[sage-gsoc] Re: Regarding Contribution in GSoC 2021

Dear Aryan, Thank you for your interest. I would suggest getting familiar with the developer guide http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html (what’s the coding standard, how to use git and trac, etc.). Furthermore, I think it would be good to make a small contribution to SageMath i

[sage-gsoc] Re: [GSoc 2022] Looking for resources for project related to Schubert and Grothendieck Polynomials.

Dear Archit, Thank you for your interest. There are many resources that are available online that can be found. One good place to start is on symmetricfunctions.com . To be successful at this project, you will need to be able to understand the

[sage-gsoc] Re: To get some doubts answered

Dear Priyal, I would recommend doing some Google searching for the definition of a free module as this information is readily available with lots of examples (and non-examples). You can find the files related to the tensor operations in the src/sage

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2022 Introduction

Hi Pedro, The exterior algebra is a subclass of the Clifford algebra (as it is a special case), and the problem is the basis is indexed by subsets of {1, ..., n}, which is a bit wasteful in terms of memory and manipulations. These are much more compactly written as integers with n bits. So th

[sage-gsoc] Re: Need Guidance in Contributing to SageMath for GSoC 2023

Dear Shubham, You should get acquainted with our development model, which you can find out about on our github page: https://github.com/Sage. Additional information regarding the application process can be found on the ideas page. For the free modules implementations, you should look at the

[sage-gsoc] Re: Regarding contribution in 2023 GSOC

Dear Soumya, You should get acquainted with our development model, which you can find out about on our github page: https://github.com/Sage. Additional information regarding the application process can be found on the ideas page. For this project, you will need to expand the matrix implement

[sage-gsoc] Re: Gsoc 2023

Dear Sneha, You should get acquainted with our development model, which you can find out about on our github page: https://github.com/Sage. Additional information regarding the application process can be found on the ideas page: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2023 Best, Travis On Sunday, Ma

[sage-gsoc] Re: Regarding the GSOC 23

Dear Christos, You should get acquainted with our development model, which you can find out about on our github page: https://github.com/Sage. Additional information regarding the application process can be found on the ideas page For that project in particular, you should spend some time und

[sage-gsoc] Re: Gsoc 2023

The wrong link got in there for the SageMath github page: https://github.com/sagemath/sage On Thursday, March 9, 2023 at 11:39:06 AM UTC+9 tcscrims wrote: > Dear Sneha, >You should get acquainted with our development model, which you can > find out about on our github pa

[sage-gsoc] Re: Regarding contribution in 2023 GSOC

The wrong link got in there for the SageMath github page: https://github.com/sagemath/sage On Thursday, March 9, 2023 at 11:38:28 AM UTC+9 tcscrims wrote: > Dear Soumya, >You should get acquainted with our development model, which you can > find out about on our github pa

[sage-gsoc] Re: Need Guidance in Contributing to SageMath for GSoC 2023

The wrong link got in there for the SageMath github page: https://github.com/sagemath/sage On Thursday, March 9, 2023 at 11:35:18 AM UTC+9 tcscrims wrote: > Dear Shubham, >You should get acquainted with our development model, which you can > find out about on our github pa

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2023: algebras & Gröbner bases - project scope and references?

Dear Jamie, Thank you for your interest. There are no specific suggested references, but it is very easy to find the necessary background information on Groebner bases for polynomial rings through a Google search. It is also easy to find information regarding those for the exterior algebra (a

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2023 !

Dear Atharva, Thank you for your interest. One starting point would be looking at the definition of a commutative semiring. A sort-of canonical example is the tropical semiring. You can look at SageMath's implementation of this. You can search through all of the issues on our github page, inc

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 23

Dear Ke, There are a number of very standard references that you can find with a quick Google search. For example, just plugging in the title gives me https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12448 as the first hit. Another starting point would be Stanley's Enumerative Combinatorics. Best, Travis On Satu

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoc 23

Hi Mark, My advice would be that you should apply for the projects that interest you and that you think you have the capacity to undertake. Best, Travis On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 5:30:54 AM UTC+9 mark...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello Mentors, > My name is Mark Paquette, and I am a sophomore Co

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSOC 2023: Improve (free) module implementations

Dear Sakshi, Thank you for your interest. All of the relevant information is located on our ideas page with regards to the project. Best, Travis On Friday, March 24, 2023 at 10:02:26 PM UTC+9 soni...@rknec.edu wrote: > Hello Sage Math Team, > > My name is Sakshi Soni, and I am a 2nd-year Co

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC' 23

Dear Atharva, This forum is one of the best places to discuss aspects of the projects as it can be seen by all of the SageMath mentors (who will view the proposal as part of the review process). Currently for that idea, there is no specific mentor who has said they will only mentor that (over

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2023

Dear Nakagawa-san, Thank you for your interest. You can find the information regarding the format of a proposal through SageMath's ideas page: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2023 It would be good to get yourself familiarized with how to use Sage and our development process through github thr

Re: [sage-gsoc] GCD algorithms

You can see the path in the output of `??`. Best, Travis On Sunday, March 26, 2023 at 4:30:11 PM UTC+9 jaysha...@gmail.com wrote: > Yeah, I create the ring and use > Can you give the path, where can I get the source code? > > On Sun, 26 Mar, 2023, 03:07 David Roe, wrote: > >> If you create a s

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSOC 2023- tensor backend

Dear Akanksha, Thank you for your interest. You can find all of the relevant information for the proposals on our ideas wiki: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2023 Please let us know if you have any questions. Best, Travis On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 9:52:11 AM UTC+9 itsaka...@gmail.com w

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2023 Tensor Operations

Dear Wade, Thank you for your interest. As you are likely aware, our ideas page (https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2023) has the relevant information on drafting a proposal. Perhaps Matthias can say something more, but I think you should also get acquainted with some basics of manifolds and/or

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSOC 2023 : Adding PDF documentation compiled in XeTeX

Dear Priyanshu, Thank you for your interest. You can upload the draft through the Google submission page, where all of the mentors can view it. One of the mentors will try to do a review of it soon once it is uploaded. Best, Travis On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 6:21:24 AM UTC+9 idealpr...@gmai

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 23

Dear Ke, Your proposal should have a lot more details about the project, not just to demonstrate your command of the subject area, but also including some sketches of how the implementation will go (not necessarily limited to these two things). Best, Travis On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:19

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSOC proposal for review

Dear Aman, We can provide feedback, but given the very short time before the deadline, it is unlikely someone will be able to review it in time. We can try, but we cannot promise anything. Best, Travis On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:19:20 AM UTC+9 ak064...@gmail.com wrote: > Hy, I am Aman

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSOC 2023 : Adding PDF documentation compiled in XeTeX

d I put in the field 'Project Size'? Should it be medium or >> large? >> >> Thanks >> Priyanshu >> On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 5:57:43 PM UTC+5:30 tcscrims wrote: >> >>> Dear Priyanshu, >>>Thank you for your interest. You can upl

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2023: algebras & Gröbner bases - project scope and references?

rithms for now. >> >> I'm currently setting this up on my machine and exploring the code >> mentioned in the issues. Hoping to have a project idea soon. >> >> Best, >> Jamie >> >> On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 4:26:59 PM UTC-7 tcscrims wrote: >

[sage-gsoc] Re: Regarding GSOC-24

Dear Paras, At this point, we have not yet even applied for GSoC 2024, much less be accepted by Google as a mentor organization. Please check back after Google has decided the mentor organizations for GSoC 2024 (which as I recall is in April). Best, Travis On Thursday, December 7, 2023 at

[sage-gsoc] Re: Reg: Getting Started

Dear Seturaj, Thank you for your interest. At this point, we have not yet even applied for GSoC 2024, much less be accepted by Google as a mentor organization. Please check back after Google has decided the mentor organizations for GSoC 2024 (which as I recall is in April). If you are still

[sage-gsoc] Re: Regarding GSOC 2024

Dear Ruchit, Google has not yet decided what mentor organizations will be supported under GSoC. Please check back once that information has been given. I don't know the answer to 1 offhand, but that information should be available on the GSoC information page. For 2, we are building our list

[sage-gsoc] Re: Gsoc 2024

Dear Shehab, Google has not yet decided what mentor organizations will be supported under GSoC. Please check back about GSoC with SageMath once that information has been released. If you want to contribute to SageMath in the meantime, please see our developer's guide: https://doc.sagemath.or

[sage-gsoc] Re: Google Summer of Code

Dear Veeransh, Thank you for your interest in contributing to SageMath. For questions regarding general Sage issues/PRs, you can ask either directly on the issue/PR, and if nobody responds after a few days, you can try asking on our sage-devel mailing list. Best, Travis On Friday, February

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC vs Summer Research

Hi Tilo, At this point, I can't give much specific advice because I don't know enough about what you want. From your message, it seems like you are thinking of pursuing a career as a research mathematician by attending a grad school in math. Even within that, it depends on what area of math y

[sage-gsoc] Re: Excited to start my contribution journey with sage

Dear Rasesh, A project proposal for GSoC related to code on the Collatz conjecture would certainly be considered. Best, Travis On Thursday, February 22, 2024 at 11:11:03 PM UTC+9 rases...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > I am a 3rd year undergraduate pursuing Computer Science with Business > S

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interested in contributing to SageMath and participating in GSoC 2024

Dear Dhrumil, Thank you for your interest. You can find all of the information related to developing for Sage in our developer's guide: https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/ For a list of project ideas and the application template, you can find the information on the following wiki pag

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSOC 2024

Dear Carlos, Thank you for your interest. The information regarding proposals for GSoC is available at the bottom of the wiki page: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/Contributors If you have any specific questions, feel free to send a message to this forum. Best, Travis On Monday, February 2

[sage-gsoc] Re: Introductions! (GSoC 2024)

Dear Vivek, Thank you for your interest. You can find the relevant information within our developer's guide: https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/ Best, Travis On Sunday, February 25, 2024 at 9:26:16 PM UTC+9 21cs...@rgipt.ac.in wrote: > Hey! > > I'm *Vivek*, a junior-year undergradu

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC - Further Contributions to SageMath

Hi Shriya, Thank you for your message. 1. Have a GB (Gröbner basis) means we can write any element in the quotient to a unique standard form. In particular, we can tell if two elements are equal in the quotient ring if and only if they reduce to the same element. For the generic implementati

[sage-gsoc] Re: Associative-Magmatic-Algebras

Mathematically speaking, you can always weaken axioms. However, there are some extra advantages that additive groups have that commutative semirings don't have (mainly 0, the additive identity). That being said, there isn't anything prevent you from constructing the appropriate categories. It w

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interested in contributing to SageMath and participating in GSoC 2024

ner bases" > *project. I do not entirely understand this project at the moment and > currently, I am exploring Grobner basis. > Please can you also provide me some resource in order to understand > *Singular's > plural library implementation* as well as *SageMath&

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC Practical scope of chow ring of matroid in sagemath

Dear Avinash, Thank you for your interest. I don’t understand your question about practical aspects. The application to doing computations in an active (and important) area of mathematics research is an important “practical” use of this class. Best, Travis On Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 4:44

[sage-gsoc] Re: Clarification in the project idea "Coordinate the GCA and exterior algebra implementations"

Dear Pranav, In part, but not entirely. The exterior algebra is a specific case of a GCA where all generators are odd. The exterior algebra code currently assumes all of those generators are degree 1, but it could be extended. The other part would be to mix the (commutative) polynomial rings

[sage-gsoc] Re: Associative-Magmatic-Algebras

*add(b,c) >> )? >> >> In fact we connot even do matrix subtraction directly. >> What can be done in these cases?? >> On Thursday, March 21, 2024 at 8:48:26 PM UTC+5:30 Animesh Shree wrote: >> >>> Hello Sir, >>> >>> I have submitted my prop

[sage-gsoc] Re: Associative-Magmatic-Algebras

mbolic Ring' and 'Tropical semiring over Rational Field' > 'Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Tropical semiring over Rational > Field' and 'Tropical semiring over Rational Field' > 'Tropical semiring over Rational Field' and 'Integer

[sage-gsoc] Re: Introduction and Interest in Contributing to SageMath

Dear Palak, Thank you for your interest in contributing to SageMath. Please see our developer’s guide for more information on how to contribute: https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html Be aware, this group is for questions related to SageMath’s participation in GSoC, which it h

[sage-gsoc] Re: Excited to Start Contributing to SageMath

Dear Nidha, Thank you for your interest in contributing to SageMath. Please see our developer’s guide for more information on how to contribute: https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html Be aware, this group is for questions related to SageMath’s participation in GSoC, which it h

[sage-gsoc] Re: Introduction and Interest in Contributing to SageMath

Dear Palak, Thank you for your interest. We have not yet even applied for GSoC, much less be accepted as a mentor organization by Google this upcoming year. Please wait until there is an announcement about this, which is usually made in February. Best, Travis On Friday, December 20, 2024 a

[sage-gsoc] Re: Excited to Start Contributing to SageMath

Dear Nidha, Thank you for your interest. We have not yet even applied for GSoC, much less be accepted as a mentor organization by Google this upcoming year. Please wait until there is an announcement about this, which is usually made in February. Best, Travis On Friday, December 20, 2024 a

[sage-gsoc] Re: Query about the available projects

Dear Aditya, Thank you for your interest. As we have not yet applied for GSoC for 2025, much less been accepted as a mentor organization, we do not currently have a project list for 2025. If you wish to contribute at this time, you can see our list of issues on our github repository https://

[sage-gsoc] Re: Inquiry About SageMath GSOC 2025 Free Modules Refactoring Project

Dear Prakhar, 1. That they are completely separate. So doing something for one does not benefit the other. Nor do they communicate with each other. However, they contain overlap in functionality. 2. I would expect such a project to have a complete restructuring of the classes involved. However,

[sage-gsoc] Re: Sage Math GSoC wiki not working for me.

Thank you for notifying us. We are working to try and get it back up ASAP. Best, Travis On Sunday, March 16, 2025 at 10:22:26 PM UTC+9 mahraib...@gmail.com wrote: > is just me or anyone else here facing the same issue. > SageMath 2025 wiki is down for some reasons. couple of weeks ago, I > chec

[sage-gsoc] Re: More info on the project : Add additional combinatorial (Hopf) algebras and additional bases

vis, > > I've setup sage locally, I was wondering if you could help me out in > trying some relevant documentation to my project interests. Also what could > be a useful first issue for me to solve or raise it myself. > > On Sunday, 9 March 2025 at 15:06:56 UTC+5:30

[sage-gsoc] Re: Sage Math GSoC wiki not working for me.

It is now working again. Sorry for the downtime. Best, Travis On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 10:40:32 AM UTC+9 tcscrims wrote: > Thank you for notifying us. We are working to try and get it back up ASAP. > > Best, > Travis > > On Sunday, March 16, 2025 at 10:22:26 PM UTC+9 ma

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interests in implementation of matrix spaces over commutative semirings

s/timeline for my project. Please > let me know if I'm on the right track here or I'm missing significant > information on some aspects. > Also, if I'm to discuss other details in my proposal, do I keep posting > here on the public channel, or do I message you private

[sage-gsoc] Re: More info on the project : Add additional combinatorial (Hopf) algebras and additional bases

rt. > > Regards, > Yashashwi > > On Monday, 17 March 2025 at 07:18:25 UTC+5:30 tcscrims wrote: > >> Dear Yashashwi, >> >> You can find a list of issues on our issue tracker, many of which can be >> good for a first PR. One recent one that I found was >>

Re: [sage-gsoc] Re: Subject: GSoC Proposal: Implement Representations of Lie Algebras in SageMath

e a good direction for SageMath? I’d love to hear your > feedback before submitting the full proposal. > > Best regards, > *Kshipra Wadikar* > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 6:27 PM tcscrims wrote: > >> Dear Kshipra, >>Thank you for your interest in doing GSoC with Sa

[sage-gsoc] Re: Query about the q- and qt-Characters Implementation Project

Dear potential applicant, I would strongly recommend that if you want to submit a proposal, you select a different idea to build your proposal around. In particular, your class design and implementation strategy is not related with how q/qt-characters are computed. Best, Travis On Monday,

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC Application Proposal: Improve (free) module implementations

Hi Noel, Thank you for all the contributions you have done so far. We are looking forward to your continued contributions. First, let me say that the general idea I posted about the project is probably beneath your skill level since it largely revolves around refactoring classes. It's a some

[sage-gsoc] SageMath Is a GSoC 2025 Mentor Organization

As the subject indicates. Please see our ideas page for this year's project ideas. Below are some useful links: - Ideas page: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2025 - Application guide: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/Contributors If you have any questions, please post to this mailing list. We are l

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interest in Enhanced support and interfaces for solutions of recurrences and differential equations project.

Dear Devansh, Thank you for your interest in GSoC. As you can see, there are a number of details about the implementation and problem available on the GSoC ideas page. As a first step, you should familiarize yourself with out developer's guide: https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/ Pl

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interest in Adding additional combinatorial algebras

Dear Shri, Thank you for your interest in SageMath and GSoC. You can find a number of the combinatorial Hopf algebras in Sage through our documentation: https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/chas/all.html This then will point towards the relevant files. For this pr

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interests in implementation of matrix spaces over commutative semirings

Hi Henry, Thank you for your interest. The short version is the matrix code is really complex and spread across multiple files, but there are many features of it that does not require all the commutative ring axioms. So the goal would be to figure out a way to refine things such that you can

[sage-gsoc] Re: GSoC 2025 - Interest in "Implement a Solver for the Killing Equations" Project with SageMath

Dear Ahmad, Thank you for your interest and sending your draft proposal. It is okay for an initial draft, but you should include significantly more details about how you expect to do your implementation and the associated mathematics. This will involve some fairly intricate mathematics, where

Re: [sage-gsoc] Interest in Adding additional combinatorial algebras

s, > Shri > > On 7 Mar 2025, at 11:46 AM, tcscrims wrote: > > Dear Shri, >Thank you for your interest in SageMath and GSoC. You can find a number > of the combinatorial Hopf algebras in Sage through our documentation: > > > https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/ref

[sage-gsoc] Re: More info on the project : Add additional combinatorial (Hopf) algebras and additional bases

Dear Yashashwi, Thank you for your interest. Please be aware that these are ideas for projects and you, the potential contributor, are expected to turn the idea into a full proposal. That being said, here are some additional ideas for you to consider from your questions. 1. As said, you need

Re: [sage-gsoc] Re: SageMath Is a GSoC 2025 Mentor Organization

2025, 11:25 tcscrims, wrote: > >> Hello, >>Thank you for your interest. As indicated, there is no specific mentor >> listed at this time, and so it will be decided if your proposal is selected. >> >> Please let us know if you have any additional questions by po

[sage-gsoc] Re: Regarding GSOC' 2025

Dear Krishna, Thank you for your interest. You can find all of the information on how to contribute in our developer's guide and how to write a proposal on our GSoC Contributors wiki page: - https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/ - https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/Contributors Please let

[sage-gsoc] Re: Interests in implementation of matrix spaces over commutative semirings

; contributing PR? > Regards > Henry > On Friday, March 7, 2025 at 1:23:46 AM UTC-5 tcscrims wrote: > >> Hi Henry, >>Thank you for your interest. >> >> The short version is the matrix code is really complex and spread across >> multiple files, but ther

[sage-gsoc] Re: SageMath Is a GSoC 2025 Mentor Organization

resources regarding the project. > Thanks > > > > On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 6:50:05 AM UTC+5:30 tcscrims wrote: > >> As the subject indicates. Please see our ideas page for this year's >> project ideas. Below are some useful links: >> >> - Ideas pa

[sage-gsoc] Re: Introduction and Interest in Gsoc 2025

Dear Aditya, Thank you for your interest in contributing to SageMath with GSoC. For how to prepare your GSoC application, please see the corresponding application guide: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/Contributors A part of your proposal will be submitting a PR and getting your environment r

[sage-gsoc] Re: Subject: GSoC Proposal: Implement Representations of Lie Algebras in SageMath

Dear Kshipra, Thank you for your interest in doing GSoC with SageMath. Please be aware that Verma modules and simple modules (in BBG category O) for simple Lie algebras have already been implemented in SageMath. In principle, that implementation also works for affine Lie algebras (I think it

[sage-gsoc] Re: Request for reference material and help in setting up sage development

Dear Shaurya, No, there are no video tutorials that I am aware of. You can post specific questions here and we can try to answer them. As for project #3, it is not so much about a mathematical concept but a refactoring of already existing structures (which have explanations and references in

[sage-gsoc] Re: Paths and Cycles Enumeration Methods in Graphs – GSoC 2025

Hey David, I am interested in contributing too. But my message got deleted when I posted it. Did I break any rule of the group? Sorry for saying this in this thread. No. It might have been accidentally flagged as a double post. Best, Travis On Sunday, March 23, 2025 at 4:14:10 PM UTC+5:30

[sage-gsoc] Re: Refactor the diagram algebras/monoids and add new ones

Dear Rishav, Apologies for the delayed response. You can email it directly to me, and I will do what I can to provide feedback. Best, Travis On Monday, March 24, 2025 at 6:19:39 AM UTC+9 rrc...@gmail.com wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I am a third year Electrical Engineering undergraduate. I am

[sage-gsoc] Re: Seeking feedback for GSoC Proposal

Dear Ashutosh, Thank you for submitting your proposal to GSoC this year. We have many excellent proposals submitted this year, but we were only given very limited slots by Google. While we cannot provide specific feedback regarding our selection process, I will say that in general people sub