On Oct 3, 3:29 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ines Abdeljaoued-TEJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'll be to the office tomorrow; do you understand french ?
I suggested sending the install log *off list* since most people on
this list did not
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ines Abdeljaoued-TEJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be to the office tomorrow; do you understand french ?
You get an "internal compiler error" when installing the Cython
spkg. You're using "gcc version 4.1.0 (SUSE Linux)" and the
error is copied below and is, i
hi,
I use sage (in notebook mode) for basic calculations on a daily basis.
I also like to print out my calculations and hand it in with my
exercise.
Since the people who correct them here at the ETH university in Zürich
are not familiar with sage, I would like to print every result with
the varia
Hi, it would appear that #auto is incompatible with %html. Is this
working as intended, or is there another way? If I don't use %html,
anything I write doesn't word-wrap (word wrapping is what I want).
Elsewhere, William wrote that:
" If word wrapped, if you click to the left of the
output, it
>> I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so
>> "by extension SR" means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I.
>
> I just meant in the sense that fixing an embedding into CC fixes the
> embedding into SR, QQbar, ComplexField(1000), etc. The embedding will
> actually be
Samuel Gaehwiler wrote:
> hi,
>
> I use sage (in notebook mode) for basic calculations on a daily basis.
> I also like to print out my calculations and hand it in with my
> exercise.
> Since the people who correct them here at the ETH university in Zürich
> are not familiar with sage, I would lik
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so
"by extension SR" means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I.
>>>
>>> I just meant
On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>> I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so
>>> "by extension SR" means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I.
>>
>> I just meant in the sense that fixing an embedding into CC fixes the
>> embedding into SR, QQbar,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 11:40 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 200
Hi samuel,
may you write yourself a wrapper which similar to this:
>>> def ashow(**args):
... for key in args:
... print key,'=',args[key]
...
>>> c = 345.45
>>> ashow(c=c)
c = 345.45
instead of print key,'=',args[key]
one could write
return str(key) + '=' + str(args[key])
the f
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:31 AM, jdmuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Or, if you don't like constantly having to repeat the variable name,
something like:
sage: def vshow(_v):
: print '%s = %s\n' % (_v,latex(globals()[_v]))
:
sage: var('q')
q
sage: a = 3*q/2
sage: vshow('a')
a = \frac{{3 q}}{2}
This is far from an ideal solution, as if you call it
from
pong wrote:
>
> For a quick solution, you can try
>
> print('a2 ='),a2
>
> I hope someone who know SAGE much better can tell you how to print it
> in the LaTeX form.
print('a2='),latex(a2)
or
print('a2 = %s'%latex(a2))
-Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
For a quick solution, you can try
print('a2 ='),a2
I hope someone who know SAGE much better can tell you how to print it
in the LaTeX form.
On Oct 3, 7:07 am, Samuel Gaehwiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I use sage (in notebook mode) for basic calculations on a daily basis.
> I also l
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> I've actually been working on a patch for coercion that will allow
> number fields to come with specified embeddings, in which case we
> will let I be in QQ[sqrt(-1)] (or even perhaps ZZ[sqrt(-1)]), but
> with a specified embedding into CC (and by extension SR) so th
On Oct 3, 5:30 am, Ines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi !
> I tried to insatll a last version of sage : sage-3.1.2.tar with no
> sucess. How can I send you the insall.log file ?
>
> Ines.
Hi Ines,
please send it compressed to me off list per email.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~---
Hi !
I tried to insatll a last version of sage : sage-3.1.2.tar with no
sucess. How can I send you the insall.log file ?
Ines.
On 30 sep, 16:54, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> Ines Abdeljaoued-TEJ wrote:
> > Hi !
>
> Hi Ines,
>
> please don't take discussions off list.
>
>
>
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:43 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:31 AM, jdmuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am a total newcomer, and here is very simple high-school level
>>> questio
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:58 AM, jdmuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok thanks to you both. Your answers show both Sage's flexibility and
> its room for improvement. The QQ[sqrt(-1)] idea is especially
> baffling, and completely out of reach of the target audience (high
> school).
>
> As a newbie
19 matches
Mail list logo