On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:05 PM, William Stein wrote: > >>> I'm worried that won't work, since CC is 53-bit precision floats, so >>> "by extension SR" means you'll end up with 1.0*I rather than I. >> >> I just meant in the sense that fixing an embedding into CC fixes the >> embedding into SR, QQbar, ComplexField(1000), etc. The embedding will >> actually be into the "complex lazy field." > > Can you write a paragraph or two about these new lazy > fields you've been implementing?
Yes, see the docstrings at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/ 4226 . - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
