Thanks, Bill. It continues to be fun and there's lots more to do. But I am
also looking forward to writing more content myself. ;-)
Rob
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:54:37 AM UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Rob, this is truly fantastic work. I want to congratulate you on getting
> this up and r
Dear Bernard,
I was thinking more of the "static" HTML pages you sent that had been
generated from TeX/LaTeX with your GIAC extensions (giac.tex). The
mathematics on those pages might look better with MathJax and that would be
an easier scenario to configure.
For the calculator page you just
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 3:12:38 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> IMHO we should think about moving non-technical Sage docs to mathbook.
>>
> write an automatic converted, why not...
>
>
Sage-flavored ReST/Sphinx might be structured/predictable enough to be very
amenable to this.
--
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:05:07 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Perhaps they should rather generate your XML? (beezertex filename ;-))
> No, seriously...
>
Yes, seriously. ;-) I hope that something like this will be in place
eventually.
> Please note that I actually rather like t
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:45:16 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
> It would be nice if Sage cells would know about which cells they depend
> on; Right now evaluating a cell in the middle is very likely to cough up an
> error message about something not being defined.
>
Yes, Sage Cells are
On 8/1/15 05:45, Volker Braun wrote:
It would be nice if Sage cells would know about which cells they depend
on; Right now evaluating a cell in the middle is very likely to cough up
an error message about something not being defined.
Interesting idea. Complicating factors include:
1. Executin
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 10:45:16 UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 4:14:33 AM UTC+2, Rob Beezer wrote:
>>
>> Seems only tex can understand TeX. ;-)
>>
>
> Tex it a Turing-complete language, XML is not. Hence only TeX can
> understand TeX,
>
Rather, "Wahr sind
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 4:14:33 AM UTC+2, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> Seems only tex can understand TeX. ;-)
>
Tex it a Turing-complete language, XML is not. Hence only TeX can
understand TeX, but for XML there are various 100% compliant parsers and
converters. IMHO your decision to use XML i
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 03:14:33 UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> On 07/31/2015 05:25 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > And if it is so easy to convert LaTeX into HTML, why hasn't anybody
> done it
> > successfully? tex4ht is the only one I know that comes close, and
> only
> > beca
