12:41 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > On 03/26/2010 11:40 PM, dabu wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > On Mar 26, 10:00 pm, Minh Nguyen  wrote: > >> Hi, > > >> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:47 AM, dabu  wrote: > > >> > > >>> It would be somehow more helpful if important sage components like > >>> si

[sage-support] Re: scipy+sympy=?

2010-03-27 Thread Jason Grout
On 03/26/2010 11:40 PM, dabu wrote: Hi, On Mar 26, 10:00 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi, On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:47 AM, dabu wrote: It would be somehow more helpful if important sage components like simpy and scipy are compatible by default and one does not have to play with namespaces.

[sage-support] Re: sage server problem

2010-03-27 Thread mark mcclure
On Mar 20, 3:15 pm, David Joyner wrote: > > On Mar 19, 11:37 am, gerhard wrote: > >> I tried to bring up a server on a new machine: > > >> compiled sage version 4.3.3 from scratch and tested it. > >> Starting the server with > >> notebooks_start.py > > Why do you want to do this instead of > $ sa