On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 at 01:28PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: RALPH THOMAS
> Date: Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:15 PM
> Subject: notebook
> To: Willian Stein
[...]
>
> You are a real Sage wizard.
I should hope William is a Sage wizard!
> Have you create
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 at 10:14AM -0700, ggrafendorfer wrote:
> OK, then I can run the server version of sage from my computer via
> ssh,
Just so you know: there's no "server version" or "non-server" version of
Sage. If you have a working copy of Sage, you can run a notebook server.
I also agree wit
On Apr 18, 12:35 am, Kevin Horton wrote:
> I am running sage 3.4 on OS X. I get the well known jsmath fonts
> messages when I try to view a notebook worksheet from my work
> computer. Our work PCs are so locked down that I cannot install
> additional fonts there, so I need to address this on
I think the original poster is asking if it's possible to have Sage do
something like this:
sage: a=unevaluated_integral(x^2,(x,0,1))
sage: a
integral(x^2,(x,0,1))
sage: a.evaluate()
1/3
But I don't think anything like this is currently possible, though I
would be happy to be proved wrong.
- kc
I am running sage 3.4 on OS X. I get the well known jsmath fonts
messages when I try to view a notebook worksheet from my work
computer. Our work PCs are so locked down that I cannot install
additional fonts there, so I need to address this on the server end.
I have spent hours reading the docs
In a sage notebook one can write:
%latex
$\int_a^b x dx$
to *see the integral*.
Or is other problem?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@g
Hi, I think that it is insecure to run sage on a server which is used
for other tasks (webserver, mail server, ).
At least run sage not under your or root account, otherwise you give
to the sage users all your privileges.
Better idea is to have one computer for Sage and nothing more. As
Jason
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>>
>>> William Stein wrote:
>>>
2009/4/15 William Stein :
> 2009/4/15 Jose Guzman :
>
>
>> Hi
Just some followup email, but with a question from the guy. He should
have written to sage-support.
-- Forwarded message --
From: RALPH THOMAS
Date: Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Subject: notebook
To: Willian Stein
Hi Willian,
Just getting back to you. BlueHost my server ha
Thanks! I really appreciate your help.
Mike
On Apr 17, 1:25 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, MikeF wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the explanation. Not being familiar with python, I had
> > no way of knowing wether it was Sage or python. The examples in Sage
> > tend to use
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, MikeF wrote:
> Thank you for the explanation. Not being familiar with python, I had
> no way of knowing wether it was Sage or python. The examples in Sage
> tend to use x, y & z as variable symbols so I naturally used them, as
> well. The logical construct of "print
Thank you for the explanation. Not being familiar with python, I had
no way of knowing wether it was Sage or python. The examples in Sage
tend to use x, y & z as variable symbols so I naturally used them, as
well. The logical construct of "print bool (symbol = symbol) should
then not be used, I ta
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:00 AM, MikeF wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Newbie issue.
>
> I'm new to Sage but was messing about with Westers logical inference
> problem ( x>=y, y>=z, z>=z) and then using == and = by itself in the
> bool function. I've simplified the logic and isolated what I believe
> to be an
Hi All,
Newbie issue.
I'm new to Sage but was messing about with Westers logical inference
problem ( x>=y, y>=z, z>=z) and then using == and = by itself in the
bool function. I've simplified the logic and isolated what I believe
to be an error in behavior, perhaps designed but ought to be warned
Hi,
thanks for the fast answer,
> It depends on what you want, exactly.
I just want a server where like sagenb.org where certain people can
perform calcultations,
I have an ssh account to our department server, in my home directory
on this server, there is a directoy called 'public_html' where f
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> ggrafendorfer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> where can I find some information about setting up a sage server from
>> my homepage,
>>
>> is it easy possible or is it a more complicated task?
>
>
> It depends on what you want, exactly. If you just want
ggrafendorfer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> where can I find some information about setting up a sage server from
> my homepage,
>
> is it easy possible or is it a more complicated task?
It depends on what you want, exactly. If you just want a server that
you can use to do calculations, then it is as eas
Hi,
where can I find some information about setting up a sage server from
my homepage,
is it easy possible or is it a more complicated task?
thanks for help,
Georg
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubs
No bother, please.
I found a page on googlegroups that has discussion about dsage on cluster.
Anyone using dSage on a cluster?
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu/browse_thread/thread/31b6be66ff32aa9f
This question would be more relevant there.
And also I found mailing list
http://groups.go
Gonzalo Tornaria has cleared up my confusion: Theorem 4.1 in the
undergraduate research paper is true for integer weights, but not for
half-integer weights. In particular, f(2*z) is not in M_{3/2}(8), as
was claimed. See
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-nt/browse_thread/thread/e84a0a7440625f1
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:14:13 +0100
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > Unfortunately, SuperCommutative isn't available in libsingular (yet,
> > hint hint...).
>
> It seems the command is implemented as Singular script and not in C. Thus
> until we have an interface to call Singular library code, there
Hi,
The following code gives inconsistent results in Sage notebook:
##
reset()
sigma_1p, sigma_3, sigma_eqp = var('sigma_1p, sigma_3, sigma_eqp');
eqn3 = sigma_eqp == sqrt(sigma_1p**2 + sigma_3**2 - sigma_1p *
sigma_3);
assume(sigma_eqp > 0)
print eqn3.solve(sigma_1p, so
Hi
Has anyone tried to implement dsage on cluster ?
Where can I read about it ?
Serge A. Salamanka
calcp...@aol.com пишет:
> Hi Everyone!
>
> I've been playing with MATLAB and Octave for a while now to introduce
> my students (AP Computer Science and AP Calculus) to the world of
> Scientific
Hi Martin,
On 17 Apr., 12:14, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> > Unfortunately, SuperCommutative isn't available in libsingular (yet,
> > hint hint...).
>
> It seems the command is implemented as Singular script and not in C.
I know that the SuperCommutative *command* is a script, but I would be
very s
> Unfortunately, SuperCommutative isn't available in libsingular (yet,
> hint hint...).
It seems the command is implemented as Singular script and not in C. Thus
until we have an interface to call Singular library code, there isn't much we
can do. However, IIRC Burcin worked on exposing whatev
Hi Travis,
On 17 Apr., 10:32, Travis Willse wrote:
> Is there a reasonable way to implement the exterior (alternating)
> algebra of a finite-dimensional vector space? One could do this with
> FreeAlgebraQuotient, but I want to compute the exterior algebra over
> QQ^7, which is large enough (dim
Is there a reasonable way to implement the exterior (alternating)
algebra of a finite-dimensional vector space? One could do this with
FreeAlgebraQuotient, but I want to compute the exterior algebra over
QQ^7, which is large enough (dimension 128) that using that class
would be tedious.
Best,
Tr
27 matches
Mail list logo