On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 at 05:12PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> > I think it would be very easy for us to add an
> > address='all'
> > option, which would allow access from anywhere.
> > Would you like that?
>
> I sure w
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 at 05:12PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> I think it would be very easy for us to add an
> address='all'
> option, which would allow access from anywhere.
> Would you like that?
I sure would. I think most people who want to access the server remotely
will want to access it f
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 at 09:07AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> > > I get the same behavior on my computer, with 2.11. I have to use my IP
> > > (143.248.25.196) and I can't use sansu5.kaist.ac.kr. AFAIK there's
> > > nothing we
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 at 09:07AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> > I get the same behavior on my computer, with 2.11. I have to use my IP
> > (143.248.25.196) and I can't use sansu5.kaist.ac.kr. AFAIK there's
> > nothing weird about the network; forward and reverse DNS works fine, so
> > it really should
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sage already has two decorators that provide this functionality.
>
> @func_persist will remember the computed values across Sage sessions
> since the results are written to a file
> @CachedFunction just stores the resul
Hi,
I ran across the following post and thought I would pass it along.
http://avinashv.net/2008/04/python-decorators-syntactic-sugar/
For those of us who were weened on Maple, the post describes a very
nice way to get the "options remember" functionality that is built
into Maple in python (and
Hello,
Sage already has two decorators that provide this functionality.
@func_persist will remember the computed values across Sage sessions
since the results are written to a file
@CachedFunction just stores the results in memory
Note that all of the arguments to the function whose results you
2008/4/21 Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I'm sorry to reply in so late on this, things have been busy and I've
> not been keeping up with the list lately.
>
> As for my slides: all included examples do work in Sage or "Sage++",
> where Sage++ denotes a future vers
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Aleksandr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In what version of Sage was n implemented for matrices? Right now,
> N(m) gives an error in my version 2.9.2
This is *only* in Sage-3.0, which hasn't been released yet. There you
will be able to do:
sage: m = matrix([[2
In what version of Sage was n implemented for matrices? Right now,
N(m) gives an error in my version 2.9.2
sage: N(m)
---
Traceback (most recent call
last)
/home/sasha/ in ()
/opt/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:33 AM, gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 10:15 pm, gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Here's something:
> > the Java console reports an error:
> >
> ---
On Apr 20, 10:15 pm, gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's something:
> the Java console reports an error:
> --
> Init Jmol
> language=en_US
> Jmol applet jmolApplet0[533848364848684]
> AppletR
Hello everyone.
I'm sorry to reply in so late on this, things have been busy and I've
not been keeping up with the list lately.
As for my slides: all included examples do work in Sage or "Sage++",
where Sage++ denotes a future version of Sage. The upshot is that
there is some code to add support
If you note carefully, the slides switch from being about "Let's use
Sage" to "Let's use Sage++" between Demos 5 and 6, which would
validate John's suspicion. In a slightly older version than Jason's I
have neither MacDonald nor Jack Polynomials, and of course not Poset,
and apparently not "@man
John Cremona wrote:
> PS Sorry that should have read "posted" and not "poseted" , ha ha.
> The talk is at
> http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~saliola/maths/talks/slides/SageTalk1.pdf
>
Interesting. I tried the example in 2.11 and ran into problems with the
very first line:
sage: P = Poset([[1,2],[
Dan Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 at 10:20AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Excellent! Gerhard, this now works for me with sage-3.0.alpha5:
>>>
>>> sage -c "notebook(address='137.146.194.57', open_viewer=False,
>>>
Simon King wrote:
>> ... and since you wanted a matrix of *numbers* out of m, you may do
>> sage: m(1.,2.)
>
> Oops, i just see that your original example was x=pi/2, y=pi. That is
> fine:
> sage: m(pi/2,pi)
> [0 0]
> [0 0]
>
> and is of course better than going via RR:
> sage: m(RR(pi/2),RR(pi)
> ... and since you wanted a matrix of *numbers* out of m, you may do
> sage: m(1.,2.)
Oops, i just see that your original example was x=pi/2, y=pi. That is
fine:
sage: m(pi/2,pi)
[0 0]
[0 0]
and is of course better than going via RR:
sage: m(RR(pi/2),RR(pi))
[ 6.12323399573676e-17
Hi Aleksandr,
On Apr 21, 4:25 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sage: m(1,2)
> [ cos(1) 0]
> [ 0 -sin(2)]
>
... and since you wanted a matrix of *numbers* out of m, you may do
sage: m(1.,2.)
[ 0.540302305868140 0]
[ 0 -0.909297426825682]
19 matches
Mail list logo
