Hello everyone. I'm sorry to reply in so late on this, things have been busy and I've not been keeping up with the list lately.
As for my slides: all included examples do work in Sage or "Sage++", where Sage++ denotes a future version of Sage. The upshot is that there is some code to add support for posets (written by Peter Jipsen and myself). It hasn't been released yet because I didn't like the way it was implemented, so I started again from stratch. I will make available what we have shortly, hopefully be the end of the day. It is already quite usable (at least for small posets) and supports everything Dan Drake requested in his earlier message. I think it is a good time for people to look at the code and offer suggestions on implementation before I continue adding features. Franco -- On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:45 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you note carefully, the slides switch from being about "Let's use > Sage" to "Let's use Sage++" between Demos 5 and 6, which would > validate John's suspicion. In a slightly older version than Jason's I > have neither MacDonald nor Jack Polynomials, and of course not Poset, > and apparently not "@manipulate" (as opposed to "@interact"). In Demo > 9 he returns to regular Sage. > > - kcrisman > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
