On Feb 9, 2008 2:56 PM, Peter Jockisch <> wrote:
> Peter Jockisch
>
> Germany
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Stein:
>
> 1. Sage-Tutorial, Release 2008.02.02
> -
> Obviously, one TeX-run was missing: The table of contents states that
> section "3.10 The Notebook Interface
On Feb 9, 2008 1:41 PM, Shunsuke Tsuchioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Linbox Support team,
>
> I am a graduate student in the math department of Kyoto university,
> and want to calculate a basis of the nullspace
>
> \{ x\in F^n \mid Ax=0 \}
>
> for a given m times n matrix A w
Dear Alfredo,
> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:51:30 -0500
> From: "Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I also ran into this problem compiling Sage 2.10.1
>
> Did you find any solution for it?
no. However with the help of Michael Abshoff I've found out what the problem
exact
On Feb 8, 2008 11:05 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm having some trouble doctesting non sage files. The only things I
> could find in the Programming Guide were:
>
> 4.3.1 Testing .py, .pyx and .sage Files
>
> Run sage -t to test that all code examples in
> filename.py. Si
On Feb 8, 2008 11:15 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The function
>
> random_prime(n)
>
> returns differing types of objects. When n is 2, it returns a Sage
> integer. When n is > 2, it returns a Python integer. A look at the
> source code gives the impression that it should return a Sag
carlos wrote:
> Is it posible to use php with sage ?
One way that I know of to allow an external language to access SAGE is to use
the following simple SAGE server program:
Server
#
# Alex Clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007
# Modified to use the SAGE preparser and to accept
# multiple
On Feb 9, 2008 1:14 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Bobby,
>
> On Feb 9, 12:26 pm, "Bobby Moretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We chose this since triple equals seemed ridiculous.
>
> Certainly i understand that you had to make a choice, and i agree that
> it is a reasonable
Dear Bobby,
On Feb 9, 12:26 pm, "Bobby Moretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We chose this since triple equals seemed ridiculous.
Certainly i understand that you had to make a choice, and i agree that
it is a reasonable choice.
Certainly i agree that a change would be destructive,
and certainly
> > If this is true (i never met maxima before, but i did met "=="
> > before...) then i really don't see why "==" in some context creates an
> > equation. Except that now it would likely be difficult to change,
> > since some code may depend on it.
>
> When you make two *purely* symbolic expressi
On Feb 9, 2008 3:07 AM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Feb 9, 8:44 am, "Jurgis Pralgauskis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > maybe "===" would be better for equations?
>
> At least according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equals_sign a
> triple equals sign usually denotes
Hi,
On Feb 9, 8:44 am, "Jurgis Pralgauskis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> maybe "===" would be better for equations?
At least according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equals_sign a
triple equals sign usually denotes identity, whereas the meaning of a
single or a double equals sign is ambiguous.
Is it posible to use php with sage ?
thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/gr
12 matches
Mail list logo
