Thanks again! I got the idea now. However, there is a problem which
sticks me in the first stage and if I can solve it so your code work
as prefect for me. The problem is that the instruction
v(z)
is not strong enough for my popuse. It works prefect when z is in k =
GF(2^5) but it is not working
Hi,
I've released sage-2.8.3.5 which fixes a couple of bugs and minor issues
that came up earlier today.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://www.williamstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 20:54, William Stein wrote:
> > sage: M. = FreeMonoid(2)
> > sage: (x*y).substitute(x=1)
> > x*y # I would think that this is 1*y
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I find that result unsatisfactory as well, but I sure don't have a good
> > idea about what ring (?) the result '1*y
On 9/5/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
\> Yes, so I found FreeMonoid after sending my first e-mail and was testing it
> out. I think I may have found something that is not implemented:
>
> sage: a=FreeMonoid(1,'a').0
> sage: a*a
> a^2
> sage: a.substitute(5)
> a # should be 5?
> sa
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 18:47, William Stein wrote:
> Or maybe you really want a free monoid?
>
> sage: M. = FreeMonoid(2)
> sage: x*y*x*x*y
> x*y*x^2*y
> sage: (x*y*x*x*y)^3
> x*y*x^2*y*x*y*x^2*y*x*y*x^2*y
Yes, so I found FreeMonoid after sending my first e-mail and was testing it
out.
On 9/5/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wishing for a ZZ[x,y] where xy!=yx, but I can't seem to find the way to
> construct such a creature. Is it not yet implemented?
>
> In reality, I really only want a monomial so it pretty much boils down to a
> free group on x and y, but t
Hi,
I'm wishing for a ZZ[x,y] where xy!=yx, but I can't seem to find the way to
construct such a creature. Is it not yet implemented?
In reality, I really only want a monomial so it pretty much boils down to a
free group on x and y, but the polynomial ring would make for some pretty
syntax e
Thanks for reporting this.
This is
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/596
Can you try Ctl-C, Ctl-C (twice in rapid succession)
and see if that works?
++
On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm experimenting with the wiki. When
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 11:21, mabshoff wrote:
> On Sep 5, 5:08 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > When building any of the 2.8.3.x releases on my 64-bit Opteron 246
> > > running RHEL5, I encounter the following
On 9/5/07, Kate Minola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William,
>
> I attempted to build sage-2.8.3.4 from source
> using the gcc-4.2.1 compiler suite.
>
> On both my x86-Linux and x86_64-Linux machines
> the build succeeded, but 'make test'
> hung at
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/
On Sep 5, 9:40 pm, "Kate Minola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William,
>
> I attempted to build sage-2.8.3.4 from source
> using the gcc-4.2.1 compiler suite.
>
> On both my x86-Linux and x86_64-Linux machines
> the build succeeded, but 'make test'
> hung at
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage
William,
I attempted to build sage-2.8.3.4 from source
using the gcc-4.2.1 compiler suite.
On both my x86-Linux and x86_64-Linux machines
the build succeeded, but 'make test'
hung at
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py
Also may I make a small plea that
'make check' be put ba
On Sep 5, 7:59 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, David DeGeorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dear Developers
> > I am running Suse 10.1 and
> > sage-2.8.3-32bit-linux-suse10-i686-Linux
> > I can't get lie to build. It complains about not finding -lcurses.
> > l
On 9/5/07, David DeGeorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Developers
> I am running Suse 10.1 and
> sage-2.8.3-32bit-linux-suse10-i686-Linux
> I can't get lie to build. It complains about not finding -lcurses.
> libcurses.a is
> not in a standard place (it is in /usr/lib/curses), I tried addi
On Sep 5, 5:08 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > When building any of the 2.8.3.x releases on my 64-bit Opteron 246
> > running RHEL5, I encounter the following error during the compile of
> > the
> > sage-2.8.3.x m
On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When building any of the 2.8.3.x releases on my 64-bit Opteron 246
> running RHEL5, I encounter the following error during the compile of
> the
> sage-2.8.3.x module.
...
> In file included from
> /scratch/sage-2.8.3/local/include/python2.5
On 9/5/07, Markus Fraczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it's me again, sorry for reporting another (possible) bug within 24 hours...
>
> sage: CC = ComplexField(332)
> sage:
> X=CC(1.357903630374279963068269401271673391959119893809138669904789002836753985101796915789954726170961844+0.0865687792796
On 9/5/07, JMD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the compilation of sage-2.8.3.3, but "sage -testall" seems to do
> nothing.
> I have just a lot of messages like this :
>
>
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/mpl3d/surface.py (skipping) --
> nodoctest.py file in directory
There was a merge error in
When building any of the 2.8.3.x releases on my 64-bit Opteron 246
running RHEL5, I encounter the following error during the compile of
the
sage-2.8.3.x module.
--
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
scons: done reading SConscript files.
scons: Building targets ...
Install file: "ZZ_pylong.h"
On 9/5/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/4/07, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My memory could be wrong, but I feel that this exact problem has
> > occurred before. (The problem of running scripts on the command line not
> > working -- not necessarily the exact same
Dear Developers
I am running Suse 10.1 and
sage-2.8.3-32bit-linux-suse10-i686-Linux
I can't get lie to build. It complains about not finding -lcurses.
libcurses.a is
not in a standard place (it is in /usr/lib/curses), I tried adding a
symbolic link to
/usr/lib but then the build failed in readlin
Hi,
it's me again, sorry for reporting another (possible) bug within 24 hours...
sage: CC = ComplexField(332)
sage:
X=CC(1.357903630374279963068269401271673391959119893809138669904789002836753985101796915789954726170961844+0.086568779279628759168431334063394122254709731239706238026787660388961
Hello,
I posted patches to fix this on http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/587
. They should be in sage-2.8.3.3 which was released today. sage -
upgrade should do the trick.
--Mike
On Sep 4, 12:17 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Sep 4, 5:10 pm, Markus Fraczek <[EMAIL
the compilation of sage-2.8.3.3, but "sage -testall" seems to do
nothing.
I have just a lot of messages like this :
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/mpl3d/surface.py (skipping) --
nodoctest.py file in directory
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send
On 9/4/07, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My memory could be wrong, but I feel that this exact problem has
> occurred before. (The problem of running scripts on the command line not
> working -- not necessarily the exact same underlying cause for the
> problem.)
>
> This kind of basic
25 matches
Mail list logo
