On Saturday, 1 August 2015 03:14:33 UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote: > > On 07/31/2015 05:25 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > And if it is so easy to convert LaTeX into HTML, why hasn't anybody > done it > > successfully? tex4ht is the only one I know that comes close, and > only > > because it is the only one that uses the tex executable. > > > > sure, why is this bad to use the tex executable? Because it has to be > done on > > the fly in your browser? Well, I cannot care less -- perhaps someone > should > > develop a NaCL implementation of (La)TeX to be runnable in the browser? > > Not bad to use the tex executable. That is the key design decision in > tex4ht > that makes it as good as it is. Seems only tex can understand TeX. ;-) >
Perhaps they should rather generate your XML? (beezertex filename ;-)) No, seriously... Please note that I actually rather like the way the e-book in question looks like, it's great in this way. And, by the way, looks good on an Android tablet too... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-edu+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-edu@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
