On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:31 PM, wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> (1) I typed the following equations into sage
>
> eq1 = t1 == ( l / v0 )
> eq2 = v1 * ( t2 - t1 ) / 2 + v2 * ( t2 - t1 )/2
> eq3 = vav == ( ( 2 * l ) / t2 )
> solve( [eq1, eq2, eq3], t2, vav, l )
>
> I get the correct answer, but directly the an
Hi
(1) I typed the following equations into sage
eq1 = t1 == ( l / v0 )
eq2 = v1 * ( t2 - t1 ) / 2 + v2 * ( t2 - t1 )/2
eq3 = vav == ( ( 2 * l ) / t2 )
solve( [eq1, eq2, eq3], t2, vav, l )
I get the correct answer, but directly the answer.
Is there a way to output the intermedite results as w
On Jan 4, 2009, at 9:35 PM, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hi, I see that sage can call mathematica functions - I suppose that
> only works if I have mathematica installed.
>
> What I'm wondering is if I can import a mathmatica notebook into sage?
> We used to have mathematica at my school and I re
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, wrote:
>
> Hi, I see that sage can call mathematica functions - I suppose that
> only works if I have mathematica installed.
>
> What I'm wondering is if I can import a mathmatica notebook into sage?
> We used to have mathematica at my school and I remember using
Hi, I see that sage can call mathematica functions - I suppose that
only works if I have mathematica installed.
What I'm wondering is if I can import a mathmatica notebook into sage?
We used to have mathematica at my school and I remember using some very
nice mathematica notebooks by Jerry Uh
I tried this in 3.2.3.final and it works fine:
sage: a,b = matrix(QQ,[[0,1],[-4,0]]).eigenvalues(); a,b
(2*I, -2*I)
sage: a in RR
False
sage: b in RR
False
so perhaps you should upgrade?
John Cremona
2009/1/4 Shing Hing Man :
>
> Hi,
> I would like to test if an eigenvalue of a matrix over t
Hi,
I would like to test if an eigenvalue of a matrix over the
rationals is a real number.
(or The roots of the characteristic polynomial are all real.)
I am using
x in RR
Somehow, when x=2i, 'x in RR' produced the following error.
Thanks in advance for any assistance!
Shing
PS
Hi Robert,
thanks for your answer,
I not sure if I know the difference between coercion and conversion,
could you explain it to me?
thanks,
Georg
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this grou
Thanks. By problem went away with Sage 3.2.2.
Dave
On Dec 27 2008, 10:55 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Dec 27, 9:11 am,DavidPerkinson wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
> > Here is a typical error when I try to run a combinatorial function:
>
> > sage: combinations([1,2],3)
> > -
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:16 AM, gerhard wrote:
>
> Consistent with what I was guessing.
> Since I need have the notebook invoke my own executable,
> rather than python (just an init function will not do),
> I have to find where the process is spawned and insure I have
> an option that allows me t
2009/1/4 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 5:05 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:48 PM, mabshoff
>>
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Jan 3, 4:33 pm, calcp...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> > Hi AJG,
>>
>> >> Exactly, the function log base 2 of x is not defined at 0.
>> >> So, why won't sage ret
Consistent with what I was guessing.
Since I need have the notebook invoke my own executable,
rather than python (just an init function will not do),
I have to find where the process is spawned and insure I have
an option that allows me to do something different.
So where do I look?
The way I sta
I am using Sage 3.2,1 and it does not work with a complicated
filename.
I will try it in Sage 3.2.3.
Geogr: Thanks for the reply! I'll try latexmath2y after I find out how
to import a python class into Sage.
Thanks!
Shing
On Jan 3, 11:25 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:0
13 matches
Mail list logo